Hidden hysteresis – population dynamics can obscure gene network dynamics
© Poisson and Bhalerao; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 20 August 2012
Accepted: 11 June 2013
Published: 24 June 2013
Positive feedback is a common motif in gene regulatory networks. It can be used in synthetic networks as an amplifier to increase the level of gene expression, as well as a nonlinear module to create bistable gene networks that display hysteresis in response to a given stimulus. Using a synthetic positive feedback-based tetracycline sensor in E. coli, we show that the population dynamics of a cell culture has a profound effect on the observed hysteretic response of a population of cells with this synthetic gene circuit.
The amount of observable hysteresis in a cell culture harboring the gene circuit depended on the initial concentration of cells within the culture. The magnitude of the hysteresis observed was inversely related to the dilution procedure used to inoculate the subcultures; the higher the dilution of the cell culture, lower was the observed hysteresis of that culture at steady state. Although the behavior of the gene circuit in individual cells did not change significantly in the different subcultures, the proportion of cells exhibiting high levels of steady-state gene expression did change.
Although the interrelated kinetics of gene expression and cell growth are unpredictable at first sight, we were able to resolve the surprising dilution-dependent hysteresis as a result of two interrelated phenomena - the stochastic switching between the ON and OFF phenotypes that led to the cumulative failure of the gene circuit over time, and the nonlinear, logistic growth of the cell in the batch culture.
These findings reinforce the fact that population dynamics cannot be ignored in analyzing the dynamics of gene networks. Indeed population dynamics may play a significant role in the manifestation of bistability and hysteresis, and is an important consideration when designing synthetic gene circuits intended for long-term application.
Positive feedback is frequently seen as a regulatory mechanism in natural and synthetic gene networks [1–6]. Bistability and hysteresis are two salient functional features of positive feedback frequently exploited in synthetic gene networks [1, 7–11]. A bistable response constrains gene expression to one of two discrete, steady-state levels, conventionally named high / low or on / off states. The choice of the expression state is generally governed by the initial conditions of the system, which includes any prior gene expression history. Consequently, bistable systems exhibit some degree of hysteresis, i.e. memory of prior induction levels. A number of groups have studied natural and synthetic positive feedback gene networks in bacterial and mammalian hosts and have produced experimentally validated mathematical models to predict hysteretic behavior in transcriptional gene regulation [1, 8, 12, 13]. From the models, it becomes clear that although positive feedback can produce a bistable response in principle, bistability is not a guaranteed outcome of positive feedback. The appearance of hysteresis depends strongly on the relative production and degradation rates of the biomolecules responsible for expression regulation. A purely bistable response generally requires positively cooperative feedback, and an optimal balance of gene product synthesis and degradation [9, 10, 14, 15].
Under exceptional circumstances bistability can also appear without the presence of a positively cooperative positive feedback within the gene circuit, as long as there is another mechanism that can introduce the requisite non-linearity. For instance, a non-cooperative positive feedback can introduce the appearance of bistability when gene expression dynamics are coupled with a non-linear modulation of growth rate , or in the presence of significant noise . Unsurprisingly, mechanisms that induce hitherto unforeseen nonlinear or stochastic behaviors erode the predictability of artificial gene networks outside well-controlled experiments. This unpredictability is frequently referred to as context-dependent behavior in synthetic gene networks [18, 19], and remains one of the foremost challenges in realizing the grand vision of synthetic biology, namely the construction of arbitrary genetic and biochemical networks from standardized component parts [20, 21].
In addition to the two scenarios described above, (namely seeing hysteresis seen where we expect it, and seeing hysteresis where we do not expect it) we report a third, and (to the best of our knowledge) previously unreported scenario where we do not see hysteresis even though a biochemical model of gene expression predicts its presence. This work posits the influence of population dynamics in obscuring the appearance of hysteresis in gene networks. In this study we revisited the previously developed positive feedback based genetic signal amplifier  and examined it for hysteresis when the cell culture is propagated through batch cultures. We note that there exist bacterial growth theories which elucidate changes in gene expression as a function of growth rate in continuous, steady state, nutrient limited “balanced exponential” cultures [22, 23], which control the culture in a state of constant exponential growth. Significantly, these theories describe protein synthesis rates solely as a function of cell growth rate, which in turn is dependent upon the nutrient state of the cell. In batch cultures, neither cell growth rates nor gene expression profiles remain constant. Thus balanced exponential models of growth are not directly applicable to changes in transcription patterns that occur as a result of achieving stationary state through nutrient depletion in batch cultures.
A closer analysis of the gene network shown in Figure 1 suggests that this circuit satisfies the requirements for bistability, i.e. cooperative positive feedback and high gene expression rates. It is qualitatively similar to networks that display hysteresis [9, 13], and an analysis of the biochemical model provided a prediction on the experimental conditions (i.e. inducer levels) within which we could expect to see hysteresis. However, using the conventional 1:100 dilution procedure for propagating the induced culture we repeatedly failed to observe significant hysteresis.
We therefore hypothesized that the observation of hysteresis was obscured by some phenomenon specific to the culture propagation conditions. We hypothesized that a) there should be some batch propagation conditions under which hysteresis would be observable, b) the lack of hysteresis in other cases would be a result of a rapid dilution of the gene product that occurs during exponential growth after resuspension (causing some cells to switch OFF), and c) hysteresis could be further confounded due to the difference in growth rates between the ON and OFF phenotypes. Presumably, if the OFF phenotype grew at a faster rate owing to a smaller burden on the cell, the OFF phenotype would outcompete the ON phenotype. In other words, an engineered gene circuit would impose an additional metabolic burden on the host cell and would constitute a strong selective pressure against itself within a population.
The design of the experiment therefore involved determining the precise range of inducer concentrations that would result in hysteresis, independent determination of growth rates of ON and OFF phenotypes, modification of the dilution process as a way to control for the differences in growth rates between the ON and OFF phenotypes and determining the relationship between the dilution process and observed hysteresis.
Plasmids for the positive feedback gene network
Plasmids used in this study []
kan r P LtetO-1 – luxR Δori p15A
pGN23 (intermediate construction)
cm r P luxI ori ColE1
pGN69 (intermediate construction)
cm r P luxI – GFP[tagless] ori ColE1
cm r P luxI – GFP[tagless]
– luxR Δori ColE1
The plasmid pGN12 is a derivative of the plasmid pPROTet.E 6xHN (Clontech, Mountain View, CA). The ColE1 origin of pPROTet.E 6xHN was replaced with the p15A origin from pZA34-luc  using the restriction sites XbaI and SacI, and by swapping the chloramphenicol resistance with kanamycin resistance from pZE21 . The luxR Δ gene is a deletion mutant of the luxR gene from Vibrio fischeri. (referred to as luxRΔ2-162) by Nistala et al. . It was obtained PCR amplification using the plasmid pLuxRI2 as a template. The native luxR protein is a 230 aa chain which is allosterically activated by the autoinducer acyl homoserine lactone (AHL). luxRΔ2-162 is a truncated form of that protein that retains only the DNA-binding, C-terminal domain of the protein. Deleting the N-terminal domain prevents it from interfering with DNA binding and yields an AHL-independent transcription activator [4, 25, 26]. The luxR Δ2-162 PCR product was digested with EcoRI and SalI and sub-cloned into the EcoRI and SalI cut-sites of the modified pPROTet.E plasmid described above, yielding pGN12.
The pGN68 plasmid was also based on pPROTet.E. The luxI-GFP transcriptional fusion was amplified using the promoter region of the plasmid pluxGFPuv  as a template. The resulting fragment was cloned into pPROTet.E using the restriction sites EcoRI and AatII yielding plasmid pGN23. The green fluorescent protein was amplified from pPROBE-gfp[tagless] . The resulting fragment was then cloned into the EcoRI and BamHI restriction sites of the pGN23, yielding the plasmid pGN69. Subsequently the luxR Δ2-162 PCR product described above was digested with BamHI and NotI and sub-cloned into pGN69 yielding pGN68.
A schematic of the gene circuit is shown in Figure 1. The inducer aTc prevents the tetracycline-induced transcriptional repressor TetR from binding to the P LtetO-1 promoter through allosteric interaction thereby relieving repressed transcription from the trigger plasmid. The inducer aTc is a non-toxic analog of tetracycline. It does not inhibit cell growth at exposures of less than 100 ng/ml . The transcription of luxR Δ proceeds in a manner dependent on the level of aTc induction, but independent of cell density. The gene product LuxR Δ promotes its own expression by binding to the PluxI promoter on the feedback plasmid and constituting a positive feedback. GFP expressed from the same promoter is used to measure the transcriptional activity of the PluxI promoter.
Bacterial strains and growth conditions
All cultures were grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth (tryptone: 10 g/L, yeast extract: 5 g/L, and NaCl: 10 g/L). The cultures were incubated at 37 °C. The E. coli strain used was GN100 (F–ilvG rfb-50 rph-1ΔenvZ :: FRT attBλ::[P N25 – tetR lacI q spcR]). Strain GN100 is a derivative of MG1655 with the chromosomal integration of the TetR/LacI expression cassette from DH5 αZ1. This strain constitutively expresses TetR thereby tightly repressing any genes under the control of the P LtetO-1 promoter in the absence of anhydrotetracycline (aTc). Details of the strain construction are published elsewhere . The following antibiotics were added to the growth media: chloramphenicol (34 μg/mL) and kanamycin (40 μg/mL).
Before initiating experiments, cultures were grown overnight (∼12 h) from freezer stock in 2 mL of LB media with chloramphenicol and kanamycin. Subsequently, fresh media along with antibiotics was inoculated with cells from the overnight culture to a dilution of 1:100 to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of approximately 0.05. A Tecan infinite m200 96-well microplate reader (Männedorf, Switzerland) was used to measure optical density and fluorescent intensity (FI) of a 200 μl sample, with excitation at 488 nm and emission at 520 nm and 9 spatially-distributed reads per well. The fluorescent measurements are reported using relative fluorescence units (RFU), defined as fluorescent intensity normalized by optical density. Experiments were performed using three samples in all cases. For kinetic measurements, fluorescent intensity and optical density measurements were taken every hour. Between measurements, the 96-well plate was agitated on the built in, 2 mm amplitude orbital shaker until approximately 3 m before the next measurement. The temperature of the well plate was maintained at 37±0.5 °C using the built-in temperature controller in the microplate reader.
All flow cytometry experiments were performed using a BD Biosciences LSR II flow cytometer (San Jose, CA). Flow cytometry samples were prepared by centrifuging and resuspending the entire culture in 1 ml ice cold PBS. The samples were stored on ice until measurements were taken. A minimum of 10,000 events were recorded using the high flow setting. Analysis of flow cytometry data was performed in FCS Express Version 3 and R®;, a statistical analysis environment.
The hysteresis experiments were performed as follows: First, eight cultures were inoculated by diluting 1:100 from the overnight culture into 2 ml of fresh LB media and antibiotics. Cultures were grown for 2 h to an OD of ∼0.5 and then induced using aTc concentrations of 0, 0.1, 1, 5, 10, and 25 ng/mL. Three cultures were started using an aTc concentration of 25 ng/mL due to the large volume of this sample required for the subsequent hysteresis experiments.
Samples were thoroughly mixed and 200 μL of the samples were placed in a 96-well plate for kinetic experiments. Cultures at induction levels of 0, 0.1, 1, 5 and 10 ng/mL aTc were replicated three times whereas the cultures induced at 25 ng/mL aTc had twenty seven 200 μL samples placed into wells. 4 h after induction, one 200 μL sample was taken from each induction level. We ensured the sample being taken had its OD and FI readings within ±1 standard deviation of the population average OD and FI. These samples were prepared for flow cytometry using the procedure described above. 12 h after induction one 200 μL sample was again taken from each induction level and prepared for flow cytometry. These samples provided the baseline induction behavior for the circuit.
To test for hysteresis, the samples induced with 25 ng/ml aTc were diluted 12 h after induction. Four wells (800 μL total) were pooled together, centrifuged at 15000 ×g and the supernatant was discarded. The sample was resuspended and washed in PBS, centrifuged and resuspended in an 800 μL solution of LB, antibiotics, and 25 ng/mL aTc. This procedure was repeated on five sets of four wells, each set being resuspended in a solution of 10, 5, 1, 0.1, or 0 ng/mL aTc. Thus, six 800 μL samples were created, all of which had a history of induction at 25 ng/mL aTc, followed by resuspending in a reduced concentration of the inducer corresponding to 0, 0.1, 1, 5, 10, and the control case of 25 ng/mL aTc.
From each 800 μL sample, three 200 μL samples were placed into microplate wells. These three samples formed dilution group A. The average number of cells per well from the original four wells that formed the 800 μL sample was the same average number of cells per well for the new three wells. Thus, the dilution for group A was 1:1. (Note - in our case 1:1 dilution means 100% of the cells in the original suspension are retained in the solution. In theory, this implies that the solution is already at carrying capacity.)
From each 800 μL sample, 60 μL was mixed with a 540 μL solution of LB, antibiotics, and the appropriate (i.e. consistent with the parent culture) concentration of aTc. This solution was mixed and placed into three microplate wells (200 μL each). These three samples formed dilution group B. One-tenth of the average number of cells per well from the original four wells that formed the 800 μL sample was the initial number of cells for these three new wells. Therefore the dilution for group B was 1:10, or 10% of the cells from the original sample were retained in the new solution.
Finally, from each 800 μL sample, 6 μL was mixed with a 594 μL solution of LB, antibiotics, and the appropriate concentration of aTc. This solution was mixed and placed into three microplate wells (200 μL each). These three samples formed dilution group C. The dilution for group C was 1:100, which means 1% of the cells from the sample were propagated further.
In summary, cells that were previously incubated at the high induction level (25 ng/mL aTc) were washed and resuspended at six different induction levels (0, 0.1, 1, 5, 10, and 25 ng/mL aTc). Each induction level contained samples inoculated using dilution ratios of 1:1, 1:10, or 1:100. There were three 200 μL samples at each induction level and dilution for a total of 54 samples. These samples were grown in microplate wells during a kinetic experiment with measurements taken every hour.
Four hours after the dilution procedure, one 200 μL sample was taken from each group at each induction level and prepared for flow cytometry. Twelve hours after the dilution procedure, another 200 μL sample was taken from each group at each induction level and prepared for flow cytometry. All flow cytometry samples were analyzed at the same time, two hours after the collection of the last flow cytometry sample. In the interim, samples were stored on ice.
Gene expression dynamics at the single cell level
In Equation 1, an inducer s 0 activates transcription of a gene g in a linear fashion. The gene product g promotes its own expression, thereby establishing positive feedback within the system. The degradation rate of g depends on its own concentration and is assumed to be a linear function with degradation constant k 2. The model constant k 1 is the rate at which g is expressed by the inducer s 0. The constant k 3 governs the maximum expression level of the self-inducible promoter. Finally, k 4 is the concentration of g needed to achieve half-maximum response of the self-inducible promoter. The Hill coefficient of 2 in the nonlinear term captures the cooperative behavior of the LuxR Δ dimer. The value of 2 for the Hill coefficient is derived from literature .
where, , , , and .
It is worth noting that the above biochemical model is a very minimalistic description of the synthetic gene circuit. It assumes a linear expression rate with respect to the inducer, which is a reasonable expression for the range of 0.02-10 ng/ml induction for our circuit. It represents transcription, translation and mRNA degradation as a lumped parameter k 3. The model also assumes a first-order degradation rate that is simply proportional to the amount of the product at time t. Most of these model parameters are doubtless functions of the state of the cell and of the culture as a whole. We also explored a more complex model (see Additional file 1: section S1.3 to separate gene product degradation rates into individual dilution and decay parameters. However rather than pursue the route of building a complex, systems biology based approach to resolving the inconsistencies of experimental observation with the simplistic model, we approached the problem from the perspective of stochastic population dynamics in cell culture.
Here, N ON and N OFF are population sizes of the ON and OFF phenotypes, ρ ON and ρ OFF are the respective growth rates and K is the carrying capacity. The coefficients α and β determine the nature of interaction between the ON and OFF subpopulations. For neutral competition, . For a discussion about competitive Lotka-Volterra models, see Additional file 1: Section S2.1 and .
The basic Lotka-Volterra competitive model does not cover the case where an organism changes from one ‘species’ to another. As shown in Figure 4, in our system any given cell may switch between the ON and OFF phenotypes with a given probability. Thus in the population dynamics model, the rate of change the ON or OFF population is dependent upon not only the intrinsic growth rate of the phenotype, but also on the change in the population through phenotype switching. If p ON and p OFF are the probabilities of turning ON and OFF respectively, then the total number of ON cells is the weighted sum of ON cells that remain ON and OFF cells that turn ON. Therefore we replace N ON with (1-p OFF )N ON +p ON N OFF , and similarly N OFF with (1-p ON )N OFF +p OFF N ON . Note that the probability terms p ON and p OFF cancel out in the competition term in the parenthesis for .
The above equations are autonomous - i.e. the growth rates do not depend upon time. An analysis of the model is shown in Additional file 1: Section S2.
Results and discussion
Determining rate constants and predicting hysteresis
For the data in Figure 5, numerical derivatives were computed and fitted to Equation 1 to compute the rate constants k 1 through k 4. The nonlinear regression analysis and model constants are detailed in Additional file 1: Section S3. For the various induction levels, the corresponding dimensionless r and s parameters were calculated. Significantly, the data suggests that the fitted value of r is 0.26 ±0.06, which is well below 0.5, the level below which the system should display irreversibly hysteretic behavior. The value of r predicts that the switching threshold for the system is at approximately 2.4 ng/ml, which agrees with the data; no GFP expression is seen for 1 ng/ml, but the expression becomes apparent at 5 ng/ml. The biochemical model predicts that once the circuit is switched ON (induced at > 2.4 ng/ml), the GFP expression should retain the memory of the induction event even after removal of the inducer. We then proceeded to look for the conditions under which hysteresis should be apparent.
Searching for hysteretic behavior
Cells containing the positive feedback-based gene amplifier were grown at a high induction level (25 ng/mL aTc) for 12 h to a steady-state expression level. These cells were then centrifuged, washed, and resuspended into media at various inducer concentrations (0, 0.1, 1, 5, 10, and 25 ng/mL) and three dilutions (1:1, 1:10, and 1:100).
Dilutions were performed 12 h after inoculation to provide sufficient time for gene product concentration to reach steady-state. The slight linearly increasing trend shown in Figure 5 is due to the cultureÕs slight decrease in optical density after saturation, and not due to any significant change in GFP concentration within living cells. Dilutions were performed in the stationary phase because this is when GFP concentration is at steady-state.
However, it is important to note that the amount of hysteresis seen in the experiments seemed to be related to the dilution level. Cell populations that were not diluted (i.e. a 1:1 resuspension) showed the highest level of retained memory, whereas the 1:100 subculture shows almost no retained memory; a higher level of dilution resulted in a lower level of apparent hysteresis. This observation cannot be predicted from the simple biochemical model and has not been previously reported to the best of our knowledge.
To determine whether the reduction in relative fluorescence was due to the reduction in the average fluorescence per cell, or the reduction in the proportion of cells displaying the ON phenotype, the cell populations of Figure 6A were also analyzed by flow cytometry. Figure 6B shows the percentage of cells that are in the ON state after resuspending at the lower inducer levels. The primary change among the three dilution groups is the proportion of cells in each population that are ON, although we observed that there is a small reduction in the amount of expression per cell (i.e. mode of the distribution) for the higher dilutions. (See Figure S8 in Additional file 1 as an example). This reduction may be due to dilution of GFP; the 1:1 culture has limited capacity to dissipate the gene product by way of dilution whereas the magnitude of the dilution rate in 1:10 and 1:100 cultures is likely greater.
When hysteresis is quantified as the proportion of cells within a population that are ON, as in Figure 6B, the trends for each dilution group are similar to when hysteresis is quantified using relative fluorescence, as in Figure 6A. However, there is a small discrepancy between the relative magnitudes of hysteresis between each dilution group. Figure 6A shows that group B (1:10) shows a lower value for relative fluorescence than group A (1:1), but Figure 6B shows that group B (1:10) has a higher proportion of ON cells than group A (1:1). This is because although dilution group A had a lower proportion of ON cells within each population compared to group B, the median fluorescence level for the ON cells was higher. See Additional file 1: Section S4 for further clarification.
Determining bounds on the switching probabilities
Figures 6A and 6B show that the appearance of hysteresis is related to the dilution factor, and not just on the biochemical model of gene expression. It appears that the dilution factor masks the hysteresis to a significant extent, such that at subculture dilutions of 1:100, hysteretic behavior is almost completely obliterated.
If the ON or OFF state of the gene circuit were stably heritable, we should expect the same proportion of ON cells in each of the three dilution factors. However, if either 1) the OFF phenotype grows faster than the ON phenotype, or 2) the gene circuits switch to the OFF phenotype by dropping below the unstable point shown in Figure 2, then the population would trend towards an increasing OFF phenotype. To determine whether OFF phenotypes grew faster than the ON phenotypes, we sorted a population of cells induced at 5 ng/ml. We used the lowest practical concentration of aTc to produce a bimodal distribution so as to have roughly equal numbers of individuals in the ON and OFF phenotypes. Additionally, the low inducer concentration also minimizes imposing any additional burden (a documented cause of loss-of-function mutants in engineered circuits ) on the cell due to excessive GFP production.
Figure 7 shows that the logistic model from Equation 3 is a reasonable approximation of the growth data for the individual subpopulations, and that the ρ, K and N 0 parameters for the ON and OFF subpopulations are not significantly different. The growth rate ρ is in fact somewhat smaller for the OFF population, although the carrying capacity K is not statistically significantly larger.
In addition to growth rates, flow cytometry was used to characterize the phenotypic distribution at 4 h after sorting (corresponding to the fastest growth rate) and after 12 h, at the end of the experiment. The results of the distribution were as follows: In case of the OFF population at the end of 12 h only 3% of the cells had turned ON. We interpret data as the fraction of the population which cannot be turned ON at an induction level of 5 ng/ml.
For the initially ON population, after 4 h, only 1% of the ON cells showed any expression. At the end of 12 h, 72% of the cells showed fluorescence expression. This number is significantly higher than the ∼15% of cells that are ON after an induction of the naïve cells at similar (5ng aTc) induction levels. The overall higher number suggests that the observation of 1% ON cells after 4 h is a temporary effect. There are two possible reasons why the gene expression appears to temporarily vanish. Firstly, an induction level of 5 ng/ml is only slightly higher than 2.4 ng/ml, the predicted location of the OFF to ON transition threshold. Thus it is likely that at that concentration the positive feedback delays the onset of expression and most cells are in the process of turning ON at 4 h. The second possibility is a likely greater magnitude of growth-mediated dilution in the early stages of the culture that retards the accumulation of the LuxRΔ and GFP gene products. Although the possibility of very different protein degradation / expression rates in different stages of a batch culture well-known in E. coli[35–37], its importance to the characterization and dynamics of synthetic gene circuits is largely overlooked.
While the cell sorting experiment above was not designed to be a test for hysteresis, but rather to measure growth rates for the different ON and OFF populations, the results suggest that the increased dilution of the transcription factors during the exponential growth phase can significantly change the observed levels of gene expression and present a source of inconsistency with the simplistic biochemical model.
Analysis of the stochastic behavior of the cells induced at 5 ng/ml provides a lower bound on the ON to OFF transition probability of the gene circuit. As a comparison, when cells were induced at 10 and 25 ng/ml aTc concentrations and resuspended in a 1:1 dilution we observed that between 47 and 59% of the cells retained the ON phenotype, as compared to 72% when induced at 5 ng/ml. It is conceivable that at the higher induction levels of 10 and 25 ng/ml the likelihood of a cell switching to OFF may be higher owing to the additional metabolic burden imposed by the higher induction rate. However it is difficult to directly test this hypothesis because at higher induction levels the majority of the cells are ON to begin with and it is not possible to get a large enough sample of the OFF phenotypes to investigate comparative growth rates.
Interpretation of the competitive model and model estimates
Although we used the values of and in modeling the competition based on Equation 5, it is important to note that there is a difference between the estimates denoted with the primes and the terms p ON and p OFF in Equation 5. Specifically, the estimates denote the total proportion of cells that have switched phenotypes at the end of an observational interval of 12 h, whereas the model considers p ON and p OFF as instantaneous, differential probabilities, which are obtained in the limit as the observation interval goes to zero.
In addition to the stochastic interpretation, the switching probabilities are analogous to hazard rates seen in reliability theory because the probability of an OFF to ON transition is very close to zero. In other words, the OFF state is an absorbing state representing the eventual failure of the gene circuit. In our model, the hazard rate may be interpreted as the instantaneous conditional probability that a cell switches its phenotype from state A to another state B in the instant after time t given that it persisted in state A until time t. It has units of s -1. Our model implies the simplest case of a constant hazard rate, which implies an exponentially decreasing survival rate of the ON phenotypes which is readily seen in Figure 8.
An important, but unsurprising consequence of both the stochastic or survival models for the population is worth reiterating: Over a long enough observation interval the expression of GFP at the population level will degrade to zero if there is no selection pressure acting in favor of the circuit. It is known that the greater the metabolic burden on the circuit, the shorter will be its functional life . The eventual degradation of the circuit implies the following question: Does hysteresis even exist in our system? In other words, can we distinguish between the noisy, stochastic switching between the ON and OFF phenotypes in a bistable circuit from the gradual loss-of-function failure due to evolutionary instability? We think the answer is yes, based on the results of the cell sorting experiment where cells were induced at 5 ng/ml. Cells that were ON were regrown in fresh media. After 12 h 72% of the cells were ON. This number agrees very well with the expected half life of tagless GFP of 24 hours , which would imply an ON rate of about 70% after 12 hours. Also, this number is significantly higher than the ∼15% of cells that are ON after an induction of naïve cells at similar conditions. Both experiments have the same noisy circuit, so in the former case, significantly higher proportion of ON cells may be attributed to deterministic hysteresis.
We note that neither the simple biochemical model nor the population dynamics overlayer fully capture the complex network dynamics. The observation that only 1% of the cells subcultured from the ON phenotype were seen to express GFP 4 h after sorting suggests that cell growth seems to occur with a higher priority than heterologous protein expression in the exponential phase of the culture, thus questioning the assumption of a linear dilution / decay rate in the biochemical model (Equation 2). Indeed, the decay rate k 2 used in the equation is a composite rate consisting of dilution due to cell division (which halves the concentration of LuxR in the cell) and the intrinsic decay rate of the dimer itself. The switch to a fast growth rate could dramatically change the composition of k 2. This coefficient k 2 is the gateway to fuller integration between the population dynamics and gene expression models. We explored the possibility of reworking the biochemical model to decouple k 2 into two independent dilution and decay terms (See Additional file 1 section S1.3. The resulting model is difficult to analyze, and better experiments will have to be devised to quantify and support the notion of changing decay rates. We leave this avenue open for future investigation.
The source of discontinuity in dilution / decay rates may be found in the different sigma factor regimes during the growth and stationary phases of a culture. As far as we can tell, no systems biology models currently account for stationary phase behavior, although there are validated theories for stationary cultures under continuous culture conditions [22, 23]. The lack of a systems biology model for stationary response represents a significant gap in the current state of knowledge. To build a more accurate model we would not only have to modify the decay to be a function of the state of the culture, but would also have to account for the time dependence of the transition probabilities. In the interim however, a probabilistic measure as described here can recapitulate the effect of dilution rates in the population dynamics model.
A competitive population dynamics model supports the idea that in a limited resource environment the so called K-strategist (competitor that shows an increased resource efficiency) will always outcompete other competitors, even if the competitors display a faster growth rate and even if the efficiency (the K value or carrying capacity) of the K-strategist is only marginally higher. In our system, the primary determinant of the increasing OFF population was the switching rate between the ON and OFF phenotypes; any differences in the growth parameters between the phenotypes were smaller than the resolution of our experimental techniques. If the switch from ON to OFF may be interpreted as a K-strategy, since the OFF phenotypes no longer expend resources to express GFP, then the loss of function is consistent with accepted ideas in population dynamics.
Our experiments showed that the positive feedback-based gene amplifier was capable of producing a hysteretic response to a stimulus in a single cell, but the observation of hysteresis was significantly modulated by the stochastic transition to the OFF phenotype, and this effect was even higher when the cells were subjected to changes in growth conditions through subculturing. The dilution ratio used to propagate the cell culture determined the failure rate of the gene expression circuitry at the population level beyond the failure rate of the circuit at the single cell level. The higher the dilution rate, the faster was the observed failure.
More generally, in applications where a certain behavior is expected from a cell population (such as whole cell biosensors or cell-based computers), nonlinear changes in degradation and dilution of the gene products can lead to failure with respect to the desired operation of the gene circuit. The above experiments are an illustrative example of the interplay between gene expression and population dynamics. This interplay is expected to be complex and cannot be ignored if we are to design and build non-trivial, robust genetic circuits.
Stochasticity in gene expression and adaptation all but ensure that synthetic gene circuits will have a finite operational lifespan unless their operation is constantly under a positive selection pressure. Absent directed evolution, tools that allow the bioengineer to predict the durability and reliability of gene circuits will be a critical to advance synthetic biology towards industrial biotechnology. Population dynamics models provide an entry point into quantifying the probabilistic behavior of a population of cells over time scales of the order of the replication rate of the organism, which is intermediate between gene regulatory processes and the slower evolutionary processes. As such they serve an important need in modeling the performance over time scales relevant to applications of synthetic biology such as bioprocessing and metabolic engineering.
About the authors
Phillip Poisson received his bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Michigan at Ann-Arbor, and his master’s degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He currently works in Research and Engineering at Kimberly-Clark Corporation in Neenah, Wisconsin.
Kaustubh D. Bhalerao received his PhD in Biological Engineering in 2004 from the Department of Food, Agricultural and Biological Engineering at The Ohio State University in Columbus, Ohio. He joined the faculty at the Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering at University of Illinois as an assistant professor in 2005. He is currently an associate professor. His research interests include understanding evolution from the context of biological engineering, and the impact of nanotechnology on the environment. He is a member of two editorial boards.
The authors thank the National Science Foundation for their generous support for this work under the grant CCF-0943386. Many thanks to Mr. Vaisak Parekatt, Drs. Chris Rao, Chinmay Soman, Gustavo Caetano-Annoles, Goutam Nistala and Anil Wipat for helpful discussions and suggestions on improving the manuscript. We also thank the reviewers for their insightful and constructive comments.
- Xiong W, Ferrell J James E: A positive-feedback-based bistable ’memory module’ that governs a cell fate decision. Nature 2003,426(6965):460–465. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14647386] [PMID: 14647386]View Article
- Siciliano V, Menolascina F, Marucci L, Fracassi C, Garzilli I, Moretti MN, di Bernardo D: Construction and modelling of an inducible positive feedback loop stably integrated in a mammalian cell-line. PLoS, Comput Bio 2011,7(6):e1002074. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21765813] [PMID: 21765813]MathSciNetView Article
- Saini S, Ellermeier JR, Slauch JM, Rao CV: The role of coupled positive feedback in the expression of the SPI1 type three secretion system in Salmonella. PLoS, Pathog 2010,6(7):e1001025. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20686667] [PMID: 20686667]View Article
- Nistala GJ, Wu K, Rao CV, Bhalerao KD: A modular positive feedback-based gene amplifier. J Biol Eng 2010.,4(4): [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20187959] [PMID: 20187959]  [PMID: 20187959]
- Mondragón-Palomino O, Danino T, Selimkhanov J, Tsimring L, Hasty J: Entrainment of a population of synthetic genetic oscillators. Science (New York, N.Y.) 2011, 333:1315–1319. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21885786] [PMID: 21885786]View Article
- Czarnecka E, Verner FL, Gurley WB: A strategy for building an amplified transcriptional switch to detect bacterial contamination of plants. Plant Mol Bio 2012, 78:59–75. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22116654] [PMID: 22116654]View Article
- Zheng XD, Yang XQ, Tao Y: Bistability, probability transition rate and first-passage time in an autoactivating positive-feedback loop. PLoS One 2011,6(3):e17104.View Article
- Angeli D, Ferrell J James E, Sontag ED: Detection of multistability, bifurcations, and hysteresis in a large class of biological positive-feedback systems. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2004,101(7):1822–1827. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14766974] [PMID: 14766974]View Article
- Kramer BP, Fussenegger M: Hysteresis in a synthetic mammalian gene network. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2005,102(27):9517–9522. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15972812] [PMID: 15972812]View Article
- Pomerening JR, Sontag ED, Ferrell J James E: Building a cell cycle oscillator: hysteresis and bistability in the activation of Cdc2. Nat Cell Biol 2003,5(4):346–351. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12629549] [PMID: 12629549]View Article
- Williams JW, Cui X, Levchenko A, Stevens AM: Robust and sensitive control of a quorum-sensing circuit by two interlocked feedback loops. Mol Syst Biol 2008, 4:234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/msb.2008.70 View Article
- Ozbudak EM, Thattai M, Lim HN, Shraiman BI, Van Oudenaarden A: Multistability in the lactose utilization network of Escherichia coli. Nature 2004,427(6976):737–740. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02298 View Article
- Maeda YT, Sano M: Regulatory dynamics of synthetic gene networks with positive feedback. J Mol Biol 2006,359(4):1107–1124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2006.03.064 View Article
- Banerjee S, Bose I: Functional characteristics of a double positive feedback loop coupled with autorepression. Phys Biol 2008,5(4):046008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1478-3975/5/4/046008 View Article
- Mitrophanov AY, Groisman EA: Positive feedback in cellular control systems. Bioessays 2008,30(6):542–555. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bies.20769 View Article
- Tan C, Marguet P, You L: Emergent bistability by a growth-modulating positive feedback circuit. Nat Chem Biol 2009,5(11):842–848. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.218 View Article
- To TL, Maheshri N: Noise can induce bimodality in positive transcriptional feedback loops without bistability. Science 2010,327(5969):1142–1145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1178962 View Article
- Wang B, Kitney RI, Joly N, Buck M: Engineering modular and orthogonal genetic logic gates for robust digital-like synthetic biology. Nat Commun 2011, 2:508. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1516 View Article
- Marguet P, Tanouchi Y, Spitz E, Smith C, You L: Oscillations by minimal bacterial suicide circuits reveal hidden facets of host-circuit physiology. PLoS One 2010,5(7):e11909. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011909 View Article
- Kwok R: Five hard truths for synthetic biology. Nature 2010,463(7279):288–290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/463288a View Article
- The ten grand challenges of synthetic life Syst Synth Biol 2011,5(1–2):1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11693-011-9084-5
- Klumpp S, Zhang Z, Hwa T: Growth rate-dependent global effects on gene expression in bacteria. Cell 2009,139(7):1366–1375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.12.001 View Article
- Scott M, Gunderson CW, Mateescu EM, Zhang Z, Hwa T: Interdependence of cell growth and gene expression: origins and consequences. Science 2010,330(6007):1099–1102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1192588 View Article
- Lutz R, Bujard H: Independent and tight regulation of transcriptional units in Escherichia coli via the LacR/O, the TetR/O and AraC/I1-I2 regulatory elements. Nucleic Acids Res 1997,25(6):1203–1210.View Article
- Choi SH, Greenberg EP: The C-terminal region of the Vibrio fischeri LuxR protein contains an inducer-independent lux gene activating domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991,88(24):11115–11119.View Article
- Choi SH, Greenberg EP: Genetic dissection of DNA binding and luminescence gene activation by the Vibrio fischeri LuxR protein. J Bacteriol 1992,174(12):4064–4069.
- You L, Weiss R, Arnold FH, Cox R S 3rd: Programmed population control by cell-cell communication and regulated killing. Nature 2004,428(6985):868–871.View Article
- Miller WG, Leveau JH, Lindow SE: Improved gfp and inaZ broad-host-range promoter-probe vectors. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2000,13(11):1243–1250.View Article
- Lewis J, Slack JM, Wolpert L: Thresholds in development. J Theor Biol 1977,65(3):579–590.View Article
- Strogatz SH: Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos with Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engineering. 1994. Reading: Perseus Books Publishing
- Sayut DJ, Kambam PKR, Sun L: Noise and kinetics of LuxR positive feedback loops. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2007,363(3):667–673. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.09.057 View Article
- Tian T, Burrage K: Stochastic models for regulatory networks of the genetic toggle switch. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006,103(22):8372–8377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507818103 View Article
- Begon M, Harper J, Townsend C: Ecology: Individuals, Populations and Communities. Cambridge: Blackwell Science Ltd; 1996.View Article
- Sleight SC, Bartley BA, Lieviant JA, Sauro HM: Designing and engineering evolutionary robust genetic circuits. J Biol Eng 2010, 4:12.View Article
- Bradley MD, Beach MB, de Koning APJ, Pratt TS, Osuna R: Effects of Fis on Escherichia coli gene expression during different growth stages. Microbiology 2007,153(Pt 9):2922–2940.View Article
- Chang DE, Smalley DJ, Conway T: Gene expression profiling of Escherichia coli growth transitions: an expanded stringent response model. Mol Microbiol 2002,45(2):289–306.View Article
- Lange R, Hengge-Aronis R: Identification of a central regulator of stationary-phase gene expression in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 1991, 5:49–59.View Article
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.