Skip to main content
Download PDF

Influence of gold nanoparticle surface chemistry and diameter upon Alzheimer’s disease amyloid-β protein aggregation

Journal of Biological Engineering volume 11, Article number: 5 (2017) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Deposits of aggregated amyloid-β protein (Aβ) are a pathological hallmark of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Thus, one therapeutic strategy is to eliminate these deposits by halting Aβ aggregation. While a variety of possible aggregation inhibitors have been explored, only nanoparticles (NPs) exhibit promise at low substoichiometric ratios. With tunable size, shape, and surface properties, NPs present an ideal platform for rationally designed Aβ aggregation inhibitors. In this study, we characterized the inhibitory capabilities of gold nanospheres exhibiting different surface coatings and diameters.

Results

Both NP diameter and surface chemistry were found to modulate the extent of aggregation, while NP electric charge influenced aggregate morphology. Notably, 8 nm and 18 nm poly(acrylic acid)-coated NPs abrogated Aβ aggregation at a substoichiometric ratio of 1:2,000,000. Theoretical calculations suggest that this low stoichiometry could arise from altered solution conditions near the NP surface. Specifically, local solution pH and charge density are congruent with conditions that influence aggregation.

Conclusions

These findings demonstrate the potential of surface-coated gold nanospheres to serve as tunable therapeutic agents for the inhibition of Aβ aggregation. Insights gained into the physiochemical properties of effective NP inhibitors will inform future rational design of effective NP-based therapeutics for AD.

Background

In 1901, Alois Alzheimer examined a patient experiencing multiple neurological symptoms, including pronounced memory loss [1], marking the first diagnosis of what is now the most common neurodegenerative disorder, Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Amyloid plaques, comprised of aggregated amyloid-β (Aβ) protein [2] and found throughout the cerebral cortex [1], are a pathological hallmark of AD. While monomeric Aβ is inert [3], Aβ aggregates induce neurotoxicity [4], inhibit neuronal long-term potentiation [5–7], induce synapse loss [8], and disrupt memory and complex learned behavior [9]. As a result, halting Aβ aggregation is one promising therapeutic strategy for AD. However, extensive investigation of small molecules and peptides as inhibitors of Aβ aggregation has failed to yield a successful therapeutic, necessitating the exploration of novel therapeutic agents.

Nanoparticles (NPs) have emerged as attractive therapeutic and diagnostic tools with applications in medical imaging, analytics, and drug delivery [10–14]. NPs can be synthesized from a wide range of materials including metals, polymers, and carbon-based molecules [11–14]. Furthermore, the ease with which NP size, shape, and surface properties are controlled [10–14] render NPs an ideal tunable platform for therapeutic applications.

Among the growing body of potential therapeutic applications for NPs is their ability to modulate amyloid protein aggregation [15–19]. Inhibition of Aβ aggregation, specifically, has been reported for NPs ranging in size from <10 nm to several hundred nanometers and exhibiting diverse surface chemistries [20–28]. Moreover, these effects have been observed at picomolar NP concentrations and substoichiometric ratios of NP to protein. While a wide array of small molecules and peptides can disrupt Aβ aggregation [29, 30], none have been as effective as NPs at substoichiometric ratios, thus increasing their potential for delivery of therapeutically effective concentrations to the brain. However, variations in NP size and surface chemistry can result in the contrasting promotion of Aβ aggregation [21, 23, 24, 31–33]. Thus, there exists a need to better understand the impact of NP physiochemical properties upon Aβ aggregation.

Using spherical NPs that vary in surface coating and size, this study investigates the effect that NP surface chemistry, charge, and diameter have upon Aβ aggregation. Gold was selected as the NP core material because gold NPs are readily synthesized, easily functionalized, and highly stable against oxidative dissolution [34–36]. Examination of four NP surface chemistries as well as three different NP diameters revealed that electric charge, surface chemistry, and size all modulate the ability of gold nanospheres to inhibit Aβ aggregation. While NP diameter and surface chemistry impact the extent of inhibition, electric charge determines the ability to influence aggregate morphology. In particular, smaller, anionic NPs are superior inhibitors, halting aggregation at substoichiometric ratios as low as 1:2,000,000 with the protein. Theoretical calculations suggest that such low stoichiometry may be achieved through NP-induced alterations to local solution conditions, including pH and charge density. Together, these findings identify surface-coated gold NPs as potential therapeutic agents for AD and provide insight into the physiochemical properties displayed by NPs that effectively inhibit Aβ aggregation.

Results and discussion

As part of the emergence of NPs in medical applications, development of NPs as inhibitors of amyloid protein aggregation has garnered attention [15–19]. With the ability to vary NP physiochemical properties, including material, size, and charge, NPs offer a tunable platform to modulate amyloid protein aggregation [37, 38]. However, the influence of NP characteristics on protein aggregation is poorly understood [15–17]. This study characterizes the inhibition of Aβ aggregation by gold nanospheres with varying surface chemistry and diameter. A cellular assay was used to probe the neurotoxicity of synthesized NPs, while a fluorescent amyloid-binding dye and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were employed to characterize NP-induced alterations in Aβ aggregate formation and morphology, respectively. These investigations define a role for NP size, electric charge, and surface chemistry in determining inhibitory capabilities, and a theoretical model provides insight into the possible mechanism of inhibition.

Toxicity of surface-coated gold NPs

Toxicity of gold NPs is dependent upon their size, shape, and surface coating [39–43]. To probe the biocompatibility of synthesized NPs as therapeutic agents, their potential to elicit a toxic response was evaluated within human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells, a widely used model for the study of prospective AD therapeutics. Following 24 h exposure of SH-SY5Y cells to surface-coated NPs, cellular metabolic activity was assessed using 2,3-bis(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide (XTT) reduction. At NP concentrations of 100 pM and 200 pM, cellular viability remained >95% following incubation with 18 nm NPs displaying citrate, poly(acrylic acid) (PAA), or polyelectrolytes poly(allylamine)hydrochloride (PAH) surface chemistries (Fig. 1a). In contrast, 18 nm cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) coated NPs reduced cellular viability to less than 20%, a viability level comparable to cells treated with 2% Triton-X, thus indicating their propensity to induce toxicity. This result is congruent with observations that CTAB-coated nanoparticles are toxic toward other cell types [39–41], while their further overcoating reduces the toxic effects [39, 41]. When cells were incubated in the presence of PAA-coated NPs of varying size, NPs 8 nm and 18 nm in diameter did not elicit toxicity. In contrast, 40 nm PAA-coated NPs were toxic, with both 100 pM and 200 pM NPs reducing cellular viability to less than 10% (Fig. 1b). Similarly, other studies have shown size-dependent toxicity for nanoparticles, with larger sizes eliciting a more toxic response [42, 43]. Results here demonstrate that NP toxicity toward SH-SY5Y cells is influenced by both surface chemistry and size and that several NPs considered in the current study are inert in SH-SY5Y cultures.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Toxicity of surface-coated gold NPs. SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells were incubated (24 h) alone (negative control) or in the presence of 100 pM (closed bars) or 200 pM (open bars) NPs. a Treatment with 18 nm NPs coated with citrate, CTAB, PAA, or PAH. b Treatment with 8 nm, 18 nm, or 40 nm NPs coated with PAA. Treatment with 2% Triton-X (Tr-X) served as a positive control. Cellular viability was assessed using XTT reduction. Results are shown as the percentage of viable cells relative to the negative control and represent the mean of 2–3 independent experiments, performed with 6 replicates. Error bars represent SEM. *p < 0.001 vs. negative control

Full size image

Effect of surface-coated gold NPs on ThT fluorescence detection of Aβ1–40 aggregates

The plasmonic nature of NPs imparts an ability to absorb and scatter light, which may enhance or quench fluorescent signals [44]. This property presents the possibility that NPs could alter fluorescence of thioflavin T (ThT), which binds the β-sheet structure characteristic of fibrillar Aβ aggregates to yield a shifted, enhanced fluorescence and is thus commonly used to monitor the progression of aggregation. To ensure that observed differences in ThT fluorescence accurately reflect changes in Aβ aggregate formation, ThT fluorescence was assessed for 5 μM pre-formed fibrillar Aβ1–40 aggregates incubated for 2 h in the absence (control) or presence of 5–200 pM surface-coated NPs. These concentrations are representative of diluted solutions used for monitoring aggregation. Among 18 nm NPs, ThT fluorescence detection of Aβ1-40 fibrils was unaltered by NPs displaying citrate, PAA, and PAH surface chemistries (Fig. 2a). In contrast, CTAB-coated NPs significantly quenched ThT fluorescence detection of aggregated Aβ1-40 at concentrations of 50 pM and higher. When PAA-coated NPs of varying diameter were compared, neither 8 nm nor 18 nm NPs altered the detection of Aβ1-40 fibrils by ThT; however, ThT fluorescence detection was again significantly quenched by the presence of 40 nm PAA-coated NPs (Fig. 2b). Other studies have shown that small molecule inhibitors of Aβ aggregation can also reduce ThT fluorescence detection of Aβ aggregates, although via a different mechanism of binding competition [45, 46]. These studies advocate caution toward the unmitigated use of ThT fluorescence to study Aβ aggregation inhibitors. As a result, assessment of the effect of 18 nm CTAB-coated NPs and 40 nm PAA-coated NPs was limited to TEM analysis.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Effect of surface-coated gold NPs on ThT fluorescence detection of Aβ1-40 aggregates. Aβ1–40 fibrils diluted in 40 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0) to a final concentration of 5 μM were combined with 8.75 μM ThT and incubated (2 h) alone (control) or with 5 pM, 10 pM, 20 pM, 50 pM, 100 pM, or 200 pM NPs. a Incubation with 18 nm NPs displaying citrate (■), CTAB (●), PAA (▲), or PAH (♦) surface chemistries. b Incubation with 8 nm (▶), 18 nm (▲), or 40 nm (◀) NPs coated with PAA. ThT fluorescence was evaluated, and results are expressed as the fraction of ThT fluorescence observed for the control. Error bars represent SEM, n = 3. † p < 0.05 and *p < 0.001 vs. control

Full size image

18 nm surface-coated gold NPs inhibit Aβ1–40 monomer aggregation and alter fibril morphology

The effect of synthesized NPs on Aβ aggregation was evaluated using Aβ1–40, the most abundant monomeric isoform in vivo [47] as well as the dominant species found in amyloid plaques [48]. Aggregation of 40 μM monomeric protein was stimulated by continuous agitation, and ThT fluorescence was used to monitor the formation of β-sheet amyloid aggregates. Aβ1–40 aggregation yielded a characteristic growth pattern displaying an initial lag phase, indicative of nucleation, which was followed by rapid aggregate growth that ceased at equilibrium, as evidenced by plateau of the fluorescence signal (Fig. 3a). Inhibition of Aβ1–40 aggregation by NPs was quantified via changes in the lag time and equilibrium plateau. Extension of the lag time occurs early in aggregation and is indicative of an increased time to nucleation. Lag extension was calculated as a fold-change, relative to the control, in the time at which ThT fluorescence first increases. Reduction of the plateau fluorescence is evidenced at equilibrium and indicates a decrease in the total quantity of aggregates containing β-sheet structure. Plateau reduction was calculated as the percentage decrease in ThT fluorescence at equilibrium.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effect of 18 nm surface-coated gold NPs on Aβ1–40 monomer aggregation. Aβ1–40 monomer diluted to 40 μM in 40 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0) was aggregated alone (control, Ο) or in the presence of surface-coated NPs. a Aggregation in the presence of 200 pM NPs displaying citrate (■), PAA (▲), or PAH (♦) surface chemistries. b Aggregation in the presence of 200 pM (♦), 100 pM (), or 20 pM () PAH-coated NPs. Monomer aggregation was induced by continuous agitation and monitored periodically via ThT fluorescence. ThT fluorescence, expressed as the fraction of the control equilibrium plateau, is plotted versus relative time, which is the fraction of the control lag time. Results are representative of 3–5 independent experiments

Full size image

When monomer aggregation was stimulated in the presence of NPs, none of the NPs were capable of delaying nucleation to extend the lag time. However, at 200 pM several NPs did decrease the quantity of β-sheet aggregates formed at equilibrium (Fig. 3a). Aggregates formed in the presence of 200 pM citrate- or PAH-coated NPs exhibited a 19 ± 8% and 59 ± 9% reduction of the equilibrium plateau, respectively (Table 1). The most pronounced effect was observed with PAA-coated NPs, which completely abrogated aggregation. Inhibition of Aβ1–40 aggregation by surface-coated NPs was also observed to be dose dependent (Table 1). Inhibition by PAH-coated NPs decreased from nearly 60% at a concentration of 200 pM to less than 45% at a concentration of 20 pM (Fig. 3b, Table 1), and citrate-coated NPs were ineffective at concentrations below 200 pM (Table 1). PAA-coated NPs, however, continued to fully abrogate inhibition at concentrations as low as 20 pM, or a 1:2,000,000 substoichiometric ratio of NPs to Aβ1-40 (Table 1). To ensure these inhibitory effects were characteristic of the NPs and not just surface coatings, monomer aggregation was also performed in the presence of 100 μM solubilized sodium citrate, CTAB, PAA, or PAH; each failed to elicit any inhibitory effect (results not shown).

Table 1 Percent inhibition of Aβ1–40 monomer aggregation observed in the presence of surface-coated NPsa,b
Full size table

To confirm inhibition of Aβ1–40 aggregation by synthesized NPs as well as to further investigate changes in aggregate morphology, TEM images were acquired following a time point after which aggregation reactions had reached equilibrium. Aggregates formed in the absence of NPs exhibit a network of filamentous fibrils comprised of single or multiple strands (Fig. 4a, d). This morphology is in agreement with other studies of Aβ aggregation [20, 24, 27, 33].

Fig. 4
figure 4

Effect of surface-coated gold NPs with different surface coatings and diameters on Aβ1-40 aggregate morphology. Aβ1–40 monomer diluted to 40 μM in 40 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0) was aggregated alone (control, panels a, d) or in the presence of 200 pM citrate-coated (panel b), PAH-coated (panel c), CTAB-coated (panel e), or PAA-coated (panel g) NPs 18 nm in diameter. Additionally, monomer was aggregated in the presence of 200 pM PAA-coated NPs exhibiting diameters of 8 nm (panel f) or 40 nm (panel h). Monomer aggregation was induced by continuous agitation, and the control reaction was monitored periodically via ThT fluorescence. Upon evidence of equilibrium, samples were gridded and visualized by TEM. Results are representative of 2 independent experiments. Images are shown relative to a scale bar of 500 nm at 100,000x (panels a-c, e-g) or 75,000x (panels d, h) magnification

Full size image

When Aβ1-40 aggregates were formed in the presence of 200 pM citrate-coated (Fig. 4b) or PAH-coated (Fig. 4c) NPs, the quantity of aggregates was reduced compared to the control. These results corroborate the plateau reductions observed via ThT fluorescence. TEM additionally facilitated examination of the influence of CTAB-coated NPs on Aβ1–40 aggregation, for which analysis by ThT fluorescence was precluded. Aggregates formed in the presence of 200 pM CTAB-coated NPs exhibited a reduction in aggregate quantity (Fig. 4e), demonstrating that these NPs can also inhibit Aβ1–40 aggregation. When Aβ1–40 aggregation was stimulated in the presence of 200 pM 18 nm PAA-coated NPs, an absence of filamentous aggregates was observed (Fig. 4g), substantiating the ability of these NPs to abrogate aggregation. Together, TEM results confirm the relative inhibitory capabilities of surface-coated NPs observed by ThT fluorescence as well as the complete inhibition imparted by PAA-coated NPs.

While the most effective inhibitors were NPs coated with anionic PAA, NPs exhibiting both negative and positive surface charges inhibited Aβ aggregation. This observation agrees with previous studies that have described both anionic and cationic NPs as inhibitors of protein aggregation [20, 21, 23–25, 28, 49–55]. Among the NPs examined within the current study, however, those with anionic citrate and PAA coatings were more effective inhibitors than those with cationic CTAB and PAH coatings. This finding aligns with other studies that have observed superior inhibitory capabilities by anionic NPs over cationic NPs [20, 21, 23, 25, 28]. Among anionic NPs, PAA-coated particles exhibited superior inhibitory capabilities over citrate-coated particles. Other studies also report variances in inhibition of amyloid protein aggregation by NPs displaying different surface chemistries with the same electric charge [22, 25]. In comparison to monomeric citrate, polymeric PAA will exhibit molecular reorganization transitions with the local solution environment [56]. These transitions can result in spatially dependent changes to physical parameters that may facilitate inhibition, as discussed in the next section.

TEM images further revealed that NPs with different coatings exert different effects on aggregate morphology. While aggregates formed in the presence of anionic citrate-coated NPs exhibited a morphology similar to the control (Fig. 4b), aggregates formed in the presence of cationic NPs demonstrated altered morphologies. PAH-coated NPs induced the formation of an increased number of thin, elongated aggregate structures (Fig. 4c), while CTAB-coated NPs induced the formation of short, thick associated aggregates (Fig. 4e). Thus, these results demonstrate the ability of cationic, but not anionic, NPs to influence aggregate morphology. Other studies have described similar NP-induced changes in aggregate structure, with a diverse array of morphologies reported [20, 21, 26, 49, 50, 52, 54, 55]. However, these observations are not confined to cationic NPs.

NP size influences inhibition of Aβ1–40 monomer aggregation by PAA-coated gold NPs

The complete inhibition of Aβ1–40 aggregation observed in the presence of 18 nm PAA-coated NPs prompted further experimentation to elucidate the effect of PAA-coated NP size on inhibitory capabilities. PAA-coated NPs exhibiting diameters of 8 nm, 18 nm, and 40 nm were examined for their ability to attenuate Aβ1–40 aggregation. These NP sizes were selected to span the range of sizes able to cross the blood–brain barrier and undergo clearance from the body [57, 58]. Similar to the inhibition observed in the presence of 18 nm PAA-coated NPs, the smaller 8 nm NPs reduced the equilibrium plateau by >90% at concentrations as low as 20 pM (Fig. 5, Table 1), demonstrating their effectiveness as Aβ aggregation inhibitors. This result was corroborated by the absence of aggregate material observed via TEM (Fig. 4f). In contrast, 40 nm PAA-coated NPs were ineffective at preventing the formation of Aβ1-40 aggregates. Although these NPs quenched ThT fluorescence (Fig. 2), precluding their assessment via ThT, their inability to prevent aggregate formation was evidenced by TEM images displaying a similar quantity of aggregate material (Fig. 4h) compared to the control of equivalent magnification (Fig. 4d). These results demonstrate that only smaller PAA-coated NPs are capable of serving as effective inhibitors of Aβ1–40 aggregation. This observation is in agreement with other studies reporting variations in inhibition of amyloid protein aggregation by NPs exhibiting different sizes [21, 28]. As in the current study, larger NPs are consistently less effective inhibitors, suggesting that high NP curvature may be needed to impart inhibitory capabilities.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Effect of 8 nm PAA-coated gold NPs on Aβ1–40 monomer aggregation. Aβ1-40 monomer diluted to 40 μM in 40 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0) was aggregated alone (control, Ο) or in the presence of 8 nm PAA-coated NPs at concentrations of 200 pM (▶), 100 pM (), or 20 pM (). Monomer aggregation was induced by continuous agitation and monitored periodically via ThT fluorescence. ThT fluorescence and time values are presented as in Fig. 3. Results are representative of 3 independent experiments

Full size image

Both 8 nm and 18 nm PAA-coated nanospheres were capable of abrogating Aβ aggregation at a substoichiometric ratio of 1:2,000,000. While other studies have proposed NP-protein binding as the mode of aggregation inhibition, this extremely low NP to monomer ratio suggests that these surface-coated NPs are acting via another mechanism. Moreover, TEM images show that NPs did not co-localize with aggregates and that morphological changes were not isolated to regions near NPs. A similar lack of interaction with aggregated protein is also reported for other NP types [20, 50, 54, 59]. These observations suggest a dynamic interaction between NP-localized protein and the bulk solution.

Theoretical calculations indicate that surface charged NPs alter local solution conditions that can influence Aβ aggregation

The strikingly low stoichiometry at which inhibition of Aβ1–40 aggregation by PAA-coated NPs was observed as well as the lack of association between NPs and Aβ aggregates within TEM images suggest that interactions other than sequestration of Aβ1–40 monomer at the NP surface may play a role in the inhibitory capabilities of surface-coated NPs. A potential mechanism that can account for these congruent observations exists in the effect that the curved, charged NP surface has upon local solution conditions, including pH and ionic strength [21], both of which significantly influence Aβ aggregation [60–62]. Specifically, Aβ aggregation is attenuated in the presence of acidic and basic pH [61, 63–65], while aggregation is promoted by the presence of a higher ionic strength, or charge density [62, 66–70]. Moreover, both solution pH [60, 65, 66, 71] and ionic strength [66, 67, 70] can modulate aggregate morphology. To explore this possibility, a self-consistent molecular field theory (SCMFT) was developed and implemented to describe molecular organization near the curved, charged NP surface. Theoretical calculation of the equilibrium concentrations of solution species allowed for the determination of local solution pH and charge density.

Theoretical calculations demonstrate pronounced changes in solution pH and solution charge density near the surface of 18 nm NPs suspended in 40 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0) (Fig. 6). Cationic NP surfaces induce an elevated local solution pH and a negative charge density, while anionic NP surfaces depress the local solution pH and induce a positive solution charge density. These changes result from the system localizing counterions near the NP surface to balance the NP surface charge. The magnitude of NP-induced alterations is consistent with conditions under which altered Aβ aggregation would occur [37, 61, 62]. Moreover, a greater absolute magnitude of surface charge produces more pronounced changes in the local solution molecular organization, leading to larger deviations from the bulk solution. This observation is congruent with prior experimental reports in which NPs with a higher absolute magnitude of surface charge imparted greater inhibition [22, 25]. For NPs with a large magnitude of surface charge, these effects extend several nanometers beyond the NP surface. This spatial pervasiveness would allow protein to exchange between local and bulk solution conditions. Such exchange may impede the formation of organized amyloid structures or disrupt those structures formed within the bulk solution. Previous observations support such a dynamic exchange [25, 59, 72] along with the dominance of nanoscale surface properties over the bulk solution [16], which may be partly due to the persistence of protein structures formed near the NP surface [72].

Fig. 6
figure 6

Effect of NP surface charge on local solution pH and charge density. The equilibrium molecular organization near the surface of NPs was modeled using a SCMFT incorporating water, hydronium, hydroxide, chloride, and Tris. Theoretical calculations were performed for 18 nm NPs in the presence of 40 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0) for NPs exhibiting a positive (black lines) or negative (grey lines) surface charge with absolute surface charge (σq) magnitudes of 4 e/nm2 (solid lines), 1 e/nm2 (dashed lines), or 0.1 e/nm2 (dotted lines). Local solution pH (panel a) and charge density (ρq) (panel b) are plotted as a function of distance from the NP surface

Full size image

Interestingly, an asymmetry exists about the bulk solution values, with cationic NPs eliciting a more pronounced change in charge density. This asymmetry is a manifestation of differences between counterions that become localized to balance the NP surface charge. The cationic NP surface draws hydroxide and chloride to its surface, with chloride being the predominant species, while the anionic NP surface draws hydronium and Tris to its surface, with Tris predominating. In the latter case, because Tris is in chemical equilibrium with its local environment through the acid dissociation reaction (tr + ⇄ tr + H +), the fraction of Tris that is charged, and hence capable of balancing the anionic NP surface charge, is interdependent upon the local pH environment, thus causing a distinct effect upon molecular organization. This asymmetric magnitude in charge density combined with the opposing changes in both local solution pH and charge density induced by anionic vs. cationic NPs may contribute to the distinct inhibitory effects observed for anionic and cationic NPs, including the stronger inhibitory capabilities of anionic NPs and the ability of cationic, but not anionic, NPs to alter aggregate morphology. Moreover, polymeric PAA can produce steric hindrance that results in a preference for localizing protons over bulky ions, such as Tris. The result is a more pronounced effect on the local pH compared to citrate, congruent with the enhanced effectiveness of PAA-coated vs. citrate-coated NPs.

Overall, theoretical results parallel experimental observations in both the current and prior studies, supporting the hypothesis that inhibition of amyloid aggregation may stem, in part, from NP-induced changes in local solution conditions.

Conclusion

This study provides evidence that electric charge, surface chemistry, and size can modulate the ability of gold nanospheres to inhibit Aβ aggregation. NP surface chemistry and size influence the extent of inhibition, while electric charge defines NP ability to alter aggregate morphology. Overall, PAA-coated NPs 18 nm and smaller are superior inhibitors, abrogating aggregation at substoichiometric ratios as low as 1:2,000,000 with Aβ. Such low stoichiometric ratios coupled with the lack of NP-aggregate association prompted investigation for NP-induced changes in local solution conditions to influence aggregation. A theoretical model describing changes in local solution pH and charge density displays congruencies with experimental observations to support this potential mechanism. Cell viability assays further demonstrated that the most effective NP inhibitors are non-toxic. Together, these findings identify surface-coated gold nanospheres as potential tunable therapeutic agents for the inhibition of Aβ aggregation and provide insight into the physiochemical properties of effective NP inhibitors.

Methods

Materials

Aβ1–40 was purchased from AnaSpec, Inc. (San Jose, CA). Gold (III) trichloride hydrate HAuCl4 · 3H2O, trisodium citrate, sodium borohydride (NaBH4), ascorbic acid, CTAB, ThT, Triton-X 100, XTT, and all cell culture media and reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). The polyelectrolytes PAH and PAA were also obtained from Sigma-Aldrich and used without further purification. Sodium chloride (NaCl) was purchased from Fisher Scientific. Uranyl acetate was purchased from Electron Microscopy Sciences (Hatfield, PA).

Surface-coated gold NP synthesis and characterization

Surface-coated gold NPs of average core diameters 8 nm, 18 nm, and 40 nm were synthesized using a previously reported seeded growth method [73], described in detail within Additional file 1. NPs in their citrate-capped form were either used for experimentation, coated with CTAB, which forms a bilayer on the surface causing the trimethylammonuim headgroup to face the aqueous solvent, or electrostatically over-coated in a layer-by-layer fashion with PAA and PAH [74]. Therefore, at pH 7, the nanomaterials would present either a cationic (CTAB and PAH) or anionic (citrate and PAA) surface. NPs were characterized using TEM and UV–vis absorbance spectroscopy.

Toxicity of surface-coated gold NPs

Potential toxicity of surface-coated NPs was probed in human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells (American Type Culture Collection, Manassus, VA). Cellular reduction of XTT was employed to evaluate cellular metabolic activity following NP exposure. Cells, sustained and prepared for experiments as described in Additional file 1, were incubated (24 h) with NPs (100 pM or 200 pM) diluted into medium, with medium alone (negative control), or with 2% Triton-X 100 in medium (positive control). Following incubation, cells were washed and treated (24 h) with 0.33 mg/mL XTT and 8.3 μmol/L phenozene methyl sulfate. Metabolically active cells reduce XTT to an orange formazan product, for which absorbance (450 nm) was measured using a BioTek Synergy 2 microplate reader (Winooski, VT). Results are reported as a percentage of the negative control following background (medium containing XTT) subtraction.

Aβ1–40 monomer aggregation

Aβ1–40 monomer aggregation assays were performed similar to previously described methods [75]. Briefly, Aβ1–40 monomer, purified via size exclusion chromatography (SEC) as described in Additional file 1, was diluted to 40 μM in 40 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0) and agitated (vortex, 800 rpm, 25 °C) alone (control) or with 20-200 pM NPs. Periodically, a 20 μL aliquot was removed and combined with 140 μL of 10 μM ThT, an amyloid-binding dye that yields a shifted, enhanced florescence upon recognition of the characteristic β-sheet structure of fibrillar Aβ aggregates. Fluorescence (excitation = 450 nm, emission = 470-500 nm) was evaluated using a Perkin-Elmer LS-45 luminescence spectrometer (Waltham, MA). Fluorescence values were calculated as the integrated area under the emission curve with baseline (ThT alone) subtraction and plotted vs. aggregation time.

ThT detection of Aβ1–40 aggregates in the presence of surface-coated gold NPs

To ensure that NPs do not compromise ThT detection, ThT fluorescence was evaluated for 5 μM Aβ1–40 pre-formed fibrils, prepared as described in Additional file 1, in the presence of 8.75 μM ThT and 5-200 pM NPs (concentrations congruent with those of diluted samples used to monitor aggregation). ThT fluorescence was measured after 2 h incubation. Compromised ThT detection was evaluated as a decrease in ThT fluorescence relative to that observed for fibrils in the absence of NPs and expressed as the fraction of ThT fluorescence observed for the control.

Morphological evaluation of Aβ1–40 aggregates

To evaluate Aβ1–40 aggregate morphology, monomer aggregation reactions were prepared for TEM following the time point at which the control reaction reached equilibrium (assessed via ThT). As described previously [75], a 10 μL sample was placed on a 300 mesh formvar-carbon supported copper grid (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA). After 3 min, the sample was wicked away from the bottom side of the grid using filter paper. Sample application was repeated twice, and grids were allowed to air dry (24 h). Gridded samples were stained (10 min) with 2% aqueous uranyl acetate, excess stain was wicked away, and grids were allowed to dry (24 h). Imaging was performed using a JEOL 200CX TEM (Tokyo, Japan) with an accelerating voltage of 120 kV. Blinded observation of samples with random selection of grid areas was implemented to reduce bias.

Statistical analysis

Using GraphPad Prism 5 software (San Diego, CA), the effect of NPs on aggregation was evaluated using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Dunnett’s post-test, and the effect of NPs on ThT detection was evaluated using a two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-test. p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Thermodynamic model

A SCMFT was developed and parameterized to model the equilibrium molecular organization near the interface of surface-coated NPs suspended in 40 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0). The NP surface was modeled as a sphere bearing a fixed surface charge where spherical symmetry was imposed. Five mobile species (water, hydronium, hydroxide, chloride, and Tris) were accounted for explicitly to capture the solvent environment. The chemical equilibrium of Tris is integrated into the model and made dependent upon the local solvent environment. The concentration of chloride was parameterized to achieve electroneutrality within the bulk solution. The SCMFT is expressed mathematically as a dimensionless free energy functional. The equilibrium molecular organization is determined through the minimization of this functional. Further details can be found in Additional file 1. This model was used to predict the molecular organization near the NP surface, from which the pH and charge density were determined a function of distance from the NP surface. Calculations were performed for 18 nm NPs with surface charges ranging from 4 to −4 e/nm2.

Abbreviations

AD:

Alzheimer’s disease

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

Aβ:

Amyloid-β protein

BSA:

Bovine serum albumin

CTAB:

Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide

NP:

Nanoparticle

PAA:

Poly(acrylic acid)

PAH:

Poly(allylamine)hydrochloride

SCMFT:

Self-consistent molecular field theory

SEC:

Size exclusion chromatography

TEM:

Transmission electron microscopy

ThT:

Thioflavin T

XTT:

2,3-bis(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide

References

  1. Alzheimer A. Uber eine eigenartige Erkrankung der Hirnrinde. Allg Zeits Psychi- atry Psych Med. 1907;64:146–8.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hardy JA, Higgins GA. Alzheimer’s disease: the amyloid cascade hypothesis. Science. 1992;256:184–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hardy J, Selkoe DJ. The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease: progress and problems on the road to therapeutics. Science. 2002;297:353–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lorenzo A, Yankner BA. β-amyloid neurotoxicity requires fibril formation and is inhibited by congo red. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91(December):12243–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barghorn S, Nimmrich V, Striebinger A, Krantz G, Keller P, Janson B, Bahr M, Schmidt M, Bitner RS, Harlan J, Barlow E, Ebert U, Hillen H. Globular amyloid β-peptide1-42 oligomer - A homogenous and stable neuropathological protein in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurochem. 2005;95:834–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen QS, Kagan BL, Hirakura Y, Xie CW. Impairment of hippocampal long-term potentiation by Alzheimer amyloid β-peptides. J Neurosci Res. 2000;60:65–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nomura I, Kato N, Kita T, Takechi H. Mechanism of impairment of long-term potentiation by amyloid β is independent of NMDA receptors or voltage-dependent calcium channels in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. Neurosci Lett. 2005;391:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shankar GM, Bloodgood BL, Townsend M, Walsh DM, Selkoe DJ, Sabatini BL. Natural oligomers of the Alzheimer amyloid-β protein induce reversible synapse loss by modulating an NMDA-type glutamate receptor-dependent signaling pathway. J Neurosci. 2007;27:2866–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cleary JP, Walsh DM, Hofmeister JJ, Shankar GM, Kuskowski MA, Selkoe DJ, Ashe KH. Natural oligomers of the amyloid-β protein specifically disrupt cognitive function. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:79–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gao J, Gu H, Xu B. Multifunctional magnetic nanoparticles: design, synthesis, and biomedical applications. Acc Chem Res. 2009;42:1097–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cormode DP, Skajaa T, Fayad ZA, Mulder WJM. Nanotechnology in medical imaging: probe design and applications. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009;29:992–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Faraji AH, Wipf P. Nanoparticles in cellular drug delivery. Bioorganic Med Chem. 2009;17:2950–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tong S, Fine EJ, Lin Y, Cradick TJ, Bao G. Nanomedicine: Tiny particles and machines give huge gains. Ann Biomed Eng. 2014;42:243–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tonga GY, Saha K, Rotello VM. 25th anniversary article: Interfacing nanoparticles and biology: New strategies for biomedicine. Adv Mater. 2014;26:359–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang C, Zhang M, Mao X, Yu Y, Wang CX, Yang YL. Nanomaterials for reducing amyloid cytotoxicity. Adv Mater. 2013;25:3780–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mahmoudi M, Kalhor HR, Laurent S, Lynch I. Protein fibrillation and nanoparticle interactions: opportunities and challenges. Nanoscale. 2013;5:2570–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fei L, Perrett S. Effect of Nanoparticles on Protein Folding and Fibrillogenesis. Int J Mol Sci. 2009;10:646–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zaman M, Ahmad E, Qadeer A, Rabbani G, Khan RH. Nanoparticles in relation to peptide and protein aggregation. Int J Nanomedicine. 2014;9:899–912.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Busquets MA, Sabaté R, Estelrich J. Potential applications of magnetic particles to detect and treat Alzheimer’s disease. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2014;9:538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liao YH, Chang YJ, Yoshiike Y, Chang YC, Chen YR. Negatively charged gold nanoparticles inhibit Alzheimer’s amyloid-β fibrillization, induce fibril dissociation, and mitigate neurotoxicity. Small. 2012;8:3631–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mahmoudi M, Quinlan-Pluck F, Monopoli MP, Sheibani S, Vali H, Dawson KA, Lynch I. Influence of the physiochemical properties of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles on amyloid β protein fibrillation in solution. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2013;4:475–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Saraiva AM, Cardoso I, Saraiva MJ, Tauer K, Pereira MC, Coelho MAN, Möhwald H, Brezesinski G. Randomization of amyloid-β-peptide(1–42) conformation by sulfonated and sulfated nanoparticles reduces aggregation and cytotoxicity. Macromol Biosci. 2010;10:1152–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Saraiva AM, Cardoso I, Pereira MC, Coelho MAN, Saraiva MJ, Möhwald H, Brezesinski G. Controlling amyloid-β peptide(1–42) oligomerization and toxicity by fluorinated nanoparticles. ChemBioChem. 2010;11:1905–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cabaleiro-Lago C, Quinlan-Pluck F, Lynch I, Dawson KA, Linse S. Dual effect of amino modified polystyrene nanoparticles on amyloid β protein fibrillation. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2010;1:279–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rocha S, Thünemann AF, Pereira MDC, Coelho M, Möhwald H, Brezesinski G. Influence of fluorinated and hydrogenated nanoparticles on the structure and fibrillogenesis of amyloid beta-peptide. Biophys Chem. 2008;137:35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yoo SI, Yang M, Brender JR, Subramanian V, Sun K, Joo NE, Jeong SH, Ramamoorthy A, Kotov NA. Inhibition of amyloid peptide fibrillation by inorganic nanoparticles: Functional similarities with proteins. Angew Chemie - Int Ed. 2011;50:5110–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cabaleiro-Lago C, Quinlan-Pluck F, Lynch I, Lindman S, Minogue AM, Thulin E, Walsh DM, Dawson KA, Linse S. Inhibition of amyloid β protein fibrillation by polymeric nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:15437–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mirsadeghi S, Shanehsazzadeh S, Atyabi F, Dinarvand R. Effect of PEGylated superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) under magnetic field on amyloid beta fibrillation process. Mater Sci Eng C. 2016;59:390–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Doig AJ. Peptide inhibitors of beta-amyloid aggregation. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel. 2007;10:533–9.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Re F, Airoldi C, Zona C, Masserini M, La Ferla B, Quattrocchi N, Nicotra F. Beta amyloid aggregation inhibitors: small molecules as candidate drugs for therapy of Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Med Chem. 2010;17:2990–3006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ma Q, Wei G, Yang X. Influence of Au nanoparticles on the aggregation of amyloid-β-(25–35) peptides. Nanoscale. 2013;5:10397–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ghavami M, Rezaei M, Ejtehadi R, Lotfi M, Shokrgozar MA, Abd Emamy B, Raush J, Mahmoudi M. Physiological temperature has a crucial role in amyloid beta in the absence and presence of hydrophobic and hydrophilic nanoparticles. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2013;4:375–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wu W-H, Sun X, Yu Y-P, Hu J, Zhao L, Liu Q, Zhao Y-F, Li Y-M. TiO2 nanoparticles promote β-amyloid fibrillation in vitro. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;373:315–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Murphy CJ, Gole AM, Stone JW, Sisco PN, Alkilany AM, Goldsmith EC, Baxter SC. Gold nanoparticles in biology: Beyond toxicity to cellular imaging. Acc Chem Res. 2008;41:1721–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tiwari PM, Vig K, Dennis VA, Singh SR. Functionalized Gold Nanoparticles and Their Biomedical Applications. Nanomaterials. 2011;1:31–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang Z, Ma L. Gold nanoparticle probes. Coord Chem Rev. 2009;253:1607–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Uskoković V. Entering the era of nanoscience: Time to be so small. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2013;9:1441–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Alkilany AM, Lohse SE, Murphy CJ. The gold standard: Gold nanoparticle libraries to understand the nano-bio interface. Acc Chem Res. 2013;46:650–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wan J, Wang JH, Liu T, Xie Z, Yu XF, Li W. Surface chemistry but not aspect ratio mediates the biological toxicity of gold nanorods in vitro and in vivo. Sci Rep. 2015;5:11398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Tarantola M, Pietuch A, Schneider D, Rother J, Sunnick E, Rosman C, Pierrat S, Sönnichsen C, Wegener J, Janshoff A. Toxicity of gold-nanoparticles: synergistic effects of shape and surface functionalization on micromotility of epithelial cells. Nanotoxicology. 2011;5:254–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Alkilany AM, Nagaria PK, Hexel CR, Shaw TJ, Murphy CJ, Wyatt MD. Cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of gold nanorods: Molecular origin of cytotoxicity and surface effects. Small. 2009;5:701–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Yao M, He L, McClements DJ, Xiao H. Uptake of gold nanoparticles by intestinal epithelial cells: impact of particle size on their absorption, accumulation, and toxicity. J Agric Food Chem. 2015;63:8044–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Rosário F, Hoet P, Santos C, Oliveira H. Death and cell cycle progression are differently conditioned by the AgNP size in osteoblast-like cells. Toxicology. 2016;368:103–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lakowicz JR. Radiative decay engineering 5: Metal-enhanced fluorescence and plasmon emission. Anal Biochem. 2005;337:171–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hudson SA, Ecroyd H, Kee TW, Carver JA. The thioflavin T fluorescence assay for amyloid fibril detection can be biased by the presence of exogenous compounds. FEBS J. 2009;276:5960–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Moss MA, Varvel NH, Nichols MR, Reed DK, Rosenberry TL. Nordihydroguaiaretic acid does not disaggregate β-amyloid(1–40) protofibrils but does inhibit growth arising from direct protofibril association. Mol Pharmacol. 2004;66:592–600.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Gandy S. The role of cerebral amyloid β accumulation in common forms of Alzheimer disease. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:1121–9.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Guntert A, Dobeli H, Bohrmann B. High sensitivity analysis of amyloid-beta peptide composition in amyloid deposits from human and PS2APP mouse brain. Neuroscience. 2006;143:461–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Cabaleiro-Lago C, Szczepankiewicz O, Linse S. The effect of nanoparticles on amyloid aggregation depends on the protein stability and intrinsic aggregation rate. Langmuir. 2012;28:1852–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Hadas S, Georges B, Shlomo M. Synthesis and characterization of fluorinated magnetic core–shell nanoparticles for inhibition of insulin amyloid fibril formation. Nanotechnology. 2009;20:225106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Bellova A, Bystrenova E, Koneracka M, Kopcansky P, Valle F, Tomasovicova N, Timko M, Bagelova J, Biscarini F, Gazova Z. Effect of Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles on lysozyme amyloid aggregation. Nanotechnology. 2010;21:65103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Sardar S, Pal S, Maity S, Chakraborty J, Halder UC. Amyloid fibril formation by β-lactoglobulin is inhibited by gold nanoparticles. Int J Biol Macromol. 2014;69C:137–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Sen S, Konar S, Pathak A, Dasgupta S, DasGupta S. Effect of functionalized magnetic MnFe2O4 nanoparticles on fibrillation of human serum albumin. J Phys Chem B. 2014;118:11667–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Naik A, Kambli P, Borana M, Mohanpuria N, Ahmad B, Kelkar-Mane V, Ladiwala U. Attenuation of lysozyme amyloid cytotoxicity by SPION-mediated modulation of amyloid aggregation. Int J Biol Macromol. 2015;74:439–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Hsieh S, Chang CW, Chou HH. Gold nanoparticles as amyloid-like fibrillogenesis inhibitors. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces. 2013;112:525–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Jans H, Jans K, Lagae L, Borghs G, Maes G, Huo Q. Poly(acrylic acid)-stabilized colloidal gold nanoparticles: synthesis and properties. Nanotechnology. 2010;21:455702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Choi HS, Liu W, Misra P, Tanaka E, Zimmer JP, Itty Ipe B, Bawendi MG, Frangioni JV. Renal clearance of quantum dots. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25:1165–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Koffie RM, Farrar CT, Saidi L-J, William CM, Hyman BT, Spires-Jones TL. Nanoparticles enhance brain delivery of blood–brain barrier-impermeable probes for in vivo optical and magnetic resonance imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108:18837–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Linse S, Cabaleiro-Lago C, Xue W-F, Lynch I, Lindman S, Thulin E, Radford SE, Dawson KA. Nucleation of protein fibrillation by nanoparticles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:8691–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Wood SJ, Maleeff B, Hart T, Wetzel R. Physical, morphological and functional differences between pH 5.8 and 7.4 aggregates of the Alzheimer’s amyloid peptide Aβ. J Mol Biol. 1996;256:870–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Kobayashi S, Tanaka Y, Kiyono M, Chino M, Chikuma T, Hoshi K, Ikeshima H. Dependence pH and proposed mechanism for aggregation of Alzheimer’s disease-related amyloid-β(1–42) protein. J Mol Struct. 2015;1094:109–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Snyder SW, Ladror US, Wade WS, Wang GT, Barrett LW, Matayoshi ED, Huffaker HJ, Krafft GA, Holzman TF. Amyloid-beta aggregation: selective inhibition of aggregation in mixtures of amyloid with different chain lengths. Biophys J. 1994;67:1216–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Serpell LC. Alzheimer’s amyloid fibrils: structure and assembly. Biochim Biophys Acta - Mol Basis Dis. 2000;1502:16–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Barrow CJ, Yasuda A, Kenny PTM, Zagorski MG. Solution conformations and aggregational properties of synthetic amyloid β-peptides of Alzheimer’s disease. Analysis of circular dichroism spectra. J Mol Biol. 1992;225:1075–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Fraser PE, Nguyen JT, Surewicz WK, Kirschner DA. pH-dependent structural transitions of Alzheimer amyloid peptides. Biophys J. 1991;60:1190–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Stine WB, Dahlgren KN, Krafft GA, LaDu MJ. In vitro characterization of conditions for amyloid-β peptide oligomerization and fibrillogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:11612–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Isaacs AM, Senn DB, Yuan M, Shine JP, Yankner BA. Acceleration of amyloid β-peptide aggregation by physiological concentrations of calcium. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:27916–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Hilbich C, Kisters-Woike B, Reed J, Masters CL, Beyreuther K. Aggregation and secondary structure of synthetic amyloid βA4 peptides of Alzheimer’s disease. J Mol Biol. 1991;218:149–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Johansson AS, Berglind-Dehlin F, Karlsson G, Edwards K, Gellerfors P, Lannfelt L. Physiochemical characterization of the Alzheimer’s disease-related peptides Aβ1-42Arctic and Aβ1-42wt. FEBS J. 2006;273:2618–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Klement K, Wieligmann K, Meinhardt J, Hortschansky P, Richter W, Fändrich M. Effect of different salt ions on the propensity of aggregation and on the structure of Alzheimer’s Aβ(1–40) amyloid fibrils. J Mol Biol. 2007;373:1321–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Su Y, Chang PT. Acidic pH promotes the formation of toxic fibrils from β-amyloid peptide. Brain Res. 2001;893:287–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Giacomelli CE, Norde W. Influence of hydrophobic teflon particles on the structure of amyloid β-peptide. Biomacromolecules. 2003;4:1719–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Jana NR, Gearheart L, Murphy CJ. Seeding growth for size control of 5–40 nm diameter gold nanoparticles. Langmuir. 2001;17:6782–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Gole A, Murphy CJ. Polyelectrolyte-coated gold nanorods: Synthesis, characterization and immobilization. Chem Mater. 2005;17(c):1325–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Davis TJ, Soto-Ortega DD, Kotarek JA, Gonzalez-Velasquez FJ, Sivakumar K, Wu L, Wang Q, Moss MA. Comparative study of inhibition at multiple stages of amyloid-β self-assembly provides mechanistic insight. Mol Pharmacol. 2009;76:405–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation’s Research at Undergraduate Institutions Program (RUI, CHE-0701406 to R.M., C.J.M., and M.A.M.) and the Faculty Early Career Development Program (CAREER, CBET-0644826 to M.A.M.).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets acquired and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

KAM, DDS-O, RM, CJM, and MAM designed the study. SL, KSJ, VDL, LJ, NG, VMN, and SM synthesized and characterized the surface-coated gold NPs. KAM, DDS-O, ML, and KSJ characterized inhibitory properties of the surface-coated gold NPs. KP performed studies to determine toxicity of the surface-coated gold NPs. NvdM and MJU conceptualized and implemented the theoretical model. KAM, KP, and MAM wrote the manuscript. MU, RM, CJM, and MAM supervised various aspects of the project. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biomedical Engineering Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA

    Kelly A. Moore, Deborah D. Soto-Ortega, Mark J. Uline & Melissa A. Moss

  2. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of South Carolina, 2C02 Swearingen Engineering Center, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA

    Kayla M. Pate, Nicholas van der Munnik, Mark J. Uline & Melissa A. Moss

  3. Department of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA

    Mihyun Lim

  4. Department of Biological and Physical Sciences, South Carolina State University, Orangeburg, SC, 29117, USA

    Kaliah S. Jackson, Venetia D. Lyles, Lemeisha Jones, Nisha Glassgow, Vanessa M. Napumecheno, Shanee Mobley & Rahina Mahtab

  5. Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA

    Samuel Lohse & Catherine J. Murphy

Authors
  1. Kelly A. Moore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kayla M. Pate
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Deborah D. Soto-Ortega
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Samuel Lohse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nicholas van der Munnik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mihyun Lim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Kaliah S. Jackson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Venetia D. Lyles
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Lemeisha Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Nisha Glassgow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Vanessa M. Napumecheno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Shanee Mobley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Mark J. Uline
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Rahina Mahtab
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Catherine J. Murphy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Melissa A. Moss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melissa A. Moss.

Additional file

Additional file 1:

Supporting Information. (DOCX 42 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moore, K.A., Pate, K.M., Soto-Ortega, D.D. et al. Influence of gold nanoparticle surface chemistry and diameter upon Alzheimer’s disease amyloid-β protein aggregation. J Biol Eng 11, 5 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13036-017-0047-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13036-017-0047-6

Keywords

Journal of Biological Engineering

ISSN: 1754-1611