- Open Access
System Integration - A Major Step toward Lab on a Chip
© Sin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
- Received: 2 March 2011
- Accepted: 25 May 2011
- Published: 25 May 2011
Microfluidics holds great promise to revolutionize various areas of biological engineering, such as single cell analysis, environmental monitoring, regenerative medicine, and point-of-care diagnostics. Despite the fact that intensive efforts have been devoted into the field in the past decades, microfluidics has not yet been adopted widely. It is increasingly realized that an effective system integration strategy that is low cost and broadly applicable to various biological engineering situations is required to fully realize the potential of microfluidics. In this article, we review several promising system integration approaches for microfluidics and discuss their advantages, limitations, and applications. Future advancements of these microfluidic strategies will lead toward translational lab-on-a-chip systems for a wide spectrum of biological engineering applications.
- Microfluidic System
- Microfluidic Platform
- Recombinase Polymerase Amplification
- Pneumatic Control
Microfluidics is a multidisciplinary field investigating the behavior and the manipulation of small amounts of fluids with characteristic length scales from nanometers to hundreds of micrometers [1, 2]. The field has been under intensive development for over 20 years as a result of the emergence of microelectromechanical systems. The dramatic change in the length scale offer many new techniques due to the unique importance of phenomena at the microscale such as the domination of surface forces over inertial forces, the laminar nature of fluid flow, fast thermal relaxation and length scale matching with the electric double layer . From a technological point of view, microfluidics offers many advantages including low fluid volumes (less reagents and lower cost), short assay time, low power consumption, rapid generation of small liquid compartments and high degree of parallelization [4–11]. Despite the fact that the inherent advantages of microfluidics are highly promising for realizing the concept of lab-on-a-chip, microfluidics has not been widely adopted in biological engineering and medical applications. By now, the most successful portable bioanalytical platforms with the largest market share are test stripes, which were introduced in the middle of 1980s [12–14].
In the past decades, microfluidics has undergone rapid development with numerous new fabrication techniques and device designs. There are a large number of publications and patents of microfluidic devices functioning as pumps [12, 13], mixers [14–16], concentrators , and valves [18–20], which are the building blocks for creating functional bioreactors and lab-on-a-chip systems. Nevertheless, a major hurdle for transforming microfluidics into practical applications is the integration of these components into a fully automated platform that can be conveniently accessed by the end users . This is primarily due to the complexity of combining various components including bulky supporting equipments (e.g., pressure sources and cell culture modules), detection components (e.g., optics and engineering interfaces), and sample preparation modules (e.g., mixers and concentrators) into a single platform .
The major criteria for developing an integrated lab-on-a-chip system depend on the proposed applications and target markets of the products [23–39]. For example, it is widely believed that lab-on-a-chip technology will advance global health through the development of in vitro diagnostic devices for point-of-care testing (e.g., routine monitoring for chronic diseases and emergency testing for acute diseases) and advanced diagnostic devices in central laboratory testing [40–43]. In a central laboratory setting, sensitivity and specificity of the test are often the major considerations when supporting infrastructures are available and a high-cost, high-performance system is affordable. Due to the lack of sufficient trained personnel in remote locations (e.g., airports or train stations), diagnostic assays should allow automated operations by untrained personnel and the results should be easily interpreted by the end users. In resource-limited settings (e.g., a rural clinic), the cost, portability and shelf life represent the major constraints for the development of the system and the ability to transfer the test results to physicians in other locations for off-site diagnosis using the existing communication network is valuable . The chip designers, therefore, should consider these issues and requirements according to the target applications at the preliminary stage.
In the past decades, numerous microfluidic techniques have been developed for a wide spectrum of biological engineering applications. These microfluidic systems have been successfully applied in laboratory scale applications . However, most existing microfluidic systems are practically chip-in-a-lab, instead of lab-on-a-chip, and only possess limited functionalities . Recently, several microfluidic strategies are emerging for effective integration of multiple microfluidic components towards fully automated lab-on-a-chip systems for sophisticated biomedical analyses . In particular, capillary driven microfluidics, multilayer soft lithography, multiphase microfluidics, electrowetting-on-dielectric, electrokinetics, and centrifugal microfluidics are some of the most promising platforms for transforming microfluidics into various biological engineering applications. In this article, the basic principles, applications, strengths, and limitations of these microfluidic platforms are discussed.
Test strips introduced in the middle 1980s are currently the most successful portable diagnostic platform commercially available. The major advantages of test strips include simplicity, portability and cost effectiveness . In a test strip, the liquid transport is driven by capillary action of a fleece without the requirement of external transportation support. It offers single-use point-of-care diagnostics (qualitative or quantitative detection) such as cardiac marker assays and pregnancy test . On the other hand, there is a rapid development of paper-based microfluidic devices, which are also driven by the capillary effect, through micropatterning of test paper with hydrophobic polymers for channeling the fluid into different regions . Paper-based microfluidics has enhanced flexibility in the device design for versatile usage while the cost can be compatible to test strips.
The test stripes have been the most widespread commercial platform for a large number of on-site diagnostic applications for over 20 years. The simplest example is pH measurement with the litmus paper . More intricate structures such as fleece with multiple reactants and colorization or multiple fleeces with different zones of reactants can be applied in pregnancy tests, blood glucose monitoring, cardiovascular disease assays, and drug abuse tests. These detection platforms are already commercially distributed [66, 67] (Figure 1c). For paper-based microfluidics, one of the first applications is urinalysis for glucose and bovine serum albumin . Other bioassays include rapid blood typing  and salivary nitrite monitoring . With 3D paper-based microfluidics, testing 4 different samples for 4 different analytes has been demonstrated on a single device .
Strength and weakness of the platform
Capillary driven microfluidic platforms require only a simple actuation mechanism - capillary force with no pumping, valve or energy sources necessary. This makes system integration and on-site automated bioanalytical tests achievable. The devices are low-cost, small, and light weight making storage and transportation relatively easy. Furthermore, they can be disposed economically and safely by incineration. All these attractive features make capillary driven microfluidics a powerful platform for clinical diagnostics especially in resource-limited settings. However, the variations in viscosity and surface tension among different samples and changes in environmental conditions can significantly affect the wicking rate and the incubation time of the assays. Since active fluid control, e.g. mixing and concentration, is not available once the process starts, the efficiency could be a challenging issue for dilute samples. Furthermore, the shell-life of the reagents coated on the device surface, which could degrade over a certain period of time, can also influence the accuracy of the devices.
Paper-based microfluidics shares basic characteristics with test stripes. Although paper-based microfluidics is still in the developing stage, it shows a number of overwhelming characteristics over the conventional test strip. Firstly, multiplexing can be carried out simultaneously in different test zones on the paper without cross-contamination of the reagents. Secondly, on-site diagnostics for colorimetric assays can be easily achieved with cell phone cameras, scanners and other well-established communications infrastructure . Last but not least, the design of 3D paper-based microfluidics can potentially implement more complex diagnostic assays while preserving its economical nature. However, paper-based microfluidics also shares similar technical issues with test stripes. In addition, there is one issue related to reflectance detection. The digital pictures (assay results) can vary based on the lighting conditions, the resolution of the camera, and the focus of the picture . Color standards can be integrated in the device to eliminate this effect.
Multilayer soft lithography (MSL) applies pneumatic actuation for controlling large-scale microfluidic networks, which integrate thousands of fluidic components including mechanical valves, mixers, and pumps on a microfluidic chip . MSL are fabricated by bonding multiple layers of elastomer, e.g., polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), cast from micromachined molds . PDMS based microfluidic devices have several advantages over silicon or glass based systems including its low cost, deformability, and optical transparency. PDMS elastomer also shows good biocompatibility, impermeability to water and permeability to gases. All these factors render PDMS an appropriate material implementing MSL with pneumatic fluid control for various biological engineering applications [74, 75].
The PDMS valve technology can also create other fundamental microfluidic components, such as peristaltic pumps and mixers. The pumping motion can be obtained by arranging an array of valves in series and actuating them in a peristaltic sequence (Figure 3b). Other designs of peristaltic micropumps have also been reported [78, 79]. For instance, a pneumatic micropump with a serpentine-shape layout is capable of providing a broad pumping rate range from 0 to 539 μlh-1. Besides pumping, mixing can also be accomplished by building a peristaltic pumping system with a channel of rotary geometry (Figure 3c). After two different reagents are injected into the rotary channel from the inlet and outlet valves respectively, both valves are closed and the peristaltic pump is activated. As the fluid flow inside the microchannel follows a hyperbolic velocity profile, the peristaltic pump driven motion leads to an increase in the interfacial area between the reagents and enhances the mixing. The rotary mixer has been utilized to perform reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and it has been demonstrated that the efficiency of gene expression analysis can be enhanced by 70% when compared to the diffusion limited case . Beside the pneumatic control fluidic networks, other activation strategies for the multilayer soft lithography microfluidic systems can also be applied. For example, networks of fluidic gates controlled with a constant flow of Newtonian fluids in a three-layer PDMS structure have been demonstrated .
Integrated microfluidic systems fabricated by MSL have demonstrated the capability to automate complex biological assay procedures and have been applied in various biomedical applications. Digital PCR for detecting copy number variations is one of the promising applications of the MSL microfluidic platform . Accurate quantification of copy number variations for the human genome is essential for studying the association of such variations with human disorders . However, conventional technologies, such as high density single nucleotide polymorphism microarrays and quantitative PCR, can at best distinguish a twofold difference in copy number variations. Digital PCR using a digital array can identify and quantify individual DNA molecules based on the principle of partitioning and it can differentiate as little as 15% differences in gene copy number . Another application of the MSL microfluidic platform is high throughput gene expression analysis and over two thousand real-time PCR gene expression measurements in a single chip have been demonstrated . The MSL microfluidic system is also capable of quantitative measurements with single-cell resolution . Other applications of MSL microfluidics include a fully automated cell culture system, which can create culture media formulations in 96 independent culture chambers and maintain cell viability for weeks [88, 89]. Furthermore, immunoassay based on MSL microfluidics has permitted multiplexed protein measurements using nanoliter-scale samples .
Strength and weakness of the platform
MSL microfluidics using PDMS is a low-cost, robust, and easily configurable technology. A large number of microfluidic components, such as mixers, pumps and valves, can be integrated in a single chip allowing automation of complex biological analysis procedures. The high-throughput capacity of MSL microfluidics enables effective genetic analyses that are otherwise labor intensive and cost restrictive. Also, as the pneumatic valves are miniature, a single fluidic circuit can accommodate thousands of reaction chambers. Additional capacity can be achieved simply by including additional fluidic circuits, which makes the platform modular and applicable to various biological applications. Although MSL related applications, such as high-throughput sequencing technologies, provide a broad impact on the biomedical research and show many potential applications in clinical diagnostics, most of current MSL microfluidic systems are designed for laboratory scale research and require additional supporting equipment for the operation of the device. The current technology is difficult to be implemented as a portable bioanalytical device for field applications . To implement the pneumatic controlled microfluidic network at the point of care necessary items such as external pressure sources, multiplexed gas valves, and detection modules are required to be integrated into the final system, which could present a technological hurdle for system integration [78, 92].
Multiphase microfluidics is a promising microfluidic technology with precise control of the fluid in the form of droplets. The essence of this technology is to generate a large number of droplets with uniform size and shape as independent bioreactors that can be transported, mixed, split, recombined and analyzed . By performing the desired biochemical reactions in droplets, not only can the amount of reagents be reduced down to femtoliter volumes, but also the high surface-to-volume ratio of droplets can enhance the mass and heat transfer, which in turn accelerates the reaction. Furthermore, multiphase microfluidics is a unique technique that is capable of performing a large number of parallel experiments without significantly increasing the scale and complexity of the system.
Emulsions of aqueous droplets in oil have been used widely as microreactors for various biomedical applications as most of the biological reagents involved are in aqueous form. A number of approaches have been developed for merging different reagents into a common droplet for reaction confinement. For example, with alternating microdroplet generation followed by droplet fusion, the synthesis of semiconductor nanoparticles has been realized . Recently, bacteria identification and detection of their susceptibility to antibiotics , single cell genetic analysis , and PCR for targeted sequencing [110, 111] have been demonstrated by taking advantage of the ability to generate a large amount of droplet microreactors. Additional electrical components have also been integrated with the pressure driven platform for more versatile applications [110, 111]. For example, dielectrophoresis has been employed for sorting different types of cells at rates up to 2000 droplets per second [112, 113].
Strength and weakness of the platform
The major advantages of multiphase microfluidics include the abilities to rapidly create a large number of reaction chambers and to precisely control the chemical reactions. These properties are particularly useful for high throughput analyses, such as single cell and single molecule studies. Since biochemical reactions are generally carried out in emulsions of aqueous droplets in oil, the droplets can isolate the reagents for avoiding cross contamination, evaporation of solvents, and unnecessary adsorption on the channel surface. In addition, the device involves no moving micromechanical structures. Therefore, the fabrication process for multiphase microfluidics is relatively simple and cost-effective. For applications that require precise manipulation of the droplets, controls over the surface properties of the channel are necessary because the wetting property of the fluid with respect to the channel wall is important in determining the droplet generation. Furthermore, the microfluidic operation of multiphase microfluidics is typically defined by the channel design and the device is not reconfigurable for other applications. Similar to other pressure driven microfluidic systems, the multiphase microfluidic platform requires supporting equipment, such as syringe pumps and control valves, and is difficult to implement at the point of care.
Another droplet based microfluidic strategy is electrowetting-on-dielectric (EWOD) . While droplet manipulations are involved, EWOD and multiphase microfluidics have different actuation mechanisms. In EWOD based microfluidics, droplet manipulation is achieved by electrowetting on an electrode array and does not require bulky equipment, such as a syringe pump. Various microfluidic operations, such as droplet creation, mixing, merging and splitting, can be performed by programming the applied voltage in the electrode array. Compared to other techniques, the EWOD driven droplet microfluidics platform is highly reconfigurable and requires only electronic interfaces to support its operation. These characteristics are ideal for bioanalytical processes that require complicated procedures and point-of-care diagnostics.
Other droplet-based operations, such as merging and mixing, can also be performed by programming the electric actuation signal [117, 122]. For example, when two droplets are in close contact with a pair of electrodes, an applied potential of AC or pulsed DC will result in droplet coalescence within 100 μs [123, 124] (Figure 5c). Mixing is a crucial step following droplet merging. The basic mechanism of mixing is the oscillation of a droplet between two electrodes so that advection inside the droplet is enhanced [125, 126]. However, flow reversibility has been observed with a linear array of electrodes which limits the mixing efficiency. This can be improved by moving the droplet along an irreversible pattern that breaks the symmetry of the two inner circulating flows  (Figure 5d). Also, capacitance measurements have been used to determine the state of droplet mixing . Accompanied with other electrokinetic forces, additional fluidic operations including separation and concentration can also be achieved [129, 130]. Separation can be implemented by incorporating electrophoresis or dielectrophoresis within a droplet in which two different types of particles can be isolated into two regions inside a mother droplet followed by splitting the droplet. Concentration can be achieved using a similar procedure for droplets containing only one type of particle. On the other hand, optoelectrowetting on open, featureless, and photoconductive surfaces has also been reported for droplet manipulation [131–134]. This approach uses reconfigurable, low intensity optical patterns from a LCD display or a portable cellular phone to control droplet operations including transport, splitting, merging, and mixing.
The EWOD driven microfluidic platform has been applied in various biological engineering applications. For instance, mass spectrometry, which is an important technique for proteomics, requires tedious processing steps including reduction, alkylation, and enzymatic digestion. The lack of a standard sample handling and processing platform has become one of the foremost limitations and EWOD is a powerful tool for performing automated proteomic sample processing [135, 136]. On the other hand, the EWOD platform can not only perform complete mammalian cell culture , but also allowe cell isolation and single cell analysis . Other application of EWOD includes multiplexed real-time PCR which has exhibited a high amplification efficiency .
Strength and weakness of the platform
The EWOD driven microfluidic platform requires relatively simple microfabrication procedures as it involves no moveable mechanical parts in the device. Furthermore, bulky instruments are not required for EWOD operations. Microfluidic operations, such as mixing, merging, sorting, and separation, can be performed on the same set of electrodes by proper programming of the actuation signal. These render EWOD a promising platform for performing complicated bioanalytical procedures and potentially biomedical analyses in resource limited settings. However, addressing a large array of microelectrodes independently is required for high-throughput applications. To this end, multilayer printed circuit boards which allow isolation of electrical wires in different layers can be applied to control a large number of electrodes individually . Another promising solution is optoelectrowetting, which provides a highly flexible interface for creating reconfigurable light-induced electrodes for fluid manipulation. Since EWOD microfluidics involves direct contact between the droplet and the hydrophobic surface, issues to be considered are droplet (reagent and sample) storage, cross-contamination and loss of sample due to the non-specific adsorption of proteins and other reagents on the dielectric surface. To minimize protein absorption, a low concentration of pluronic additives can be applied in the solution to facilitate fluid actuation with high concentration of proteins . Alternatively, a replaceable, polymeric "skin" strategy has been reported for eliminating cross-contamination and facilitating the "world-to-chip" interface by reagent preloading in the skin .
Electrokinetics is a promising microfluidic technology for biological engineering due to its effectiveness on small scales, label-free manipulation, and well-established techniques for fabricating microelectrodes . DC electrokinetic techniques, such as electrophoresis and electroosmosis, have been intensively studied for protein and nucleic acid analyses since the early stage of microfluidic development. AC electrokinetics including dielectrophoresis, electrothermal flow, and AC electroosmosis has also gained significant interests in the past decade and is emerging as a powerful microfluidic strategy [144, 145]. Similar to the EWOD platform, only electronic interfaces are required for electrokinetic manipulation. This is beneficial for developing point-of-care diagnostic systems taking advantage of the recent advancement of portable electronics. Furthermore, multiple electrokinetic phenomena can be combined to perform various microfluidic operations such as mixing, concentration and separation on a single device with low applied AC potential (< 10 Vpp) . These characteristics make electrokinetics a potential technology for developing fully integrated lab-on-a-chip systems.
Under AC electric fields, two types of electrohydrodynamic flow, AC electroosmosis and AC electrothermal flow, can be observed on the microscale . In particular, AC electroosmotic flow is the result of interaction between the applied electric field and the electric double layer induced by electrode polarization (Figure 6c). Since the amount of charges induced by the electric field at the interface of the electrode and electrolyte is dependent on the applied frequency, AC electroosmotic flow is also frequency sensitive. At the low frequencies (<100 Hz), since the electric field in the bulk electrolyte is negligible small, AC electroosmotic effect becomes insignificant. At high frequencies (>100 kHz), AC electroosmotic effect is also insignificant because the time is not sufficient for the formation of the electrical double layer. Therefore, AC electroosmosis is effective at intermediate frequencies (e.g., 100 Hz-100 kHz) and for media with relatively low conductivity (< 100 mS/m) . On the other hand, AC electrothermal flow is the result of Joule heating and is effective at high frequencies (e.g., > 100 kHz) . In AC electrothermal flow, the electric field causes power dissipation in the fluid and gives rise to a temperature gradient (Figure 6d). This results in conductivity and permittivity gradients. The electric field acts on these gradients to create a net body force on the fluid. The fluid velocity is proportional to the temperature rise in the fluid, which is in turn proportional to the fluid conductivity. Therefore, electrothermal flow is especially effective in high conductivity buffers. Most of the clinical and physiological fluids have relatively high conductivities , which highlights the importance of electrothermal flow in biomedical applications. Another AC electrokinetic effect is dielectrophoresis, which is an electrokinetic force exerted on dielectric particles  (Figure 6e). When a dielectric particle is under the influence of an electric field, a dipole moment is induced inside the particle. The dipole then experiences a net force under an electric field gradient with either a spatially varying magnitude or phase. The magnitude and direction of the force depends strongly on the shape and size of the particle, frequency of the electric field and the electrical properties of both the fluid and the particle.
Capillary electrophoresis is one of the first DC electrokinetics driven microfluidic platforms. The system typically consists of an electroosmotic pumping system for sample loading and an electrophoretic separation channel for sample analysis [154, 155]. This technique can separate charged species based on their size-to-charge ratio. Since the velocity profile in electroosmotic flow is uniform, electrokinetic driven systems can minimize the band broadening as in pressure driven systems. Since the joule heating effect is undesirable for capillary electrophoresis, the separation efficiency of DNA samples has been enhanced when electrophoresis and electroosmotic effects are induced by pulsed DC electric fields, compared to those induced by continuous DC electric fields of the same intensity . Microfluidic platforms for sizing, quantification and quality control of DNA, RNA, proteins and cells on a single platform equipped with flow cytometry and electrophoresis analysis has been demonstrated and commercialized . Other electrokinetic platforms combined with the pressure driven flow system and LED detector for various biochemical applications are also available [158, 159]. For instance, a CMOS microarray exploits DC electrophoresis for manipulating molecules and cells has also been demonstrated [160, 161]. In this system, the chip contains as many as 400 individually addressable test sites and the electrode is covered with a thin hydrogel permeation layer to prevent water electrolysis and enhanced surface binding. Furthermore, cell analyses including lysis, separation, and detection operated on a DC electrokinetics driven microfluidic platform has been reported [162, 163].
Strength and weakness of the platform
In terms of system integration, electrokinetic platforms require only simple microfabrication techniques and various electrokinetic sample preparation modules can be integrated easily on the same chip. While DC electroosmotic flow is attractive for chromatographic separation and analysis, DC electrokinetic platform requires high voltage operation, which could be challenging to implement in a hand-held device or in resource limited settings. On the other hand, AC electrokinetics can be carried out at lower voltage, which makes it a more feasible technique for point-of-care diagnostics. Furthermore, multiple electrokinetic phenomena can be combined to perform various fluidic operations on a single device by adjusting the operating parameters, e.g., frequency and the amplitude of the applied voltage. This renders its broad applicability for a variety of medical diagnostic applications. However, electrokinetics can be limited by electrochemical effects including electrolysis, electrode erosion and sample deterioration. Although electrode erosion can be lessened by coating the electrode array, the electrothermal effect could not be ignored. Strong electrothermal effect may result in damages of the protective layer, sample degradation and evaporation . The electrochemical effect should be considered when designing electrokinetic driven microfluidic systems. Finally, as electrokinetic effects are sensitive to the conductivity of sample fluid, the properties of the sample can affect the operational performance of the platform. In situ characterization of the sample conductivity using impedance spectroscopy or other techniques should be integrated into the microfluidic system for handling samples with unknown conductivities.
The centrifugal microfluidic platform, or Lab-on-a-CD, is another promising system integration technology. Lab-on-a-CD system has been a focus of intense research for years due to the simplicity of the instrumentation interface and capabilities of implementing a wide range of fluidic processing steps, such as pumping, mixing, valving, metering, and routing without the requirement of bulky instruments. These functions allow complete automation for various biochemical analyses. A review on centrifugal microfluidics for biomedical applications has been published recently .
Valving in centrifugal microfluidics can be constructed as passive valve or active value on the disc. The most widely used design is the capillary valve, which is a sudden expansion of the microfluidic channel  (Figure 8b). Liquid flow stops when the centrifugal pressure is equal to or less than the capillary barrier pressure. The valve will open when the rotational frequency exceeds the critical burst frequency, which depends on the surface tension and geometric parameters of the channel. The second type of valve is the hydrophobic valve. The fluid flow can be impeded when part of the channel is functionalized with hydrophobic material or when there is a sudden constriction in the hydrophobic channel (Figure 8c). The third method is based on the siphon structure (Figure 8d). When the rotational speed is high, two liquid-gas interfaces are at the same level because of the centrifugal force (valve closes) . Below the critical frequency, the meniscus front on the right passes beyond the bend and fills the channel (valve opens). The siphon valve provides valving at higher spin speeds while the capillary operates at lower spin speeds. There are two drawbacks related to the passive valves discussed above. Firstly, they are not vapor-tight, which could potentially cause cross-contamination among reagents if they have high vapor pressure or high temperature process is involved for the reagents. Secondly, the rotational motion must be adjusted from slow to fast, not vice versa. Alternatively, an active valve has recently been reported which is based on an irreversible and one-time use process . The valve is composed of iron oxide nanoparticles dispersed in paraffin wax. When a laser bean excites the valves, the nanoparticles are able to couple with the laser energy for melting the wax. The valve can be designed in both normally open and close states. In the normally open valve, the chamber preloaded with ferrowax is built adjacent to the main channel. Molten wax, irradiated by laser, bursts into the main channel and solidifies, which in turn blocks the channel. In a normally closed valve, the ferrowax plug is located between two chambers and blocks the fluid flow. After applying the laser power, molten wax flows to the chamber and solidifies, which results in the opening of the channel. This active valve is independent of the spin speed. Aliquoting of liquids has also been reported based on the valving principle . The device for aliquoting consists of an upstream metering channel and a downstream unvented reaction chamber separated by a narrow connection channel. Fluid entering the metering channel seals the reaction chamber. When the rotational speed is increased above the critical burst frequency, the fluid fills the reaction chamber. The metering volumes are set by the capacity of the reaction chamber.
One of the techniques for mixing in centrifugal microfluidics, the shake-mode mixing, involves rapid oscillation of the disc between clockwise and counter clockwise directions . The inertia of the liquid induces a gradient of angular momentum to promote mixing. This strategy can reduce the mixing times from 7 minutes with mere diffusion to several seconds with the shake-mode mixing. Other mixer designs have also been demonstrated based on this principle. For instance, unidirectional shake-mode mixing has been developed for minimizing the valving problems with buffers of high detergent or salt concentrations . In this approach, the disc was accelerated and decelerated sequentially while the spinning direction stayed the same . This technique is capable of mixing 30 μl of fluid in less than 3 min.
A wide range of applications have been realized using the centrifugal microfluidic platform. For example, the versatile platform allows extraction of plasma from whole blood  and nucleic acid from clinical samples, such as nasopharyngeal aspirates . Dielectrophoresis assisted selective filtering with 3D carbon electrodes fabricated in a centrifugal platform has also been reported . Using this system, a mixture of latex particles and yeast cells can be isolated by trapping the yeast cells at flow rates up to 35 μl/min. Fully automated nucleic acid analysis systems based on real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR)  or isothermal recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA)  is another successful application of centrifugal microfluidics. A limit of detection below 10 copies of DNA has been achieved using the system. Other applications include infectious agent detection from blood with enzyme-linked immuno-sorbent assay (ELISA)  (Figure 8e), on-site pre-concentration and screening of organic contaminants in aqueous samples , and extraction of pathogen specific DNA from the whole blood.
Various biological assays can be incorporated in the centrifugal microfluidic platform . Examples of assay formats include sandwich immunoassay for antigen quantification, indirect antibody immunoassay and bridging immunoassay for antibody quantification. To perform the assay, streptavidin-coated microparticles can be first pre-packed into the system. The binding of the target molecules (antigens or antibodies) proceeds after the mixing the microparticles with the biotin-labeled capture reagent. A laser induced fluorescent (LIF) detector integrated with the workstation can detect the analyte with the fluorophore-labeled complex. Multiple immunoassays have been carried out at the nanoliter scale and 112 column scans can be accomplished in only 1.5 mins. Immunoassays including biomarkers detection such as cytokines, pharmacokinetics (PK)/toxicokinetics (TK) assays and anti-drug antibody (ADA) assays have been demonstrated with the technique. Another CD based platform, Piccolo Xpress, is capable of processing whole blood samples with only 0.1 cc sample size and the results are available in 12 minutes .
Strength and weakness of the platform
There are several advantages of the centrifugal microfluidic platform. Firstly, it requires only a simple and compact motor to create rotational motion for fluid manipulation. The microfluidic elements imprinted on the single disc can perform all basic microfluidic operations required for a fully automated system. Multiplexed analyses can be achieved due to the rotational symmetry of the disks. Additionally, the fabrication of the centrifugal microfluidic system is cost-effective since large scales of plastics cartridges can be made at low-cost. However, due to the rotational motion, contact free interface is required for other additional modules such as optical detection and actuation. Another consideration is that as the whole disc is rotated at the same frequency, processes with different critical frequencies are difficult to be implemented simultaneously. Lastly, once all the elements are imprinted on the cartridge permanently, the platform offers little reconfigurability seeing that the re-design of new channels are needed for each assay.
For applications with complicated tasks, such as concentration, mixing and separation, hybrid microfluidics, which is the incorporation of different microfluidic strategies into a single platform, can be a solution for maintaining the portability and simplicity of the system. For example, electrokinetic technologies such as dielectrophoresis and electrophoresis have been integrated into the EWOD platform for particle concentration and separation within the droplets [129, 130]. Another example involves the fabrication of 3D carbon electrodes in a centrifugal platform for trapping particles of interest . Electrokinetic approaches have also been widely adopted in the multiphase microfluidics platform for droplet fusion and sorting [110–112]. Another hybrid microfluidics configuration, which is the integration of EWOD with microchannels on a single platform, has also been demonstrated for in-line sample processing and separations . The hybrid microfluidics approach will be a prospective strategy for obtaining a more flexible and cost-efficient chip design as it can take advantage of the full potential of the microfluidics platform and at the same time alleviate its limitations with other microfluidics technologies.
Beside the fluidic components for performing basic fluidic operations, the detection module for converting biochemical responses into quantifiable signals is another crucial element in a lab-on-a-chip system. Most of the biomedical applications require sensitive detection modules, such as microscopes for cell, bacteria, and fluorescence visualization, thermal cyclers for PCR reactions, and mass spectrometers for sample analyses. This is one of the major reasons of why many commercially available lab-on-a-chip systems are limited to bench-top rather than handheld instruments. Therefore, there is a growing interest for the microfluidics community to investigate portable detection modules. By now, the two most prevalent types of sensing modules with the microfluidic systems are based on optical and electrical signals. For optical detection, the most commercially successful module for system integration is certainly the lateral flow tests in which the readout of an assay is mostly implemented with manual observation of the color change in the detection zone. However, manual observation is only applicable to applications with high analyte concentrations. For most biochemical applications, advanced detection strategies, such as bright field and dark field imaging, confocal microscopy, laser induced fluorescence microscopy and surface plasmon resonance microscopy, are required due to their high sensitivity, resolution, and signal-to-noise ratio [199–203]. To avoid bulky optics, the development of simple, miniaturized, and low-cost optical systems is a major research area recently [204–209]. For example, lensfree digital microscopy has been demonstrated with compact, light-weight and cost effective optical components mechanically attached to a camera unit of a cell phone . Images of micro-sized objects such as red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets can be captured with the system. This approach will also be useful in promoting global health delivery through telecommunication. For electrical detection modules, electrochemistry is a promising candidate for lab-on-a-chip devices. Not only because of its high sensitivity, but also the electrical signal can be processed by conventional electronics and the miniaturization and integration of the electrochemical transducer into a microfluidic device is feasible . As of now, the adaptation of electrochemistry as the sensing modules has been realized for detecting various types of pathogens and biomolecules, such as glucose, lactate, uric acid , anti-DNA antibodies , and uropathogens.
Over the past ten years, although academic and industrial researchers have put a lot of effort on developing different microfluidic devices, it still has not gained widespread market adoption by the general public or even by the research community . Interestingly, the development of a successful technology is often driven by only one or two important applications (i.e., an killer app), especially for those technologies requiring large capital investments . For instance, MEMS accelerometer is primarily driven by the automobile industry while it is currently adopted in various consumer electronics, such as digital camera and video game systems, and defense applications. From this view point, the field of microfluidics is in search for an important application to drive the commercialization of the field. It will likely be an application that has a large demand and can justify the cost of a microfluidic diagnostic device. These characteristics are required to justify the risk and large scale investment associated with commercializing a microfluidic system. Potential candidates include detection systems for infectious diseases (e.g., urinary tract infection, human immunodeficiency virus, diarrheal diseases, and tuberculosis), cardiac markers for risky heart attack patients, early stage cancer diagnostics, and bio/chemical warfare agents for security applications.
Numerous ongoing research works are working on building novel microfluidic platforms through the development of novel system integration strategies. Further development in this area will lead to fully automated microfactories that allow various biochemical analyses to be performed at low cost for a wide spectrum of biological and biomedical engineering applications [114, 215–218].
This work is supported by NIH Director's New Innovator Award (1DP2OD007161-01), NIH NIAID (1U01AI082457-01; R43AI088756-01), NIH NICHD (R43HD065303-01), and NSF (0930900; 0900899).
- Whitesides GM: The origins and the future of microfluidics. Nature 2006, 442: 368-373. 10.1038/nature05058Google Scholar
- Chen CH, Lu Y, Sin MLY, Mach KE, Zhang DD, Gau V, Liao JC, Wong PK: Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Using High Surface-to-Volume Ratio Microchannels. Analytical Chemistry 2010, 82: 1012-1019. 10.1021/ac9022764Google Scholar
- Squires TM, Quake SR: Microfluidics: Fluid physics at the nanoliter scale. Rev Mod Phys 2005, 77: 977-1026. 10.1103/RevModPhys.77.977Google Scholar
- Lam MHC, Homenuke MA, Michal CA, Hansen CL: Sub-nanoliter nuclear magnetic resonance coils fabricated with multilayer soft lithography. J Micromech Microeng 2009, 19: 095001. 10.1088/0960-1317/19/9/095001Google Scholar
- Chung AJ, Kim D, Erickson D: Electrokinetic microfluidic devices for rapid, low power drug delivery in autonomous microsystems. Lab on a Chip 2008, 8: 330-338. 10.1039/b713325aGoogle Scholar
- Sista R, Hua ZS, Thwar P, Sudarsan A, Srinivasan V, Eckhardt A, Pollack M, Pamula V: Development of a digital microfluidic platform for point of care testing. Lab on a Chip 2008, 8: 2091-2104. 10.1039/b814922dGoogle Scholar
- Hettiarachchi K, Talu E, Longo ML, Dayton PA, Lee AP: On-chip generation of microbubbles as a practical technology for manufacturing contrast agents for ultrasonic imaging. Lab on a Chip 2007, 7: 463-468. 10.1039/b701481nGoogle Scholar
- Rohde CB, Zeng F, Gonzalez-Rubio R, Angel M, Yanik MF: Microfluidic system for on-chip high-throughput whole-animal sorting and screening at subcellular resolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2007, 104: 13891-13895. 10.1073/pnas.0706513104Google Scholar
- Riegger L, Grumann M, Steigert J, Lutz S, Steinert CP, Mueller C, Viertel J, Prucker O, Ruhe J, Zengerle R, Ducree J: Single-step centrifugal hematocrit determination on a 10-$ processing device. Biomedical Microdevices 2007, 9: 795-799. 10.1007/s10544-007-9091-1Google Scholar
- Chikkaveeraiah BV, Liu HY, Mani V, Papadimitrakopoulos F, Rusling JF: A microfluidic electrochemical device for high sensitivity biosensing: Detection of nanomolar hydrogen peroxide. Electrochemistry Communications 2009, 11: 819-822. 10.1016/j.elecom.2009.02.002Google Scholar
- Lee W, Fon W, Axelrod BW, Roukes ML: High-sensitivity microfluidic calorimeters for biological and chemical applications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2009, 106: 15225-15230. 10.1073/pnas.0901447106Google Scholar
- Blanco-Gomez G, Glidle A, Flendrig LM, Cooper JM: Integration of Low-Power Microfluidic Pumps with Biosensors within a Laboratory-on-a-Chip Device. Analytical Chemistry 2009, 81: 1365-1370. 10.1021/ac802006dGoogle Scholar
- Chang ST, Beaumont E, Petsev DN, Velev OD: Remotely powered distributed microfluidic pumps and mixers based on miniature diodes. Lab on a Chip 2008, 8: 117-124. 10.1039/b712108cGoogle Scholar
- Mair DA, Schwei TR, Dinio TS, Svec F, Frechet JMJ: Use of photopatterned porous polymer monoliths as passive micromixers to enhance mixing efficiency for on-chip labeling reactions. Lab on a Chip 2009, 9: 877-883. 10.1039/b816521aGoogle Scholar
- Rosenfeld C, Serra C, Brochon C, Hadziioannou G: Influence of micromixer characteristics on polydispersity index of block copolymers synthesized in continuous flow microreactors. Lab on a Chip 2008, 8: 1682-1687. 10.1039/b803885fGoogle Scholar
- Zhang CS, Xing D, Li YY: Micropumps, microvalves, and micromixers within PCR microfluidic chips: Advances and trends. Biotechnol Adv 2007, 25: 483-514. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.05.003Google Scholar
- Gao J, Sin MLY, Liu T, Gau V, Liao JC, Wong PK: Hybrid Electrokinetic Manipulation in High-Conductivity Media. Lab Chip 2011, 11: 1770-1775. 10.1039/c1lc20054bGoogle Scholar
- Churski K, Michalski J, Garstecki P: Droplet on demand system utilizing a computer controlled microvalve integrated into a stiff polymeric microfluidic device. Lab on a Chip 2010, 10: 512-518. 10.1039/b915155aGoogle Scholar
- Kaigala GV, Hoang VN, Backhouse CJ: Electrically controlled microvalves to integrate microchip polymerase chain reaction and capillary electrophoresis. Lab on a Chip 2008, 8: 1071-1078. 10.1039/b802853bGoogle Scholar
- Kim JT, Chen DF, Bau HH: An automated, pre-programmed, multiplexed, hydraulic microvalve. Lab on a Chip 2009, 9: 3594-3598. 10.1039/b914865eGoogle Scholar
- Mark D, Haeberle S, Roth G, von Stetten F, Zengerle R: Microfluidic lab-on-a-chip platforms: requirements, characteristics and applications. Chemical Society Reviews 2010, 39: 1153-1182. 10.1039/b820557bGoogle Scholar
- Mariella R: Sample preparation: the weak link in microfluidics-based biodetection. Biomedical Microdevices 2008, 10: 777-784. 10.1007/s10544-008-9190-7Google Scholar
- Kim DH, Wong PK, Park J, Levchenko A, Sun Y: Microengineered Platforms for Cell Mechanobiology. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 2009, 11: 203-233. 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-061008-124915Google Scholar
- Kim J, Junkin M, Kim DH, Kwon S, Shin YS, Wong PK, Gale BK: Applications, techniques, and microfluidic interfacing for nanoscale biosensing. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics 2009, 7: 149-167. 10.1007/s10404-009-0431-8Google Scholar
- Wang TH, Peng YH, Zhang CY, Wong PK, Ho CM: Single-molecule tracing on a fluidic microchip for quantitative detection of low-abundance nucleic acids. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2005, 127: 5354-5359. 10.1021/ja042642iGoogle Scholar
- Lawi W, Wiita C, Snyder ST, Wei F, Wong D, Wong PK, Liao JC, Haake D, Gau V: A Microfluidic Cartridge System for Multiplexed Clinical Analysis. Jala-J Assoc Lab Aut 2009, 14: 407-412. 10.1016/j.jala.2009.05.002Google Scholar
- Chiu ML, Lawi W, Snyder ST, Wong PK, Liao JC, Gau V: Matrix Effect - A Challenge Toward Automation of Molecular Analysis. Journal of Association for Laboratory Automation 2010, 15: 233-242. 10.1016/j.jala.2010.02.001Google Scholar
- Choi S, Chae J: A Physisorbed Interface Design of Biomolecules for Selective and Sensitive Protein Detection. Journal of Association for Laboratory Automation 2010, 15: 172-178. 10.1016/j.jala.2009.09.002Google Scholar
- Garcia DE, Chen T-H, Wei F, Ho CM: A Parametric Design Study of an Electrochemical Sensor. Journal of Association for Laboratory Automation 2010, 15: 179-188. 10.1016/j.jala.2010.01.007Google Scholar
- Kwong H-J, Dean ZS, Angus SV, Yoon J-Y: Lab-on-a-Chip for Field Escherichia coli Assays: Long-Term Stability of Reagents and Automatic Sampling System. Journal of Association for Laboratory Automation 2010, 15: 216-226. 10.1016/j.jala.2010.01.011Google Scholar
- Lawi W, Wiita C, Snyder ST, Wei F, Wong D, Wong PK, Liao JC, Haake DA, Gau V: A Microfluidic Cartridge System for Multiplexed Clinical Analysis. Journal of Association for Laboratory Automation 2009, 14: 407-412. 10.1016/j.jala.2009.05.002Google Scholar
- Li N: Detection of Non-Nucleic Acid Targets With an Unmodified Aptamer and a Fluorogenic Competitor. Journal of Association for Laboratory Automation 2010, 15: 189-197. 10.1016/j.jala.2010.02.002Google Scholar
- Lin H-C, Liu Y-J, Yao D-J: Core-Shell Droplets for Parallel DNA Ligation of an Ultra-micro Volume Using an EWOD Microfluidic System. Journal of Association for Laboratory Automation 2010, 15: 210-215. 10.1016/j.jala.2010.01.010Google Scholar
- Mandy LY, Sin VG, Liao Joseph C, Wong Pak: Electrothermal Fluid Manipulation of High-Conductivity Samples for Laboratory Automation Applications. Journal of Association for Laboratory Automation 2010, 15: 426-432. 10.1016/j.jala.2010.05.004Google Scholar
- Ryu K, Chung SK, Cho SK: Micropumping by an Acoustically Excited Oscillating Bubble for Automated Implantable Microfluidic Devices. Journal of Association for Laboratory Automation 2010, 2010: 163-171.Google Scholar
- Sin MLY, Gau V, Liao JC, Wong PK: Electrothermal Fluid Manipulation of High-Conductivity Samples for Laboratory Automation Applications. Journal of Association for Laboratory Automation 2010, 15: 426-432. 10.1016/j.jala.2010.05.004Google Scholar
- Wang TH, Wong PK: Transforming Microfluidics into Laboratory Automation. Journal of Association for Laboratory Automation 2010, 15: A15-A16. 10.1016/j.jala.2010.03.002Google Scholar
- Wang Z, Gidwani V, Sun Z, Zhang DD, Wong PK: Development of a molecular assay for rapid screening of chemopreventive compounds targeting Nrf2. Journal of Association for Laboratory Automation 2008, 13: 243-248. 10.1016/j.jala.2008.03.007Google Scholar
- Yang W, T WA: Integrated Multiprocess Microfluidic Systems for Automating Analysis. Journal of Association for Laboratory Automation 2010, 15: 198-209. 10.1016/j.jala.2010.01.008Google Scholar
- Chin CD, Linder V, Sia SK: Lab-on-a-chip devices for global health: Past studies and future opportunities. Lab on a Chip 2007, 7: 41-57. 10.1039/b611455eGoogle Scholar
- Yager P, Edwards T, Fu E, Helton K, Nelson K, Tam MR, Weigl BH: Microfluidic diagnostic technologies for global public health. Nature 2006, 442: 412-418. 10.1038/nature05064Google Scholar
- Yager P, Domingo GJ, Gerdes J: Point-of-care diagnostics for global health. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 2008, 10: 107-144. 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.10.061807.160524Google Scholar
- Mach KE, Wong PK, Liao JC: Biosensor Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection: A Path to Better Treatment? Trends in Pharmacological Sciences (accepted)Google Scholar
- Lee WG, Kim YG, Chung BG, Demirci U, Khademhosseini A: Nano/Microfluidics for diagnosis of infectious diseases in developing countries. Adv Drug Deliver Rev 2010, 62: 449-457. 10.1016/j.addr.2009.11.016Google Scholar
- Kim J, Junkin M, Kim DH, Kwon S, Shin YS, Wong PK, Gale BK: Applications, Techniques, and Microfluidic Interfacing for Nanoscale Biosensing. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics 2009, 7: 149-167. 10.1007/s10404-009-0431-8Google Scholar
- Whitesides G: Solving problems. Lab on a Chip 2010, 10: 2317-2318.Google Scholar
- Haeberle S, Zengerle R: Microfluidic platforms for lab-on-a-chip applications. Lab on a Chip 2007, 7: 1094-1110. 10.1039/b706364bGoogle Scholar
- Lateral Flow Immunoassay. United States: Springer; 2009.Google Scholar
- Schwartmann B, Enbergs H: Results and Practical Experiences with an Early-Pregnancy Diagnosis for Mares Using a Rapid Radioimmunoassay for Progesterone Detection in Blood. Zuchthygiene-Reproduction in Domestic Animals 1980, 15: 75-75.Google Scholar
- Martinez AW, Phillips ST, Wiley BJ, Gupta M, Whitesides GM: FLASH: A rapid method for prototyping paper-based microfluidic devices. Lab on a Chip 2008, 8: 2146-2150. 10.1039/b811135aGoogle Scholar
- Posthuma-Trumpie GA, Korf J, van Amerongen A: Lateral flow (immuno) assay: its strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. A literature survey. Anal Bioanal Chem 2009, 393: 569-582. 10.1007/s00216-008-2287-2Google Scholar
- Shimojo N, Naka K, Nakajima C, Yoshikawa C, Okuda K, Okada K: Test-Strip Method for Measuring Lactate in Whole-Blood. Clinical Chemistry 1989, 35: 1992-1994.Google Scholar
- Zimmermann M, Hunziker P, Delamarche E: Autonomous capillary system for one-step immunoassays. Biomedical Microdevices 2009, 11: 1-8. 10.1007/s10544-008-9187-2Google Scholar
- Gervais L, Delamarche E: Toward one-step point-of-care immunodiagnostics using capillary-driven microfluidics and PDMS substrates. Lab on a Chip 2009, 9: 3330-3337. 10.1039/b906523gGoogle Scholar
- Collison ME, Stout PJ, Glushko TS, Pokela KN, Mullins-Hirte DJ, Racchini JR, Walter MA, Mecca SP, Rundquist J, Allen JJ, Hilgers ME, Hoegh TB: Analytical characterization of electrochemical biosensor test strips for measurement of glucose in low-volume interstitial fluid samples. Clinical Chemistry 1999, 45: 1665-1673.Google Scholar
- Martinez AW, Phillips ST, Whitesides GM, Carrilho E: Diagnostics for the Developing World: Microfluidic Paper-Based Analytical Devices. Analytical Chemistry 2010, 82: 3-10. 10.1021/ac9013989Google Scholar
- Li X, Tian JF, Shen W: Progress in patterned paper sizing for fabrication of paper-based microfluidic sensors. Cellulose 2010, 17: 649-659. 10.1007/s10570-010-9401-2Google Scholar
- Li X, Tian JF, Nguyen T, Shen W: Paper-Based Microfluidic Devices by Plasma Treatment. Analytical Chemistry 2008, 80: 9131-9134. 10.1021/ac801729tGoogle Scholar
- Lu Y, Shi WW, Qin JH, Lin BC: Fabrication and Characterization of Paper-Based Microfluidics Prepared in Nitrocellulose Membrane By Wax Printing. Analytical Chemistry 2010, 82: 329-335. 10.1021/ac9020193Google Scholar
- Carrilho E, Phillips ST, Vella SJ, Martinez AW, Whitesides GM: Paper Microzone Plates. Analytical Chemistry 2009, 81: 5990-5998. 10.1021/ac900847gGoogle Scholar
- Martinez AW, Phillips ST, Whitesides GM: Three-dimensional microfluidic devices fabricated in layered paper and tape. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2008, 105: 19606-19611. 10.1073/pnas.0810903105Google Scholar
- Helton KL, Nelson KE, Fu E, Yager P: Conditioning saliva for use in a microfluidic biosensor. Lab on a Chip 2008, 8: 1847-1851. 10.1039/b811150bGoogle Scholar
- Hatch A, Kamholz AE, Hawkins KR, Munson MS, Schilling EA, Weigl BH, Yager P: A rapid diffusion immunoassay in a T-sensor. Nature Biotechnology 2001, 19: 461-465. 10.1038/88135Google Scholar
- Osborn JL, Lutz B, Fu E, Kauffman P, Stevens DY, Yager P: Microfluidics without pumps: reinventing the T-sensor and H-filter in paper networks. Lab on a Chip 2010, 10: 2659-2665. 10.1039/c004821fGoogle Scholar
- Levine RL, Fromm RE, Mojtahedzadeh M, Baghaie AA, Opekun AR: Equivalence of Litmus Paper and Intragastric Ph Probes for Intragastric Ph Monitoring in the Intensive-Care Unit. Critical Care Medicine 1994, 22: 945-948. 10.1097/00003246-199406000-00011Google Scholar
- Huh D, Mills KL, Zhu X, Burns MA, Thouless MD, Takayama S: Tuneable elastomeric nanochannels for nanofluidic manipulation. Nature Mater 2007, 6: 424-428. 10.1038/nmat1907Google Scholar
- Hegg MC, Chia-Jean W, Lin LY, Parviz BA: Nano-scale quantum dot optical transducers by self-assembly. In Lasers and Electro-Optics Society, 2005 LEOS 2005 The 18th Annual Meeting of the IEEE Edited by: Chia-Jean W. 2005, 124-125.Google Scholar
- Ellerbee AK, Phillips ST, Siegel AC, Mirica KA, Martinez AW, Striehl P, Jain N, Prentiss M, Whitesides GM: Quantifying Colorimetric Assays in Paper-Based Microfluidic Devices by Measuring the Transmission of Light through Paper. Analytical Chemistry 2009, 81: 8447-8452. 10.1021/ac901307qGoogle Scholar
- Khan MS, Thouas G, Shen W, Whyte G, Garnier G: Paper Diagnostic for Instantaneous Blood Typing. Analytical Chemistry 2010, 82: 4158-4164. 10.1021/ac100341nGoogle Scholar
- Klasner SA, Price AK, Hoeman KW, Wilson RS, Bell KJ, Culbertson CT: Paper-based microfluidic devices for analysis of clinically relevant analytes present in urine and saliva. Anal Bioanal Chem 2010, 397: 1821-1829. 10.1007/s00216-010-3718-4Google Scholar
- Martinez AW, Phillips ST, Carrilho E, Thomas SW, Sindi H, Whitesides GM: Simple telemedicine for developing regions: Camera phones and paper-based microfluidic devices for real-time, off-site diagnosis. Analytical Chemistry 2008, 80: 3699-3707. 10.1021/ac800112rGoogle Scholar
- Melin J, Quake SR: Microfluidic large-scale integration: The evolution of design rules for biological automation. Annu Rev Bioph Biom 2007, 36: 213-231. 10.1146/annurev.biophys.36.040306.132646Google Scholar
- Unger MA, Chou HP, Thorsen T, Scherer A, Quake SR: Monolithic microfabricated valves and pumps by multilayer soft lithography. Science 2000, 288: 113-116. 10.1126/science.288.5463.113Google Scholar
- Regehr KJ, Domenech M, Koepsel JT, Carver KC, Ellison-Zelski SJ, Murphy WL, Schuler LA, Alarid ET, Beebe DJ: Biological implications of polydimethylsiloxane-based microfluidic cell culture. Lab on a Chip 2009, 9: 2132-2139. 10.1039/b903043cGoogle Scholar
- Pearce TM, Williams JC: Microtechnology: Meet neurobiology. Lab on a Chip 2007, 7: 30-40. 10.1039/b612856bGoogle Scholar
- Oh KW, Ahn CH: A review of microvalves. J Micromech Microeng 2006, 16: R13-R39. 10.1088/0960-1317/16/5/R01Google Scholar
- Grover WH, Ivester RHC, Jensen EC, Mathies RA: Development and multiplexed control of latching pneumatic valves using microfluidic logical structures. Lab on a Chip 2006, 6: 623-631. 10.1039/b518362fGoogle Scholar
- Yang YN, Hsiung SK, Lee GB: A pneumatic micropump incorporated with a normally closed valve capable of generating a high pumping rate and a high back pressure. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics 2009, 6: 823-833. 10.1007/s10404-008-0356-7Google Scholar
- Jeong OC, Konishi S: Fabrication of a peristaltic micro pump with novel cascaded actuators. J Micromech Microeng 2008, 18: 025022. 10.1088/0960-1317/18/2/025022Google Scholar
- Huang SB, Wu MH, Cui ZF, Cui Z, Lee GB: A membrane-based serpentine-shape pneumatic micropump with pumping performance modulated by fluidic resistance. J Micromech Microeng 2008, 18: 045008. 10.1088/0960-1317/18/4/045008Google Scholar
- Bontoux N, Dauphinot L, Vitalis T, Studer V, Chen Y, Rossier J, Potier MC: Integrating whole transcriptome assays on a lab-on-a-chip for single cell gene profiling. Lab on a Chip 2008, 8: 443-450. 10.1039/b716543aGoogle Scholar
- Mosadegh B, Kuo CH, Tung YC, Torisawa YS, Bersano-Begey T, Tavana H, Takayama S: Integrated elastomeric components for autonomous regulation of sequential and oscillatory flow switching in microfluidic devices. Nat Phys 2010, 6: 433-437.Google Scholar
- Bhat S, Herrmann J, Armishaw P, Corbisier P, Emslie KR: Single molecule detection in nanofluidic digital array enables accurate measurement of DNA copy number. Anal Bioanal Chem 2009, 394: 457-467. 10.1007/s00216-009-2729-5Google Scholar
- Kato M, Kawaguchi T, Ishikawa S, Umeda T, Nakamichi R, Shapero MH, Jones KW, Nakamura Y, Aburatani H, Tsunoda T: Population-genetic nature of copy number variations in the human genome. Human Molecular Genetics 2010, 19: 761-773. 10.1093/hmg/ddp541Google Scholar
- Qin J, Jones RC, Ramakrishnan R: Studying copy number variations using a nanofluidic platform. Nucleic Acids Research 2008, 36: e116. 10.1093/nar/gkn518Google Scholar
- Spurgeon SL, Jones RC, Ramakrishnan R: High Throughput Gene Expression Measurement with Real Time PCR in a Microfluidic Dynamic Array. Plos One 2008, 3: e1662. 10.1371/journal.pone.0001662Google Scholar
- Tay S, Hughey JJ, Lee TK, Lipniacki T, Quake SR, Covert MW: Single-cell NF-kappa B dynamics reveal digital activation and analogue information processing. Nature 2010, 466: 267-U149. 10.1038/nature09145Google Scholar
- Gomez-Sjoberg R, Leyrat AA, Pirone DM, Chen CS, Quake SR: Versatile, fully automated, microfluidic cell culture system. Analytical Chemistry 2007, 79: 8557-8563. 10.1021/ac071311wGoogle Scholar
- Balagadde FK, You LC, Hansen CL, Arnold FH, Quake SR: Long-term monitoring of bacteria undergoing programmed population control in a microchemostat. Science 2005, 309: 137-140. 10.1126/science.1109173Google Scholar
- Diercks AH, Ozinsky A, Hansen CL, Spotts JM, Rodriguez DJ, Aderem A: A microfluidic device for multiplexed protein detection in nano-liter volumes. Analytical Biochemistry 2009, 386: 30-35. 10.1016/j.ab.2008.12.012Google Scholar
- Voelkerding KV, Dames S, Durtschi JD: Next Generation Sequencing for Clinical Diagnostics-Principles and Application to Targeted Resequencing for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy A Paper from the 2009 William Beaumont Hospital Symposium on Molecular Pathology. Journal of Molecular Diagnostics 2010, 12: 539-551. 10.2353/jmoldx.2010.100043Google Scholar
- Huang SB, Wu MH, Lee GB: A tunable micro filter modulated by pneumatic pressure for cell separation. Sensors and Actuators B-Chemical 2009, 142: 389-399. 10.1016/j.snb.2009.07.046Google Scholar
- Teh SY, Lin R, Hung LH, Lee AP: Droplet microfluidics. Lab on a Chip 2008, 8: 198-220. 10.1039/b715524gGoogle Scholar
- Griffiths AD, Tawfik DS: Miniaturising the laboratory in emulsion droplets. Trends in Biotechnology 2006, 24: 395-402. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.06.009Google Scholar
- Garstecki P, Fuerstman MJ, Stone HA, Whitesides GM: Formation of droplets and bubbles in a microfluidic T-junction - scaling and mechanism of break-up. Lab on a Chip 2006, 6: 437-446. 10.1039/b510841aGoogle Scholar
- Tan YC, Cristini V, Lee AP: Monodispersed microfluidic droplet generation by shear focusing microfluidic device. Sensors and Actuators B-Chemical 2006, 114: 350-356. 10.1016/j.snb.2005.06.008Google Scholar
- Stan CA, Tang SKY, Whitesides GM: Independent Control of Drop Size and Velocity in Microfluidic Flow-Focusing Generators Using Variable Temperature and Flow Rate. Analytical Chemistry 2009, 81: 2399-2402. 10.1021/ac8026542Google Scholar
- Nie ZH, Seo MS, Xu SQ, Lewis PC, Mok M, Kumacheva E, Whitesides GM, Garstecki P, Stone HA: Emulsification in a microfluidic flow-focusing device: effect of the viscosities of the liquids. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics 2008, 5: 585-594.Google Scholar
- Hung LH, Choi KM, Tseng WY, Tan YC, Shea KJ, Lee AP: Alternating droplet generation and controlled dynamic droplet fusion in microfluidic device for CdS nanoparticle synthesis. Lab on a Chip 2006, 6: 174-178. 10.1039/b513908bGoogle Scholar
- Seo M, Paquet C, Nie ZH, Xu SQ, Kumacheva E: Microfluidic consecutive flow-focusing droplet generators. Soft Matter 2007, 3: 986-992. 10.1039/b700687jGoogle Scholar
- Liu K, Ding HJ, Chen Y, Zhao XZ: Droplet-based synthetic method using microflow focusing and droplet fusion. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics 2007, 3: 239-243. 10.1007/s10404-006-0121-8Google Scholar
- Adamson DN, Mustafi D, Zhang JXJ, Zheng B, Ismagilov RF: Production of arrays of chemically distinct nanolitre plugs via repeated splitting in microfluidic devices. Lab on a Chip 2006, 6: 1178-1186. 10.1039/b604993aGoogle Scholar
- Menetrier-Deremble L, Tabeling P: Droplet breakup in microfluidic junctions of arbitrary angles. Physical Review E 2006, 74: 035303.Google Scholar
- Xia HM, Wan SYM, Shu C, Chew YT: Chaotic micromixers using two-layer crossing channels to exhibit fast mixing at low Reynolds numbers. Lab on a Chip 2005, 5: 748-755. 10.1039/b502031jGoogle Scholar
- Cabral JT, Hudson SD: Microfluidic approach for rapid multicomponent interfacial tensiometry. Lab on a Chip 2006, 6: 427-436. 10.1039/b511976fGoogle Scholar
- Frenz L, Blank K, Brouzes E, Griffiths AD: Reliable microfluidic on-chip incubation of droplets in delay-lines. Lab on a Chip 2009, 9: 1344-1348. 10.1039/b816049jGoogle Scholar
- Prakash M, Gershenfeld N: Microfluidic bubble logic. Science 2007, 315: 832-835. 10.1126/science.1136907Google Scholar
- Boedicker JQ, Li L, Kline TR, Ismagilov RF: Detecting bacteria and determining their susceptibility to antibiotics by stochastic confinement in nanoliter droplets using plug-based microfluidics. Lab on a Chip 2008, 8: 1265-1272. 10.1039/b804911dGoogle Scholar
- Zeng Y, Novak R, Shuga J, Smith MT, Mathies RA: High-Performance Single Cell Genetic Analysis Using Microfluidic Emulsion Generator Arrays. Analytical Chemistry 2010, 82: 3183-3190. 10.1021/ac902683tGoogle Scholar
- Mazutis L, Araghi AF, Miller OJ, Baret JC, Frenz L, Janoshazi A, Taly V, Miller BJ, Hutchison JB, Link D, Griffiths AD, Ryckelnck M: Droplet-Based Microfluidic Systems for High-Throughput Single DNA Molecule Isothermal Amplification and Analysis. Analytical Chemistry 2009, 81: 4813-4821. 10.1021/ac900403zGoogle Scholar
- Brouzes E, Medkova M, Savenelli N, Marran D, Twardowski M, Hutchison JB, Rothberg JM, Link DR, Perrimon N, Samuels ML: Droplet microfluidic technology for single-cell high-throughput screening. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2009, 106: 14195-14200. 10.1073/pnas.0903542106Google Scholar
- Baret JC, Miller OJ, Taly V, Ryckelynck M, El-Harrak A, Frenz L, Rick C, Samuels ML, Hutchison JB, Agresti JJ, Link DR, Weitz DA, Griffiths AD: Fluorescence-activated droplet sorting (FADS): efficient microfluidic cell sorting based on enzymatic activity. Lab on a Chip 2009, 9: 1850-1858. 10.1039/b902504aGoogle Scholar
- Amemiya T, Hashimoto K, Fujishima A: Faradaic Charge-Transfer with Double-Layer Charging and or Adsorption-Related Charging at Polymer-Modified Electrodes as Observed by Color Impedance Spectroscopy. Journal of Physical Chemistry 1993, 97: 9736-9740. 10.1021/j100140a033Google Scholar
- Abdelgawad M, Wheeler AR: The Digital Revolution: A New Paradigm for Microfluidics. Advanced Materials 2009, 21: 920-925. 10.1002/adma.200802244Google Scholar
- Wheeler AR: Chemistry - Putting electrowetting to work. Science 2008, 322: 539-540. 10.1126/science.1165719Google Scholar
- Abdelgawad M, Park P, Wheeler AR: Optimization of device geometry in single-plate digital microfluidics. Journal of Applied Physics 2009., 105:Google Scholar
- Cho SK, Moon HJ, Kim CJ: Creating, transporting, cutting, and merging liquid droplets by electrowetting-based actuation for digital microfluidic circuits. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems 2003, 12: 70-80. 10.1109/JMEMS.2002.807467Google Scholar
- Fouillet Y, Jary D, Chabrol C, Claustre P, Peponnet C: Digital microfluidic design and optimization of classic and new fluidic functions for lab on a chip systems. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics 2008, 4: 159-165. 10.1007/s10404-007-0164-5Google Scholar
- Gong J, Kim CJ: All-electronic droplet generation on-chip with real-time feedback control for EWOD digital microfluidics. Lab on a Chip 2008, 8: 898-906. 10.1039/b717417aGoogle Scholar
- Cooney CG, Chen CY, Emerling MR, Nadim A, Sterling JD: Electrowetting droplet microfluidics on a single planar surface. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics 2006, 2: 435-446. 10.1007/s10404-006-0085-8Google Scholar
- Yi UC, Kim CJ: Characterization of electrowetting actuation on addressable single-side coplanar electrodes. J Micromech Microeng 2006, 16: 2053-2059. 10.1088/0960-1317/16/10/018Google Scholar
- Zhao YJ, Cho SK: Micro air bubble manipulation by electrowetting on dielectric (EWOD): transporting, splitting, merging and eliminating of bubbles. Lab on a Chip 2007, 7: 273-280. 10.1039/b616845kGoogle Scholar
- Priest C, Herminghaus S, Seemann R: Controlled electrocoalescence in microfluidics: Targeting a single lamella. Applied Physics Letters 2006, 89: 134101. 10.1063/1.2357039Google Scholar
- Niu XZ, Gielen F, deMello AJ, Edel JB: Electro-Coalescence of Digitally Controlled Droplets. Analytical Chemistry 2009, 81: 7321-7325. 10.1021/ac901188nGoogle Scholar
- Paik P, Pamula VK, Pollack MG, Fair RB: Electrowetting-based droplet mixers for microfluidic systems. Lab on a Chip 2003, 3: 28-33. 10.1039/b210825aGoogle Scholar
- Paik P, Pamula VK, Fair RB: Rapid droplet mixers for digital microfluidic systems. Lab on a Chip 2003, 3: 253-259. 10.1039/b307628hGoogle Scholar
- Lu HW, Bottausci F, Fowler JD, Bertozzi AL, Meinhart C, Kim CJ: A study of EWOD-driven droplets by PIV investigation. Lab on a Chip 2008, 8: 456-461. 10.1039/b717141bGoogle Scholar
- Schertzer MJ, Ben-Mrad R, Sullivan PE: Using capacitance measurements in EWOD devices to identify fluid composition and control droplet mixing. Sensors and Actuators B-Chemical 2010, 145: 340-347. 10.1016/j.snb.2009.12.019Google Scholar
- Fan SK, Huang PW, Wang TT, Peng YH: Cross-scale electric manipulations of cells and droplets by frequency-modulated dielectrophoresis and electrowetting. Lab on a Chip 2008, 8: 1325-1331. 10.1039/b803204aGoogle Scholar
- Cho SK, Zhao YJ, Kim CJ: Concentration and binary separation of micro particles for droplet-based digital microfluidics. Lab on a Chip 2007, 7: 490-498. 10.1039/b615665gGoogle Scholar
- Park SY, Teitell MA, Chiou EPY: Single-sided continuous optoelectrowetting (SCOEW) for droplet manipulation with light patterns. Lab on a Chip 2010, 10: 1655-1661. 10.1039/c001324bGoogle Scholar
- Chiou PY, Park SY, Wu MC: Continuous optoelectrowetting for picoliter droplet manipulation. Applied Physics Letters 2008, 93: 221110. 10.1063/1.3039070Google Scholar
- Chuang HS, Kumar A, Wereley ST: Open optoelectrowetting droplet actuation. Applied Physics Letters 2008, 93: 064104. 10.1063/1.2970047Google Scholar
- Chiou PY, Chang ZH, Wu MC: Droplet manipulation with light on optoelectrowetting device. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems 2008, 17: 133-138.Google Scholar
- Luk VN, Wheeler AR: A Digital Microfluidic Approach to Proteomic Sample Processing. Analytical Chemistry 2009, 81: 4524-4530. 10.1021/ac900522aGoogle Scholar
- Wheeler AR, Moon H, Bird CA, Loo RRO, Kim CJ, Loo JA, Garrell RL: Digital microfluidics with in-line sample purification for proteomics analyses with MALDI-MS. Analytical Chemistry 2005, 77: 534-540. 10.1021/ac048754+Google Scholar
- Barbulovic-Nad I, Au SH, Wheeler AR: A microfluidic platform for complete mammalian cell culture. Lab on a Chip 2010, 10: 1536-1542. 10.1039/c002147dGoogle Scholar
- Shah GJ, Ohta AT, Chiou EPY, Wu MC, Kim CJ: EWOD-driven droplet microfluidic device integrated with optoelectronic tweezers as an automated platform for cellular isolation and analysis. Lab on a Chip 2009, 9: 1732-1739. 10.1039/b821508aGoogle Scholar
- Hua ZS, Rouse JL, Eckhardt AE, Srinivasan V, Pamula VK, Schell WA, Benton JL, Mitchell TG, Pollack MG: Multiplexed Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction on a Digital Microfluidic Platform. Analytical Chemistry 2010, 82: 2310-2316. 10.1021/ac902510uGoogle Scholar
- Gong J, Kim CJ: Direct-referencing two-dimensional-array digital microfluidics using multilayer printed circuit board. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems 2008, 17: 257-264.Google Scholar
- Luk VN, Mo GCH, Wheeler AR: Pluronic additives: A solution to sticky problems in digital microfluidics. Langmuir 2008, 24: 6382-6389. 10.1021/la7039509Google Scholar
- Yang H, Luk VN, Abeigawad M, Barbulovic-Nad I, Wheeer AR: A World-to-Chip Interface for Digital Microfluidics. Analytical Chemistry 2009, 81: 1061-1067. 10.1021/ac802154hGoogle Scholar
- Bousse L, Cohen C, Nikiforov T, Chow A, Kopf-Sill AR, Dubrow R, Parce JW: Electrokinetically controlled microfluidic analysis systems. ANNU REV BIOPH BIOM 2000, 29: 155-181. 10.1146/annurev.biophys.29.1.155Google Scholar
- Ramos A, Morgan H, Green NG, Castellanos A: Ac electrokinetics: a review of forces in microelectrode structures. Journal of Physics D-Applied Physics 1998, 31: 2338-2353. 10.1088/0022-3727/31/18/021Google Scholar
- Sin MLY, Gau V, Liao JC, Haake DA, Wong PK: Active Manipulation of Quantum Dots using AC Electrokinetics. J Phys Chem C 2009, 113: 6561-6565. 10.1021/jp9004423Google Scholar
- Sin MLY, Shimabukuro Y, Wong PK: Hybrid electrokinetics for separation, mixing, and concentration of colloidal particles. Nanotechnology 2009, 20: 165701. 10.1088/0957-4484/20/16/165701Google Scholar
- Ghosal S: Fluid mechanics of electroosmotic flow and its effect on band broadening in capillary electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 2004, 25: 214-228. 10.1002/elps.200305745Google Scholar
- Ermolina I, Morgan H: The electrokinetic properties of latex particles: comparison of electrophoresis and dielectrophoresis. J Colloid Interf Sci 2005, 285: 419-428. 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.11.003Google Scholar
- Chen L, Lee S, Choo J, Lee EK: Continuous dynamic flow micropumps for microfluid manipulation. J Micromech Microeng 2008, 18: 013001. 10.1088/0960-1317/18/1/013001Google Scholar
- Mruetusatorn P, Mahfouz MR, Wu J: Low-voltage dynamic control for DC electroosmotic devices. Sensor Actuat a-Phys 2009, 153: 237-243. 10.1016/j.sna.2009.05.011Google Scholar
- Unni HN, Keh HJ, Yang C: Analysis of electrokinetic transport of a spherical particle in a microchannel. Electrophoresis 2007, 28: 658-664. 10.1002/elps.200600576Google Scholar
- Castellanos A, Ramos A, Gonzalez A, Green NG, Morgan H: Electrohydrodynamics and dielectrophoresis in microsystems: scaling laws. Journal of Physics D-Applied Physics 2003, 36: 2584-2597. 10.1088/0022-3727/36/20/023Google Scholar
- Visser KR: Electric-Conductivity of Stationary and Flowing Human Blood at Low-Frequencies. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 1992, 30: 636-640.Google Scholar
- Li FA, Huang JL, Shen SY, Wang CW, Her GR: Development of a Liquid-Junction/Low-Flow Interface for Phosphate Buffer Capillary Electrophoresis Mass Spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry 2009, 81: 2810-2814. 10.1021/ac802491yGoogle Scholar
- Breadmore MC, Quirino JP: 100 000-fold concentration of anions in capillary zone electrophoresis using electroosmotic flow controlled counterflow isotachophoretic stacking under field amplified conditions. Analytical Chemistry 2008, 80: 6373-6381. 10.1021/ac8007835Google Scholar
- Lin CH, Wang JH, Fu LM: Improving the separation efficiency of DNA biosamples in capillary electrophoresis microchips using high-voltage pulsed DC electric fields. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics 2008, 5: 403-410. 10.1007/s10404-008-0259-7Google Scholar
- Bertilsson S, Cavanaugh CM, Polz MF: Sequencing-independent method to generate oligonucleotide probes targeting a variable region in bacterial 16S rRNA by PCR with detachable primers. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2002, 68: 6077-6086. 10.1128/AEM.68.12.6077-6086.2002Google Scholar
- Lacher NA, Roberts RK, He Y, Cargill H, Kearns KM, Holovics H, Ruesch MN: Development, validation, and implementation of capillary gel electrophoresis as a replacement for SDS-PAGE for purity analysis of IgG2 mAbs. Journal of Separation Science 2010, 33: 218-227. 10.1002/jssc.200900597Google Scholar
- Lacher NA, Wang O, Roberts RK, Holovics HJ, Aykent S, Schlittler MR, Thompson MR, Demarest CW: Development of a capillary gel electrophoresis method for monitoring disulfide isomer heterogeneity in IgG2 antibodies. Electrophoresis 2010, 31: 448-458. 10.1002/elps.200900371Google Scholar
- Swanson P, Gelbart R, Atlas E, Yang L, Grogan T, Butler WF, Ackley DE, Sheldon E: A fully multiplexed CMOS biochip for DNA analysis. Sensors and Actuators B-Chemical 2000, 64: 22-30. 10.1016/S0925-4005(99)00478-5Google Scholar
- Sosnowski RG, Tu E, Butler WF, OConnell JP, Heller MJ: Rapid determination of single base mismatch mutations in DNA hybrids by direct electric field control. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1997, 94: 1119-1123. 10.1073/pnas.94.4.1119Google Scholar
- Gao J, Yin XF, Fang ZL: Integration of single cell injection, cell lysis, separation and detection of intracellular constituents on a microfluidic chip. Lab on a Chip 2004, 4: 47-52. 10.1039/b310552kGoogle Scholar
- Lee DW, Cho YH: A continuous electrical cell lysis device using a low dc voltage for a cell transport and rupture. Sensors and Actuators B-Chemical 2007, 124: 84-89. 10.1016/j.snb.2006.11.054Google Scholar
- Chang CC, Yang RJ: Electrokinetic mixing in microfluidic systems. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics 2007, 3: 501-525. 10.1007/s10404-007-0178-zMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Ng WY, Goh S, Lam YC, Yang C, Rodriguez I: DC-biased AC-electroosmotic and AC-electrothermal flow mixing in microchannels. Lab on a Chip 2009, 9: 802-809. 10.1039/b813639dGoogle Scholar
- Du E, Manoochehri S: Microfluidic pumping optimization in microgrooved channels with ac electrothermal actuations. Applied Physics Letters 2010, 96: 034102. 10.1063/1.3280076Google Scholar
- Gagnon ZR, Chang HC: Electrothermal ac electro-osmosis. Applied Physics Letters 2009, 94: 024101. 10.1063/1.3020720Google Scholar
- Wang XY, Cheng C, Wang SL, Liu SR: Electroosmotic pumps and their applications in microfluidic systems. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics 2009, 6: 145-162. 10.1007/s10404-008-0399-9Google Scholar
- Williams SJ, Kumar A, Green NG, Wereley ST: Optically induced electrokinetic concentration and sorting of colloids. J Micromech Microeng 2010, 20: 015022. 10.1088/0960-1317/20/1/015022Google Scholar
- Lei KF, Cheng H, Choy KY, Chow LMC: Electrokinetic DNA concentration in microsystems. Sensor Actuat a-Phys 2009, 156: 381-387. 10.1016/j.sna.2009.10.006Google Scholar
- Zhu K, Kaprelyants AS, Salina EG, Markx GH: Separation by dielectrophoresis of dormant and nondormant bacterial cells of Mycobacterium smegmatis. Biomicrofluidics 2010, 4: 022809. 10.1063/1.3435335Google Scholar
- Huber DE, Markel ML, Pennathur S, Patel KD: Oligonucleotide hybridization and free-solution electrokinetic separation in a nanofluidic device. Lab on a Chip 2009, 9: 2933-2940. 10.1039/b901739aGoogle Scholar
- Pommer MS, Zhang YT, Keerthi N, Chen D, Thomson JA, Meinhart CD, Soh HT: Dielectrophoretic separation of platelets from diluted whole blood in microfluidic channels. Electrophoresis 2008, 29: 1213-1218. 10.1002/elps.200700607Google Scholar
- Krishnan R, Sullivan BD, Mifflin RL, Esener SC, Heller MJ: Alternating current electrokinetic separation and detection of DNA nanoparticles in high-conductance solutions. Electrophoresis 2008, 29: 1765-1774. 10.1002/elps.200800037Google Scholar
- Wong PK, Chen CY, Wang TH, Ho CM: Electrokinetic bioprocessor for concentrating cells and molecules. Analytical Chemistry 2004, 76: 6908-6914. 10.1021/ac049479uGoogle Scholar
- Lvovich VF, Matthews E, Riga AT, Kaza L: AC electrokinetic platform for iontophoretic transdermal drug delivery. Journal of Controlled Release 2010, 145: 134-140. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.04.015Google Scholar
- Gagnon Z, Mazur J, Chang HC: Integrated AC electrokinetic cell separation in a closed-loop device. Lab on a Chip 2010, 10: 718-726. 10.1039/b917220cGoogle Scholar
- Sin MLY, Gau V, Liao JC, Wong PK: Electrothermal Fluid Manipulation of High-Conductivity Samples for Laboratory Automation Applications. Jala-J Assoc Lab Aut 2010, 15: 426-432. 10.1016/j.jala.2010.05.004Google Scholar
- Gorkin R, Park J, Siegrist J, Amasia M, Lee BS, Park JM, Kim J, Kim H, Madou M, Cho YK: Centrifugal microfluidics for biomedical applications. Lab on a Chip 2010, 10: 1758-1773. 10.1039/b924109dGoogle Scholar
- Duffy DC, Gillis HL, Lin J, Sheppard NF, Kellogg GJ: Microfabricated centrifugal microfluidic systems: Characterization and multiple enzymatic assays. Analytical Chemistry 1999, 71: 4669-4678. 10.1021/ac990682cGoogle Scholar
- Madou M, Zoval J, Jia GY, Kido H, Kim J, Kim N: Lab on a CD. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 2006, 8: 601-628. 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.8.061505.095758Google Scholar
- Chen JM, Huang PC, Lin MG: Analysis and experiment of capillary valves for microfluidics on a rotating disk. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics 2008, 4: 427-437. 10.1007/s10404-007-0196-xGoogle Scholar
- Siegrist J, Gorkin R, Clime L, Roy E, Peytavi R, Kido H, Bergeron M, Veres T, Madou M: Serial siphon valving for centrifugal microfluidic platforms. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics 2010, 9: 55-63. 10.1007/s10404-009-0523-5Google Scholar
- Park JM, Cho YK, Lee BS, Lee JG, Ko C: Multifunctional microvalves control by optical illumination on nanoheaters and its application in centrifugal microfluidic devices. Lab on a Chip 2007, 7: 557-564. 10.1039/b616112jGoogle Scholar
- Mark D, Metz T, Haeberle S, Lutz S, Ducree J, Zengerle R, von Stetten F: Centrifugo-pneumatic valve for metering of highly wetting liquids on centrifugal microfluidic platforms. Lab on a Chip 2009, 9: 3599-3603. 10.1039/b914415cGoogle Scholar
- Grumann M, Geipel A, Riegger L, Zengerle R, Ducree J: Batch-mode mixing on centrifugal microfluidic platforms. Lab on a Chip 2005, 5: 560-565. 10.1039/b418253gGoogle Scholar
- Lutz VR S, Mark D, Ducree J, Zengerle R, von Stetten F: Unidirectional Shake-Mode for Mixing Highly Wetting Fluids on Centrifugal Platforms. In Twelfth International Conference on Miniaturized Systems for Chemistry and Life Sciences; 12-16 October;. San Diego, California, USA; 2008:748-750.Google Scholar
- Noroozi Z, Kido H, Micic M, Pan HS, Bartolome C, Princevac M, Zoval J, Madou M: Reciprocating flow-based centrifugal microfluidics mixer. Review of Scientific Instruments 2009, 80: 075102. 10.1063/1.3169508Google Scholar
- Haeberle S, Brenner T, Zengerle R, Ducree J: Centrifugal extraction of plasma from whole blood on a rotating disk. Lab on a Chip 2006, 6: 776-781. 10.1039/b604145kGoogle Scholar
- Siegrist J, Gorkin R, Bastien M, Stewart G, Peytavi R, Kido H, Bergeron M, Madou M: Validation of a centrifugal microfluidic sample lysis and homogenization platform for nucleic acid extraction with clinical samples. Lab on a Chip 2010, 10: 363-371. 10.1039/b913219hGoogle Scholar
- Martinez-Duarte R, Gorkin RA, Abi-Samra K, Madou MJ: The integration of 3D carbon-electrode dielectrophoresis on a CD-like centrifugal microfluidic platform. Lab on a Chip 2010, 10: 1030-1043. 10.1039/b925456kGoogle Scholar
- Focke M, Stumpf F, Faltin B, Reith P, Bamarni D, Wadle S, Muller C, Reinecke H, Schrenzel J, Francois P, Mark D, Roth G, Zengerle R, von Stetten F: Microstructuring of polymer films for sensitive genotyping by real-time PCR on a centrifugal microfluidic platform. Lab on a Chip 2010, 10: 2519-2526. 10.1039/c004954aGoogle Scholar
- Lutz S, Weber P, Focke M, Faltin B, Hoffmann J, Muller C, Mark D, Roth G, Munday P, Armes N, Piepenburg O, Zengerle R, von Stetten F: Microfluidic lab-on-a-foil for nucleic acid analysis based on isothermal recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA). Lab on a Chip 2010, 10: 887-893. 10.1039/b921140cGoogle Scholar
- Lee BS, Lee JN, Park JM, Lee JG, Kim S, Cho YK, Ko C: A fully automated immunoassay from whole blood on a disc. Lab on a Chip 2009, 9: 1548-1555. 10.1039/b820321kGoogle Scholar
- Lafleur JP, Rackov AA, McAuley S, Salin ED: Miniaturised centrifugal solid phase extraction platforms for in-field sampling, pre-concentration and spectrometric detection of organic pollutants in aqueous samples. Talanta 2010, 81: 722-726. 10.1016/j.talanta.2009.12.001Google Scholar
- Dubertret B, Calame M, Libchaber AJ: Single-mismatch detection using gold-quenched fluorescent oligonucleotides (vol 19, pg 365, 2001). Nature Biotechnology 2001, 19: 680-681.Google Scholar
- Duffy DC, McDonald JC, Schueller OJA, Whitesides GM: Rapid prototyping of microfluidic systems in poly(dimethylsiloxane). Analytical Chemistry 1998, 70: 4974-4984. 10.1021/ac980656zGoogle Scholar
- Watson MWL, Jebrail MJ, Wheeler AR: Multilayer Hybrid Microfluidics: A Digital-to-Channel Interface for Sample Processing and Separations. Analytical Chemistry 2010, 82: 6680-6686. 10.1021/ac101379gGoogle Scholar
- Smith JE, Medley CD, Tang ZW, Shangguan D, Lofton C, Tan WH: Aptamer-conjugated nanoparticles for the collection and detection of multiple cancer cells. Analytical Chemistry 2007, 79: 3075-3082. 10.1021/ac062151bGoogle Scholar
- Monaghan PB, McCarney KM, Ricketts A, Littleford RE, Docherty F, Smith WE, Graham D, Cooper JM: Bead-based DNA diagnostic assay for chlamydia using nanoparticle-mediated surface-enhanced resonance Raman scattering detection within a lab-on-a-chip format. Analytical Chemistry 2007, 79: 2844-2849. 10.1021/ac061769iGoogle Scholar
- Krishnamoorthy G, Carlen ET, Bomer JG, Wijnperle D, deBoer HL, van den Berg A, Schasfoort RBM: Electrokinetic label-free screening chip: a marriage of multiplexing and high throughput analysis using surface plasmon resonance imaging. Lab on a Chip 2010, 10: 986-990. 10.1039/c000705fGoogle Scholar
- Qian XM, Peng XH, Ansari DO, Yin-Goen Q, Chen GZ, Shin DM, Yang L, Young AN, Wang MD, Nie SM: In vivo tumor targeting and spectroscopic detection with surface-enhanced Raman nanoparticle tags. Nature Biotechnology 2008, 26: 83-90. 10.1038/nbt1377Google Scholar
- Moore BD, Stevenson L, Watt A, Flitsch S, Turner NJ, Cassidy C, Graham D: Rapid and ultra-sensitive determination of enzyme activities using surface-enhanced resonance Raman scattering. Nature Biotechnology 2004, 22: 1133-1138. 10.1038/nbt1003Google Scholar
- Novak L, Neuzil P, Pipper J, Zhang Y, Lee SH: An integrated fluorescence detection system for lab-on-a-chip applications. Lab on a Chip 2007, 7: 27-29. 10.1039/b611745gGoogle Scholar
- Seo S, Isikman SO, Sencan I, Mudanyali O, Su TW, Bishara W, Erlinger A, Ozcan A: High-Throughput Lens-Free Blood Analysis on a Chip. Analytical Chemistry 2010, 82: 4621-4627. 10.1021/ac1007915Google Scholar
- Coskun AF, Su TW, Ozcan A: Wide field-of-view lens-free fluorescent imaging on a chip. Lab on a Chip 2010, 10: 824-827. 10.1039/b926561aGoogle Scholar
- Su TW, Erlinger A, Tseng D, Ozcan A: Compact and Light-Weight Automated Semen Analysis Platform Using Lensfree on-Chip Microscopy. Analytical Chemistry 2010, 82: 8307-8312. 10.1021/ac101845qGoogle Scholar
- Zheng GA, Lee SA, Yang S, Yang CH: Sub-pixel resolving optofluidic microscope for on-chip cell imaging. Lab on a Chip 2010, 10: 3125-3129. 10.1039/c0lc00213eGoogle Scholar
- Wu JG, Cui XQ, Zheng GA, Wang YM, Lee LM, Yang CH: Wide field-of-view microscope based on holographic focus grid illumination. Opt Lett 2010, 35: 2188-2190. 10.1364/OL.35.002188Google Scholar
- Tseng D, Mudanyali O, Oztoprak C, Isikman SO, Sencan I, Yaglidere O, Ozcan A: Lensfree microscopy on a cellphone. Lab on a Chip 2010, 10: 1787-1792. 10.1039/c003477kGoogle Scholar
- Wang J: Electrochemical biosensors: Towards point-of-care cancer diagnostics. Biosensors & Bioelectronics 2006, 21: 1887-1892. 10.1016/j.bios.2005.10.027Google Scholar
- Dungchai W, Chailapakul O, Henry CS: Electrochemical Detection for Paper-Based Microfluidics. Analytical Chemistry 2009, 81: 5821-5826. 10.1021/ac9007573Google Scholar
- Ricci F, Adornetto G, Moscone D, Plaxco KW, Palleschi G: Quantitative, reagentless, single-step electrochemical detection of anti-DNA antibodies directly in blood serum. Chem Commun 2010, 46: 1742-1744. 10.1039/b922595aGoogle Scholar
- Blow N: Microfluidics: in search of a killer application. Nat Methods 2007, 4: 665-668. 10.1038/nmeth0807-665Google Scholar
- Chung S, Sudo R, Vickerman V, Zervantonakis IK, Kamm RD: Microfluidic Platforms for Studies of Angiogenesis, Cell Migration, and Cell-Cell Interactions. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2010, 38: 1164-1177. 10.1007/s10439-010-9899-3Google Scholar
- Zare RN, Kim S: Microfluidic Platforms for Single-Cell Analysis. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, Vol 12 2010, 12: 187-201.Google Scholar
- Gunther A, Yasotharan S, Vagaon A, Lochovsky C, Pinto S, Yang JL, Lau C, Voigtlaender-Bolz J, Bolz SS: A microfluidic platform for probing small artery structure and function. Lab on a Chip 2010, 10: 2341-2349. 10.1039/c004675bGoogle Scholar
- Li G, Chen Q, Li JJ, Hu XJ, Zhao JL: A Compact Disk-Like Centrifugal Microfluidic System for High-Throughput Nanoliter-Scale Protein Crystallization Screening. Analytical Chemistry 2010, 82: 4362-4369. 10.1021/ac902904mGoogle Scholar
- Huang XH, Gordon MJ, Zare RN: Current-Monitoring Method for Measuring the Electroosmotic Flow-Rate in Capillary Zone Electrophoresis. Analytical Chemistry 1988, 60: 1837-1838. 10.1021/ac00168a040Google Scholar
- Joanicot M, Ajdari A: Applied physics - Droplet control for microfluidics. Science 2005, 309: 887-888. 10.1126/science.1112615Google Scholar
- Bringer MR, Gerdts CJ, Song H, Tice JD, Ismagilov RF: Microfluidic systems for chemical kinetics that rely on chaotic mixing in droplets. Philos T Roy Soc A 2004, 362: 1087-1104. 10.1098/rsta.2003.1364Google Scholar
- Pollack MG, Shenderov AD, Fair RB: Electrowetting-based actuation of droplets for integrated microfluidics. Lab on a Chip 2002, 2: 96-101. 10.1039/b110474hGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.