Skip to main content

Detection and quantification of poliovirus infection using FTIR spectroscopy and cell culture



In a globalized word, prevention of infectious diseases is a major challenge. Rapid detection of viable virus particles in water and other environmental samples is essential to public health risk assessment, homeland security and environmental protection. Current virus detection methods, especially assessing viral infectivity, are complex and time-consuming, making point-of-care detection a challenge. Faster, more sensitive, highly specific methods are needed to quantify potentially hazardous viral pathogens and to determine if suspected materials contain viable viral particles. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy combined with cellular-based sensing, may offer a precise way to detect specific viruses. This approach utilizes infrared light to monitor changes in molecular components of cells by tracking changes in absorbance patterns produced following virus infection. In this work poliovirus (PV1) was used to evaluate the utility of FTIR spectroscopy with cell culture for rapid detection of infective virus particles.


Buffalo green monkey kidney (BGMK) cells infected with different virus titers were studied at 1 - 12 hours post-infection (h.p.i.). A partial least squares (PLS) regression method was used to analyze and model cellular responses to different infection titers and times post-infection. The model performs best at 8 h.p.i., resulting in an estimated root mean square error of cross validation (RMSECV) of 17 plaque forming units (PFU)/ml when using low titers of infection of 10 and 100 PFU/ml. Higher titers, from 103 to 106 PFU/ml, could also be reliably detected.


This approach to poliovirus detection and quantification using FTIR spectroscopy and cell culture could potentially be extended to compare biochemical cell responses to infection with different viruses. This virus detection method could feasibly be adapted to an automated scheme for use in areas such as water safety monitoring and medical diagnostics.


Increased population density and movement of people around the globe have generated a rise in the number of outbreaks of infectious diseases and led to the emergence of new infectious diseases [1]. Worldwide, 3.575 million people die each year from water-related diseases [2]. The water and sanitation crises claim more lives through disease than any warfare [2]. A key step in the prevention of outbreaks of communicable diseases is the early detection of virulent particles [3]. Rapid detection of active viral pathogens is of central importance for public health risk assessment and environmental protection. Waterborne viruses are particularly important for public safety monitoring due to their environmental stability and low infectious dose; a single virion is sufficient to initiate illness in previously unexposed, healthy adults [4].

Enteroviruses (family Picornaviridae) are a genus of waterborne viruses that infect humans and other mammals. They are a health problem worldwide, leading to 10 to 15 million cases of symptomatic infection in humans annually in the United States alone [5]. Enteroviruses are single, positive-strand RNA viruses that include polioviruses, Coxsackieviruses and echoviruses, among others. Some enteric virus groups have emerged as waterborne pathogens because of their high levels of resistance to current water treatment processes, which include ultraviolet light inactivation and heat inactivation [6, 7]. Poliovirus was used here as a model virus because a large body of research data exists on the physical, chemical and biological properties of the virus, vaccination is available, and its ease of cell culturing [810]. In addition, poliovirus remains endemic in four countries. During 2002 the rejection of polio immunization led to a worrying resurgence of polio in some areas of Nigeria, followed by re-infection in 21 other countries; resurgence of the disease was also observed in India. Auxiliary vaccination actions were restarted and by 2007 most re-infected countries had become polio-free again. The goal of global polio eradication was re-set to 2010, but concerns continue to be expressed about the progress of this eradication program [11].

Current methods for enterovirus detection use mammalian cell culture and require complex analyses (visible monolayer cytopathic effects) that require several days of laboratory time [12]. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods for the detection of viruses have been developed, offering specificity, speed and cost advantages over cell culture methods [13, 14]. PCR methods alone do not, however, differentiate between the presence of physical (inactive) virus particles and viable (active) virus particles [6, 15]. The major disadvantage of most current methods of virus detection is the inability to provide information about whether a viral particle can start an infection or not. Faster methods with increased sensitivity and specificity are needed to quantify active viral pathogens from medical and environmental samples.

Virus-infected individuals can excrete over 1 billion (109) viruses/g of feces. Some enteric viruses can also be excreted in urine from infected individuals. The presence of these viruses in a human population is variable and reflects current epidemic and endemic conditions [16]. In general, the level of infectious enteric virions in sewage ranges from 100 to 10,000 infectious units/L [1723]. In contaminated surface water, levels of 1-100 infectious enteric virions/L are common. In less polluted surface water, their numbers are closer to 1-10/100 L. Groundwater sources have been shown to have between 0 and 200 infectious enteric virions/100 L, depending on the level of contamination; however, most contaminated groundwater systems are thought to have very low levels (< 2/100 L) [24]. These concentrations were generally obtained through targeted studies, since water and wastewater sources are not routinely monitored for enteric viruses. These measurements are typically performed after an extensive concentrating step which reduces sample volume by 100 to 1000-fold before virus detection is performed.

FTIR spectroscopy is a noninvasive measurement method that has previously been applied for identifying various biological components of cells by detecting vibrations of molecules leading to spectral patterns [12, 25]. It can be used as part of a sensitive method for the detection of specific cellular molecular changes [12, 2630]. Quantitative infrared absorption methods such as FTIR spectroscopy differ from ultraviolet/visible molecular spectroscopic methods because of the greater information content of the spectra. FTIR spectroscopy has been applied in medicine, particularly to study the process of herpes virus infection [31] and in the diagnosis of cancers and other disorders [3235]. In addition, FTIR spectroscopy has been used for the quantification of blood serum components such as glucose, protein, cholesterol and urea [36].

Cell based sensors detect changes in the physiological state of cells following exposure to an environmental stimulus. Changes in cell state can provide information about the stimulus; for example, cells have been used to sense toxins in water samples [37, 38]. Cell based sensors have recently been combine with spectroscopy and applied to viral detection [39, 40]. Cantera et al. [41] used an optical system that involved the use of molecular beacons as a way to detect infective virus particles, resulting in a detection limit of 1 PFU. Using live cells to assist in identifying and quantifying viruses in samples helps to bring the detection closer to an in vivo setting, allowing the natural and complex interactions between cell and virus to be part of the experimental setup.

Here we present the development of a novel strategy for virus detection using a combination of FTIR spectroscopy and live BGMK cells (Figure 1). Specific absorbance patterns are monitored following changes in cell components (such as lipids, proteins, nucleic acids and sugars) subsequent to the virus infection, effectively using the cells as biosensors [42, 43].

Figure 1
figure 1

Schematic representation of viral detection method using cell culture and FTIR spectroscopy (not to scale).


Microscopy of cell structure on crystal

The way in which cells attach in monolayer culture depends on the cell type and the characteristics of the surface. BGMK cells were confirmed to be biocompatible with the ZnSe crystals for transmission measurements. The organization of the actin cytoskeleton exhibited a good distribution throughout the cell volume with many focal adhesion points that resulted in a spread phenotype on the stiff surface, indicating actin assembly by healthy cells. The cell architecture of the BGMK cells attached to the ZnSe crystal can be seen in Figure 2a. Actin, vinculin and cell nuclei were stained to study cell adhesion of BGMK cells on the ZnSe crystal. Figure 2b shows the cells under bright field microscopy, where they can be seen elongated and spread out over the crystal surface.

Figure 2
figure 2

Microscopy of BGMK cells attached on ZnSe crystal (actin filaments, vinculin and nuclei) and bright field image of BGMK cells. a) Confocal image of BGMK cells adhered to a ZnSe crystal. Actin (red), Vinculin (green) and cell nuclei (blue) are shown. b) Bright microscopy image of BGMK cells adhered to a ZnSe crystal.

Optimal time for virus detection

BGMK cells were infected with poliovirus PV1 at different multiplicities of infection (m.o.i.) of 10 PFU (0 - 106 PFU/ml) and studied at 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 12 h.p.i. Virus infection regression models were developed to correlate changes in spectral features with time of infection. Changes in the spectra varied depending on the progress of the viral infection, with biochemical alterations appearing in poliovirus infected cells within 2 h.p.i. Example regression models for 1.5, 4, 6 and 8 h.p.i. are shown in Figure 3 and a summary of the regression model parameters are given in Table 1. This table shows the comparison between the error of calibration (RMSEC) and the root mean square error of crossvalidation, RMSECV, which is a mesure of a model's ability to predict samples that were not used to build the model (leave-one-out-crossvalidation). RMSECV was analyzed to determine the optimum number of latent variables (LVs) to include in the PLS model. The number of LVs of a PLS model is usually optimized by performing a cross-validation and minimizing the corresponding RMSECV. The RMSECV decreases with the inclusion of each additional initial factor, reaching a minimum value with a certain number of latent variables. The best choice of number of latent variables is also supported by the variance capture in Y. The goal is to identify a subset of the measured variables that gives the lowest RMSECV, which is the most useful and accurate regression model. General calibration procedure consists in the selection of the pretreatment (preprocessing of the spectra), wavelength intervals, and number of latent variables to be driven by minimizing the RMSECV [44]. An infection time of 8 h was selected for subsequent experiments based on these results and on the reported viral replication time [44]. For more information on the spectra of 8 h and 12 h uninfected control cells see Additional File 1 and Additional File 2 respectively.

Figure 3
figure 3

Poliovirus prediction models comparing the estimated PFU and predicted PFU at 1.5 - 8 h.p.i. Each point represent the predicted number of virus by the model for each sample exposed to different viral titers, × axis represent the estimated number of virus used. The green lines indicate a 1:1 regression model.

Table 1 Comparison of poliovirus prediction models using different infrared regions and virus titers

Viral infection at 8 h.p.i

Spectra of cells at 8 h.p.i infected with different m.o.i. of PV1 are shown in Figure 4. Interval Partial Least Square (iPLS) was performed to determine the optimal regions of the spectra used in the virus detection model, an interval size of 10 cm-1 and a maximum of 8 latent variables were chosen. These 9 areas of the spectra correspond to the following wavenumbers: 660.90 - 667.26, 806.11 - 823.46, 844.68 - 862.03, 979.67 - 997.03, 1095.38 - 1112.74, 1191.80 - 1209.16, 1230.37 - 1267.02 and 1326.80 - 1344.16 cm-1.

Figure 4
figure 4

FTIR spectra showing changes in absorbance when cells are infected with poliovirus. Spectra in the wavelength region of 650 - 3600 cm-1 show the absorbance of BGMK cells infected with different PV1 titers 101 - 104 PFU/ml at 8 h.p.i. Uninfected cells served as a control. Nine regions were chosen by the PLS model as the most informative for detecting changes in cell components following virus infection. The different colors represent the mean spectra of the samples.

Changes in absorbance can be correlated with the development of poliovirus infection. The region between 600 - 900 cm-1 corresponds to C2' endo/anti (B-form helix) conformation, DNA and RNA molecules. 1000 to 1300 cm-1 relates to symmetric stretching mode of dianionic phosphate monoester in phosphorylated proteins and left handed helix DNA (Z form) [45].

Figure 5 shows a regression model of poliovirus at 8 h.p.i. that correlates changes in absorbance spectra with virus infection titer. This model has a root mean square error of cross validation (RMSECV) of 0.57 log. Similar results were achieved using the whole spectral region or the nine regions selected by iPLS (data not shown). This method can detect a viral titer of 101 - 102 PFU/ml with a RMSECV of 17 PFU/ml; at higher titers, 102 - 104 PFU/ml, a RMSECV of 2009 PFU/ml for 8 h.p.i. was achieved.

Figure 5
figure 5

Regression analysis for cells infected with PV1 at 8 h.p.i. This model uses 7 latent variables. The regression uses a log scale and 0 - 103 PFU/ml in the 650 - 1600 cm-1 wavenumber region.

Effect of virus titer on characteristic spectra peak height at 8 h.p.i

The characteristic peaks of the BGMK cell line showed changes in relative absorbance following infection with different viral titers. These peaks correspond to different biomolecules. A graphical representation of the absorbance values of the eighteen characteristic peaks of each data set for the different infection titers (106, 105, 104, 103, 102 and 101 PFU/ml) for the 8 h.p.i. time point is given in Figure 6. A summary of the change in peak height upon virus infection and the corresponding biomolecules represented at the peak wavenumbers are given in Table 2.

Figure 6
figure 6

Average peak absorbance values compared to uninfected control for different virus titers at 8 h.p.i. Error bars show standard error. Note that 1654 cm-1 was used to normalize the data and therefore shows no change.

Table 2 Observed changes in relative peak absorbance values with corresponding biomolecules

Some trends are evident for the change in peak heights at different titers. For example, lower virus concentrations (102 and 103 PFU/ml) showed negative values relative to controls at 1399 - 2956 cm-1, indicating a decrease in the amount of a specific biochemical component. In contrast, the mean absorbance of the cells with higher virus titers (104, 105 and 106 PFU/ml) only showed average increases in absorbance across all peaks relative to uninfected controls.

The most significant differences were found for the peak at 3293 cm-1, assigned to OH stretching (One-way ANOVA, d.f. 6, F = 7.63, p < 0.0001), for which the 106 PFU/ml sample had significantly lower absorbance than the 101 PFU/ml sample (Tukey-Kramer HSD, α = 0.05). The 106 PFU/ml sample and uninfected control had significantly lower absorbance than the 101 - 105 PFU/ml samples at this wavenumber (Tukey-Kramer HSD, α = 0.05). A significant difference was found for the peak at 1043 cm-1 assigned to glycogen (One-way ANOVA, d.f. 6, F = 2.47, p = 0.032) [46, 47] for which the absorbance of the 101 PFU/ml sample was significantly higher than the absorbance of the uninfected control (Tukey-Kramer HSD, α = 0.05). Alterations in glycogen have been described in neurons of monkeys infected with poliovirus [48].

The mean absorbance values for the different titers at the 700 cm-1 (ANOVA, d.f. 6, F = 2.37, p = 0.0383) and 835 cm-1 (ANOVA, d.f. 6, F = 2.36, p = 0.0387) peaks also formed significantly separate groups. The absorbance for the 1079 cm-1 (ANOVA, d.f. 6, F = 2.08, p = 0.0659), 1313 cm-1 (ANOVA, d.f. 6, F = 1.99, p = 0.0781), 2852 cm-1 (ANOVA, d.f. 6, F = 1.89, p = 0.0942), 2924 cm-1 (ANOVA, d.f. 6, F = 2.16, p = 0.0575) titers showed consistent trends.

CPE analysis

The error associated with a standard CPE analysis was compared to the error of the new FTIR spectroscopy with cell culture method. The results of this assay are shown in Table 3. Standard error was calculated from duplicate experiments except where there were too many PFUs to count accurately. The average standard error was 12.0% of the mean estimated number of PFU/ml. For comparison, the error of cross validation was ~17% of the mean across titers using the FTIR with cell culture method. Note that these calculations assume a perfect serial dilution to obtain the starting known viral titers.

Table 3 CPE Analysis for Poliovirus at a virus titer of 107 PFU/ml.


Cells infected with poliovirus PV1 showed consistent alterations in their infrared spectral features. The broad, undulating features observed relatively weakly in the spectra of entire cells has been previously attributed to Mie scattering of the cellular nuclei [49, 50]. The overall variations in intensity in the initial method are most likely due to variations in the thickness of the cell, as well as the nucleus/cytoplasm (N/C) ratio.

Multiple chemometric models were developed using a variety of pre-processing approaches, different spectral regions and different latent variables. This method could detect a viral titer of 101 - 102 PFU/ml with a RMSECV of 17 PFU/ml in cells at 8 h.p.i. At higher titers the accuracy decreased slightly, for example at 102 - 104 PFU/ml, a RMSECV of 2009 PFU/ml for 8 h.p.i. was achieved. Changes in cell spectral features become apparent initially at 2 h.p.i, but detection accuracy is best at 8 h.p.i.

Changes in cell absorbance spectra were correlated with specific cell components to better understand the progress of the poliovirus infection. The most significant changes were associated with an increase in the peak assigned to OH stretching, particularly at low virus titers. Another significant change associated with infection was an increase in the peak assigned to symmetric stretching vibration of PO2 due to RNA and DNA, which was most evident in the 101 PFU/ml virus titer. Broad cis-C-H out of plane bend and center handed helix of DNA also showed significant changes associated with PV1 infection.

To obtain the high level of sensitivity required substantial method development steps. Initial experiments resulted in models with a high level of error. In the initial approach cells were grown in a culture flask, trypsin was used to detach the cells, they were centrifuged and transferred to the ZnSe crystals for transmission measurements. Growing cells directly on the thin ZnSe crystals used a greatly simplified protocol, removing many steps where error and sample handling variation could occur. The direct cultivation method produced cleaner, more stable spectral patterns and had a higher reproducibility compared to the initial method.

This virus detection method was consistently more accurate for lower virus titers. This could be because the lower titers cause less variation in the viral infection process of adsorption and penetration inside of each individual cell. For example, at low titers the virus particles may be invading the cells in synchrony, causing more equal changes in the cell components among cells. With many virus particles present there might be more than one virus infecting each cell, meaning that the stage of infection is not synchronized among cells. Cantera et al. [41, 51] have reported greater success for detection of lower virus titers of poliovirus after 12 h.p.i. It may be that for lower virus infection it is necessary to wait longer until the cells reach some steady infection state so that the changes in cell components are saturated, causing the overall signal pattern to stabilize.

An infection period of eight hours had the lowest RMSECV of the times tested here (Table 1, Figure 7). Poliovirus replicates and lyses the cell in approximately 8 h [44] and a previous study using molecular beacons also found this time period to be the best for viral quantification [41]. Eight hours of infection was found to be the best for detection of poliovirus with a method based on engineered BGMK cells expressing fluorescent proteins undergoing fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) [51] and [52]. Perhaps this is the time point when the most dramatic changes in cell components are occurring [51], meaning that the eight hour time point in our protocol may be just prior to virus release from infected cells, producing a better prediction model of the infection (Figure 7). Note that our method does not require any modification to the sacrificial cells and as such can have the recognition element readily changed.

Figure 7
figure 7

Hours Post-Infection vs. Root Mean Square Error of Cross Validation. Graph shows the corresponding RMSECV for the experiments using 1.5, 4, 6 and 8 h.p.i. The lowest RMSECV value was achieved using an infection time of 8 h.p.i.,which corresponds to the best prediction model.

A CPE assay is the standard method for enterovirus detection and requires three to fourteen days to perform depending on the virus type. The poliovirus assay takes three to ten days during which the presence of a virus is marked by the death of animal cells in culture [3]. The cells are grown in a monolayer in a semi-solid media such that new virus particles infect surrounding cells. Cells killed by the virus form a plaque and the remaining living cells are stained with a dye. Another method, integrated cell culture-PCR (ICC-PCR), is a faster molecular detection method that can identify low levels of viable virus [3]. A sample is applied to cell culture and then molecular methods are used to detect replicating virus in the cell culture. This method takes 1 to 3 days from infecting the cells, depending on the replication time of the virus [13].

The cell culture-FTIR process has a distinct advantage over standard PCR methods since it provides information on viral infectivity and is inherently a multiplexed method; it does not however provide information on the specific type of viral infection. We envision this approach as being on the front end of a comprehensive screening process upstream of a more time consuming but more specific method such as cell culture-PCR to later determine the identity of the virus only for samples that indicate the presence of such an infective component.


Here we present a fast new method for the detection of low titers of viable poliovirus using mammalian cells as a biosensor combine with FTIR spectroscopy to detect changes in cell components. Virus titers from 101 - 106 PFU/ml were assayed over a range of infection times from 1 h.p.i. - 12 h.p.i., with detection most accurate at low titers from 101 -104 PFU/ml. Prediction models of infected cells were best detected as early as 6 h.p.i., and had the most accurate prediction of virus titer at 8 h.p.i. The model gave a RMSECV of 17 viral particles. The major changes in cell components following virus infection were an increase in the peak 3293 cm-1 and negative trend in the absorbance for lipids region (3200 - 2800 cm-1) in the poliovirus infected cells with 102 - 103 PFU/ml.

The cell culture method is still considered the standard for viral diagnosis as it has the advantages of detecting infectious viral particles and the ability to achieve low detection limits [6]. Combining the cell culture method with FTIR spectroscopy, we can enhance the cell culture method with the increased speed of FTIR spectroscopy. This new method has the potential to be extended for the detection of other viruses and adapted into a portable, automated system for detection of viruses from environmental samples.


Protocol development

An overview of the method is presented in Figure 1. Experiments were performed in a biosafety cabinet under laminar flow to maintain aseptic conditions. Our first experiments involved growing cells on the plastic surface of 24-well plates, removing the cells with an enzymatic treatment, pelleting the cells by centrifugation and then transferring them to ZnSe crystals for transmission measurements, allowing them to dry on the crystal to scan using FTIR spectroscopy. Spectra were collected in a transmission mode with light passing through both the cells and the underlying ZnSe crystal. Several changes were made to the initial method to optimize both the laboratory steps and the spectra results by reducing the room for variation between experimental replicates. We present both methods for comparison.

Cell culture

BGMK cells were selected due to their high sensitivity to enteroviruses and previous use [53]. Cells were grown in T25 flasks to a confluent monolayer in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) with 584 mg/L L-glutamine (Cellgro) containing 0.1% NaHCO3, 10,000 units/ml penicillin, 10,000 μg/ml streptomycin (HyClone) and 10% (vol/vol) fetal bovine serum (FBS; HyClone) and buffered with 12 mM HEPES. Reagents were from Sigma Chemical Co. unless otherwise noted. Cells were cultured at 37°C in a humidifying incubator with 5% carbon dioxide and passaged when confluent, approximately every two days. Cells were detached from the growth flask with 2.5% EDTA-trypsin, centrifuged at 18 g for 8 minutes, resuspended in media and transferred into a flask of fresh media.

Initial method

T25 flasks with 95% confluent cell monolayers were trypsinized, resuspended in media and seeded in the eight central wells of a 24-well plate. The wells were individually seeded with 125,000 cells in 1 ml of media. Cells were grown to 100% confluence by incubating for 24 h at 37°C and 5% CO2. 0.5 ml of media was removed from the well and replaced with 0.5 ml of virus. A minimum of two control samples per experiment were inoculated with virus-free media using the same incubation time for infected and uninfected cells. Following viral exposure, cells were detached with 70 µL of trypsin per well and pelleted by centrifugation at 18 × g for 8 minutes. The cells were washed with 1 ml of 0.9% NaCl to remove any residual cell media then resuspended in 20 μL of 0.9% NaCl saline solution.

Revised method

Several changes to the initial method were made to reduce the room for variation between experimental replicates, including growing the cells directly on the ZnSe crystals for transmission measurements. Individual ZnSe crystals were located in the eight central wells of a 24-well plate and seeded with 150,000 cells with a final volume of 1 ml DMEM media per well in a 24-well plate and incubated for 24 h to allow cell attachment to the crystal surface. After the 24 h incubation time, 0.5 ml of media was removed from the well and replaced with 0.5 ml of the virus titer. A minimum of two control samples per experiment were inoculated with virus-free media and incubated for the same period of time.

Following the virus infection, ZnSe crystals were removed from the aqueous medium allowing them to dry at room temperature for a minimum of 8 h. Spectra were collected in a transmission mode with light passing through both the cells and the underlying ZnSe crystal. An estimated 100,000 cells were scanned per ZnSe crystal. ZnSe crystals were washed with soap, pure acetone and sterilized in 70% EtOH between uses. Experiments with different infection times were performed with the initial method. The 8 h.p.i. and 12 h.p.i. experiments were subsequently performed with the revised method.

Virus titers and infection times

Multiple serial dilutions were made from the initial stock concentration of 107 PFU/ml of purified vaccine strain PV1 (LSc-2ab) using different time of infection experiments. Previous studies observed molecular and morphological changes in poliovirus infected cells within 2 h.p.i. [44]. This infection time was therefore used as a starting point for identification of the optimum incubation time. BGMK cells were infected with PV1 at m.o.i. of 10 PFU (0 - 106 PFU/ml) and studied at 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 12 h.p.i. Different viral titers were made using DMEM with 10% NCS.

FTIR spectroscopy

Infrared spectra of healthy cells and cells post-infection were collected in transmission mode on a ThermoNicolet Magna 560 FTIR spectrometer equipped with a liquid nitrogen-cooled MCT-A detector, KBr beamsplitter and infrared light source. The spectral collection parameters used were 128 co-added scans and a spectral resolution of 4 cm-1 with a 20% aperture opening, performed using OMNIC 7.3 (Thermo Electron Corporation).

Preprocessing of spectra

Preprocessing was performed to reduce noise and other interferences in the data. This included computation of the first derivative of spectral intensity with respect to wavenumber, vector normalization using amide I as the maximum absorbance equal to unity and mean center. Spectral expansion emphasized the most diagnostic "mid-IR" region between 650 and 1700 cm−1 and eliminated a large spectral range (1800 - 2800 cm−1), which contains no vibrational spectroscopic information.

Data analysis

Collection of the spectra was performed using OMNIC 7.3 (Thermo Electron Corporation). Analysis of spectra was carried out using the PLS toolbox. PLS is a multivariate method to analyze noisy, strongly collinear (correlated) data with numerous X-variables [54, 55]. iPLS assisted in the selection of the most informative spectral regions. OMNIC 7.3 was used to find the absorbance values of the eighteen characteristic peaks for the different infection titers for 8 h.p.i. Differences among peak heights were analyzed using JMP version 8.0 with a one-way ANOVA. Pair-wise comparisons of peak height were performed using a Tukey-Kramer HSD test that corrects for multiple comparisons.

The analysis utilizes a "leave-one-out". In brief, the entire data set serves as the calibration, save for one sample that is employed as the prediction or validation sample. The ability to predict the concentration in this one sample is evaluated and tabulated then the one sample is returned to the calibration set, another sample is selected, and the process is repeated. In this way each sample serves as a blind assessment of prediction capability. The method the review suggests would only evaluate a small number of samples and so would not be as robust of an assessment.

Microscopy of cell structure on crystal

An Actin Cytoskeleton and Focal Adhesion Staining Kit (Millipore) was used to visualize the architecture of cells attached to titanium oxide (data not shown) and ZnSe crystals and to perform immunohistochemistry to observe the focal adhesion points and actin filaments in the cells. Actin was stained using TRITC conjugated Phalloidin and nuclei with DAPI. The average cell height on titanium oxide was determined using a z-axis stack of cell images.

Cytopathic effect assay

A CPE assay was conducted as described previously [3]. Briefly, a poliovirus sample of 107 PFU/ml was diluted in series. 1 ml of 1% (wt/vol) carboxymethylcellulose in maintenance medium (with 2% FBS) was overlaid onto an infected-cell monolayer. After 48 h at 37°C, plaques were stained with 0.8% (wt/vol) crystal violet in 3.7% (vol/vol) formaldehyde.



cytopathic effect


Fourier transform infrared


buffalo green monkey kidney


plaque forming units


(DMEM) Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium


new calf serum


polymerase chain reaction


ribonucleic acid


deoxyribonucleic acid


root mean square error of cross validation


root mean square error of calibration


poliovirus 1


fetal bovine serum


Interval Partial Least Square

multiplicity of infection:


hours post-infection:



  1. Jones KE, Patel NG, Levy MA, Storeygard A, Balk D, Gittleman JL, Daszak P: Global trends in emerging infectious diseases. Nature 2008, 451: 990-993. 10.1038/nature06536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pruss-Ustun A, Bos R, Gore F, Bartram J: Safe water, better health: costs, benefits and sustainability of interventions to protect and promote health. World Health Organization, Geneva 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Reynolds K, Gerba C, Pepper I: Detection of infectious enteroviruses by an integrated cell culture-PCR procedure. Appl Environ Microbiol 1996, 62: 1424-1427.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schiff GM, Stefanovic GM, Young B, Pennekamp JK: Minimum human infectious dose of enteric viruses (echovirus-12) in drinking water. In Enteric viruses in water Edited by: Melnick JL. 1984, 15: 222-228.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Non-polio enterovirus infections, Division of viral Diseases Centers for Disease Control and Prevention[]

  6. Koopmans M, Duizer E: Foodborne viruses: an emerging problem. International Journal of Food Microbiology 2004, 90: 23-41. 10.1016/S0168-1605(03)00169-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gerba CP, Gramos DM, Nwachuku N: Comparative Inactivation of Enteroviruses and Adenovirus 2 by UV Light. Appl Environ Microbiol 2002, 68: 5167-5169. 10.1128/AEM.68.10.5167-5169.2002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Karttunen Å, Pöyry T, Vaarala O, Ilonen J, Hovi T, Roivainen M, Hyypiä T: Variation in enterovirus receptor genes. Journal of Medical Virology 2003, 70: 99-108. 10.1002/jmv.10352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wimmer E, Cu T, Cao X: Genetics of poliovirus. Palo Alto, CA, ETATS-UNIS: Annual Reviews 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gerba CP: Applied and Theoretical Aspects of Virus Adsorption to Surfaces. In Advances in Applied Microbiology. Volume 30. Edited by: Allen IL. Academic Press; 1984:133-168.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rey M, Girard MP: The global eradication of poliomyelitis: Progress and problems. Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 2008, 31: 317-325. 10.1016/j.cimid.2007.07.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mantsch HH, Chapman D: Infrared spectroscopy of biomolecules. New York: Wiley-Liss; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Reynolds KA, Gerba CP, M A, IL P: ICC/PCR detection of enteroviruses and hepatitis A virus in environmental samples. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 2001, 47: 153-157. 10.1139/w00-134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nijhuis M, van Maarseveen N, Schuurman R, Verkuijlen S, de Vos M, Hendriksen K, van Loon AM: Rapid and Sensitive Routine Detection of All Members of the Genus Enterovirus in Different Clinical Specimens by Real-Time PCR. J Clin Microbiol 2002, 40: 3666-3670. 10.1128/JCM.40.10.3666-3670.2002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Metcalf GT, Melnick LJ, Estes KM: Environmental virology: from detection of virus in sewage and water by isolation to identification by molecular biology: a trip of over 50 years. Palo Alto, CA, ETATS-UNIS: Annual Reviews; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fields BN, Knipe DM, Howley PM: Fields virology. 3rd edition. Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia, PA; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sano Daisuke, Matsuo , Takahiro , Omura , Tatsuo : Virus-binding proteins recovered from bacterial culture derived from activated sludge by affinity chromatography assay using a viral capsid peptide. Washington, DC, ETATS-UNIS: American Society for Microbiology; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sedmak G, Bina D, MacDonald J, Couillard L: Nine-Year Study of the Occurrence of Culturable Viruses in Source Water for Two Drinking Water Treatment Plants and the Influent and Effluent of a Wastewater Treatment Plant in Milwaukee, Wisconsin (August 1994 through July 2003). Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2005, 71: 1042-1050. 10.1128/AEM.71.2.1042-1050.2005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gerba CP, Rose JB, Singh SN, Farrah SR: Waterborne gastroenteritis and viral hepatitis. Critical Reviews in Environmental Control 1985, 15: 213-236. 10.1080/10643388509381732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. AWWA: Waterborne Pathogens. AWWA Manual of Water Practices M48, American Water Works Association, Denver, CO 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Scipioni A, Daube G, Thiry E: Contamination of food and water by human pathogenic viruses. Annales de Medecine Veterinaire 2000, 144: 207-221.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pina S, Buti M, Jardí R, Clemente-Casares P, Jofre J, Girones R: Genetic analysis of hepatitis A virus strains recovered from the environment and from patients with acute hepatitis. Journal of General Virology 2001, 82: 2955-2963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dorner SM, Anderson WB, Gaulin T, Candon HL, Slawson RM, Payment P, Huck PM: Pathogen and indicator variability in a heavily impacted watershed. London, ROYAUME-UNI: IWA Publishing; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  24. US EPA, (2006a): 40 CFR Parts 9, 141 and 142. National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Ground Water Rule. Final rule Fed Regist 2006,71(216):65573-65660.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Erukhimovitch V, Talyshinsky M, Souprun Y, Huleihel M: FTIR Microscopy Detection of Cells Infected With Viruses. DNA Viruses 2005, 292: 161-172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jackson M, Kim K, Tetteh J, Mansfield JR, Dolenko B, Somorjai RL, Orr FW, Watson PH, Mantsch HH: Cancer diagnosis by infrared spectroscopy: methodological aspects. In San Jose, CA, USA. Edited by: Mantsch HH, Jackson M. SPIE; 1998:24-34.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vargas CA, Wilhelm AA, Williams J, Lucas P, Reynolds KA, Riley MR: Integrated Capture and Spectroscopic Detection of Viruses. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009, 75: 6431-6440. 10.1128/AEM.02036-08

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Riley MR, Lucas P, Le Coq D, Juncker C, Boesewetter DE, Collier JL, DeRosa DM, Katterman ME, Boussard-Plédel C, Bureau B: Lung cell fiber evanescent wave spectroscopic biosensing of inhalation health hazards. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 2006, 95: 599-612. 10.1002/bit.21152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lucas P, Le Coq D, Juncker C, Collier J, Boesewetter DE, Boussard-Plédel C, Bureau B, Riley MR: Evaluation of Toxic Agent Effects on Lung Cells by Fiber Evanescent Wave Spectroscopy. Appl Spectrosc 2005, 59: 1-9. 10.1366/0003702052940387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wilhelm AA, Lucas P, Reynolds K, Riley MR: Integrated capture and spectroscopic detection of viruses in an aqueous environment. In San Jose, CA, USA. Edited by: Gannot I. SPIE; 2008:68520K-68528.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Erukhimovitch V, Mukmanov I, Talyshinsky M, Souprun Y, Huleihel M: The use of FTIR microscopy for evaluation of herpes viruses infection development kinetics. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 2004, 60: 2355-2361. 10.1016/j.saa.2003.12.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Argov S, Ramesh J, Salman A, Sinelnikov I, Goldstein J, Guterman H, Mordechai S: Diagnostic potential of Fourier-transform infrared microspectroscopy and advanced computational methods in colon cancer patients. Journal of Biomedical Optics 2002, 7: 248-254. 10.1117/1.1463051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Dukor KR, Liebman NM, Johnson LB: A New, Non-Destructive Method For Analysis of Clinical Samples with FT-IR Microspectroscopy. Breast Cancer Tissue As An Example. Noisy-Le-Grand, Royaume-Uni: Cellular And Molecular Biology; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wang HP, Wang HC, Huang YJ: Microscopic FTIR studies of lung cancer cells in pleural fluid. Science of The Total Environment 1997, 204: 283-287. 10.1016/S0048-9697(97)00180-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Choo LP, Mansfield JR, Pizzi N, Somorjai RL, Jackson M, Halliday WC, Mantsch HH: Infrared spectra of human central nervous system tissue: Diagnosis of alzheimer's disease by multivariate analyses. Biospectroscopy 1995, 1: 141-148. 10.1002/bspy.350010208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shaw AR, Kotowich S, Mantsch HH, Leroux M: Quantitation Of Protein, Creatinine, And Urea In Urine By Near-Infrared Spectroscopy. Amsterdam, Pays-Bas: Elsevier; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Stenger DA, Gross GW, Keefer EW, Shaffer KM, Andreadis JD, Ma W, Pancrazio JJ: Detection of physiologically active compounds using cell-based biosensors. Trends in Biotechnology 2001, 19: 304-309. 10.1016/S0167-7799(01)01690-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Banerjee P, Bhunia AK: Mammalian cell-based biosensors for pathogens and toxins. Trends in Biotechnology 2009, 27: 179-188. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sakudo A, Suganuma Y, Kobayashi T, Onodera T, Ikuta K: Near-infrared spectroscopy: Promising diagnostic tool for viral infections. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 2006, 341: 279-284. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.12.153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hastings G, Krug P, Wang R, Guo J, Lamichhane HP, Tang T, Hsu Y-s, Ward J, Katz D, Hilliard J: Viral infection of cells in culture detected using infrared microscopy. Analyst 2009, 134: 1462-1471. 10.1039/b902154j

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Cantera JL, Chen W, Yates MV: A simple, rapid and sensitive flow cytometry method to detect infective poliovirus based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) technology. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009, AEM.01851-01809.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Pancrazio JJ, Whelan JP, Borkholder DA, Ma W, Stenger DA: Development and Application of Cell-Based Biosensors. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 1999, 27: 697-711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Haes AJ, Van Duyne RP: A Nanoscale Optical Biosensor: Sensitivity and Selectivity of an Approach Based on the Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Spectroscopy of Triangular Silver Nanoparticles. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2002, 124: 10596-10604. 10.1021/ja020393x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Koch F, Koch G: The molecular biology of poliovirus. Wien: Springer-Verlag; 1985.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  45. Movasaghi Z, Rehman S, ur Rehman DI: Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy of Biological Tissues. Applied Spectroscopy Reviews 2008, 43: 134-179. 10.1080/05704920701829043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Yano K, Ohoshima S, Gotou Y, Kumaido K, Moriguchi T, Katayama H: Direct Measurement of Human Lung Cancerous and Noncancerous Tissues by Fourier Transform Infrared Microscopy: Can an Infrared Microscope Be Used as a Clinical Tool? Analytical Biochemistry 2000, 287: 218-225. 10.1006/abio.2000.4872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Takahashi S, Satomi A, Yano K, Kawase H, Tanimizu T, Tuji Y, Murakami S, Hirayama R: Estimation of glycogen levels in human colorectal cancer tissue: relationship with cell cycle and tumor outgrowth. Journal of Gastroenterology 1999, 34: 474-480. 10.1007/s005350050299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Graves IL: Effects of poliovirus and of guanidine on the metabolism of glycogen in HeLa cells. Journal of Virology 1967,1(5):1098-1099.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Romeo M, Mohlenhoff B, Diem M: Infrared micro-spectroscopy of human cells: Causes for the spectral variance of oral mucosa (buccal) cells. Vibrational Spectroscopy 2006, 42: 9-14. 10.1016/j.vibspec.2006.04.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Mohlenhoff B, Romeo M, Diem M, Wood BR: Mie-Type Scattering and Non-Beer-Lambert Absorption Behavior of Human Cells in Infrared Microspectroscopy. Biophysical Journal 2005, 88: 3635-3640. 10.1529/biophysj.104.057950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Cantera JL, Chen W, Yates MV: Detection of Infective Poliovirus by a Simple, Rapid, and Sensitive Flow Cytometry Method Based on Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Technology. Appl Environ Microbiol 2010, 76: 584-588. 10.1128/AEM.01851-09

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Hwang Y-C, Chen W, Yates MV: Use of Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer for Rapid Detection of Enteroviral Infection In Vivo. Appl Environ Microbiol 2006, 72: 3710-3715. 10.1128/AEM.72.5.3710-3715.2006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Huang YT, Yam P, Yan H, Sun Y: Engineered BGMK Cells for Sensitive and Rapid Detection of Enteroviruses. J Clin Microbiol 2002, 40: 366-371. 10.1128/JCM.40.2.366-371.2002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Liebmann B, Filzmoser P, Varmuza K: Robust and classical PLS regression compared. Journal of Chemometrics 2010, 24: 111-120. 10.1002/cem.1279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Abdi H: Partial least squares regression and projection on latent structure regression (PLS Regression). Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics 2010, 2: 97-106. 10.1002/wics.51

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


FLM was funded by a CONACYT fellowship. This work was supported in part by the NIEHS sponsored Southwest Environmental Health Sciences Center #P30 ES06694. Dr. Charles Gerba and Dr. Kelly Reynolds generously provided purified vaccine strain poliovirus type 1 (PV1, LSc-2ab), at University of Arizona. Doug Cromey and Dr. Brooke Beam helped with the confocal images and Jonathan Sexton assisted with CPE analysis of the virus samples used in the development of this method.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark R Riley.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

FLM conducted the experiments, performed the data analysis, participated in the design and coordination of experiments and drafted the manuscript. MR and KR conceived of the study and participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material


Additional file 1: Mean Absorbance Spectra of Uninfected BGMK Cells Incubated for 8 h. Mean absorbance of uninfected cells for the spectral region between 3600 - 650 cm-1 after 8 h of incubation on ZnSe crystals. Blue dashed lines show standard deviation. (TIFF 189 KB)


Additional file 2: Mean Absorbance Spectra of Uninfected BGMK Cells Incubated for 12 h. Mean absorbance of uninfected cells for the spectral region between 3600 - 650 cm-1 after 12 h of incubation on ZnSe crystals. Blue dashed lines show standard deviation. (TIFF 210 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee-Montiel, F.T., Reynolds, K.A. & Riley, M.R. Detection and quantification of poliovirus infection using FTIR spectroscopy and cell culture. J Biol Eng 5, 16 (2011).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: