Skip to main content
Fig. 6 | Journal of Biological Engineering

Fig. 6

From: Re-using biological devices: a model-aided analysis of interconnected transcriptional cascades designed from the bottom-up

Fig. 6

Analysis via NBM of the measured HSL-dependent output in the re-designed circuit variants, without Monitor cassette. a Circuit description. All of them are available with an RFP expression system downstream of the output promoter (indicated in the text with the r suffix). Symbols are described in Figure 1, except white ovals that represent a weak RBS (BBa_B0033), used in these circuits to decrease tetR expression. b Fitting of the training set circuit X2Twr. Estimated parameters were: αT = 3.03 (4%), KT = 63.14 (17%), ηT = 0.99 (10%), δT = 0.02 (>100%), where symbols have the same meaning as in Table 1 and CVs are reported in brackets. c-d) Prediction of the test set circuit X1TwLr and XrepTwLr, respectively. In panels B-D, circles represent the average measured value and error bars represent the 95% confidence intervals of the mean. Solid line represents the median output of the model calculated via Monte Carlo simulations for each HSL concentration tested. Dashed dark red lines are the 95% confidence bands of the output distribution. Dashed light red lines are the 95% confidence bands of the output distribution calculated after multivariate sensitivity analysis

Back to article page