Open Access

Three-dimensional (3D) evaluation of liquid distribution in shake flask using an optical fluorescence technique

Journal of Biological Engineering201711:28

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13036-017-0070-7

Received: 5 June 2017

Accepted: 18 July 2017

Published: 3 August 2017

Abstract

Background

Biotechnological development in shake flask necessitates vital engineering parameters e.g. volumetric power input, mixing time, gas liquid mass transfer coefficient, hydromechanical stress and effective shear rate. Determination and optimization of these parameters through experiments are labor-intensive and time-consuming. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) provides the ability to predict and validate these parameters in bioprocess engineering. This work provides ample experimental data which are easily accessible for future validations to represent the hydrodynamics of the fluid flow in the shake flask.

Results

A non-invasive measuring technique using an optical fluorescence method was developed for shake flasks containing a fluorescent solution with a waterlike viscosity at varying filling volume (VL = 15 to 40 mL) and shaking frequency (n = 150 to 450 rpm) at a constant shaking diameter (do = 25 mm). The method detected the leading edge (LB) and tail of the rotating bulk liquid (TB) relative to the direction of the centrifugal acceleration at varying circumferential heights from the base of the shake flask. The determined LB and TB points were translated into three-dimensional (3D) circumferential liquid distribution plots. The maximum liquid height (Hmax) of the bulk liquid increased with increasing filling volume and shaking frequency of the shaking flask, as expected. The toroidal shapes of LB and TB are clearly asymmetrical and the measured TB differed by the elongation of the liquid particularly towards the torus part of the shake flask.

Conclusion

The 3D liquid distribution data collected at varying filling volume and shaking frequency, comprising of LB and TB values relative to the direction of the centrifugal acceleration are essential for validating future numerical solutions using CFD to predict vital engineering parameters in shake flask.

Keywords

Shake flaskThree dimensional (3D) liquid distributionLeading edge of bulk liquid (LB)Tail of bulk liquid (TB)CFDCircumferential liquid distributionMaximum liquid height

Background

Shake flasks and stirred bioreactors are amongst the popular choice in the development of biotechnological processes. Shake flasks are widely used for biological screenings and process optimizations for the simplicity in geometry, orderly parallel experiments, ease of operation and its low operating cost [1]. In the last years, the main engineering parameters, for instance volumetric power input [26], mixing time [7], gas-liquid mass transfer coefficient [812], hydromechanical stress [2, 8, 13] and effective shear rate [14] have been characterized. These vital engineering parameters are significantly governed by the hydrodynamic state in the system in which they influence the yield and quality of the final product in a bioprocess [15].

Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) modeling has been used to predict some of the above mentioned engineering parameters like volumetric power input and gas-liquid mass transfer coefficient. Zhang et al. [16] and Li et al. [17] simulated two-phase flow fields locating the free interfacial surface area in shake flasks. They predicted the volumetric mass transfer and compared it to the work of Maier and Büchs [9]. It deepens insights about the fluid dynamics within a shake flask. The volume-of-fluid (VOF) method has been applied to solve the continuity equation of Navier Stokes [16, 17] for free surface flows which can also be found in other orbitally shaken (microplate or cylindrical well) and wave-mixed bioreactor systems [18]. However, in some cases, the models derived may not completely elucidate the real situation in the bioreactors. This might be due to the assumptions of the limited boundary conditions, the applied turbulence models chosen and the spatial and temporal discretization of the transport phenomena to a finite-space grid used [15, 18]. Therefore, to answer the numerical uncertainties, CFD models have to be validated or calibrated by measured data.

Many investigations using CFD have been done with stirred bioreactors [15, 1820] and orbitally shaken bioreactors [16, 17, 2125]. However, to get measured data to validate the CFD simulation proves to be a big challenge. In a stirred bioreactor, the interior fluid flow of the bulk liquid is induced by impeller stirring and shows a quite complex pattern. The typical gassed liquid-air dispersions increase the complexity level of fluid flow determination [26]. The details may comprise of the flow of the impeller region, either simple shear, diverging, converging or rotational vortex flows [27]. Therefore, detailed fluid velocity data from the interior of the bulk liquid in the stirred vessel are needed. For that, a precise and reliable technique is required. The fluid flow data for the bulk liquid can be measured by using contactless and contacting measurement techniques which are e.g. particle image velocimetry [26, 28, 29], laser doppler anemometry [30] and hot film anemometer [31]. In short, the complete 3D characterization of fluid flows in stirred bioreactors requires measurement techniques that are difficult, highly sophisticated and very time-consuming [19].

There were also some attempts to characterize the hydrodynamics of the flow behavior in shake flasks by using particle image velocimetry and laser light tracer methods with different geometries (unbaffled, baffled and coiled) at shaking frequencies of 150 rpm [32], 200 rpm [32] and 80 to 100 rpm [33]. Mixing dynamics in relation to velocity fields and turbulent intensities were reported.

Shake flasks are different from stirred bioreactors. The former develop a specific shape of the rotating bulk liquid inside the bioreactors, resulting from the rotating centrifugal field. Thus, this shape of the liquid provides an excellent source of information for the validation of CFD simulations. In relation to gas-liquid mass transfer, the hydrodynamics of fluids with waterlike viscosity in shake flask can be described by a ‘two-sub-reactor model’ [1012], defining mass transfer through the liquid film on the flask wall and base (falling film system) and the bulk liquid rotating within the flask (mixed stirred tank reactor system). Based on this ‘two-sub-reactor model’ the mass transfer area (a) and the mass transfer coefficient (kL) were modeled and compared with measured values at a broad range of operating conditions. The agreement was found to be quite satisfactory. In stirred bioreactor, the liquid position with a horizontal surface is well defined, nonetheless, containing no information. However, as mentioned above, for shake flasks, it is assumed that the shape and the position of the rotating bulk liquid relative to the centrifugal acceleration contain enough information to validate CFD calculations. Therefore, a more complicated measuring approach may not particularly be required.

Previously, the liquid distribution in shake flasks has theoretically been estimated by a simplifying approach disregarding viscosity of the liquid and assuming an ideal frictionless fluid motion [9, 10, 34]. It was reported that the intersection between the rotational paraboloid of the liquid and the inner wall of the shake flasks produces a symmetrical body for the liquid. Validation was undertaken by comparing the computed maximum liquid height to the measured values from photographs [9]. It was also shown that the predicted absolute values of the gas-liquid mass transfer area agree well with those measured by the accelerated sulfite system, if the liquid film formed on the inner glass wall of the flask by the rotating bulk liquid was also taken into account [9]. However, a qualitative comparison of photographs with simulation results of the simplified model of liquid distribution [34], clearly elucidate differences. Whereas the simulated liquid distributions are inherently symmetrical, the real distributions are clearly asymmetrical, showing an extended elongated tail. The same approach was also used in large disposable orbitally shaken cylindrical vessels formulating a well-defined liquid distribution of the bulk liquid, resulting from an intersection between the rotational liquid paraboloid and the cylindrical bioreactor wall [35].

It is the aim of this paper to extend and improve the assessment of the rotating bulk liquid distribution in shake flask. The measuring principle is derived from the previous work reported by Ottow et al. [22] by using a non-invasive optical fluorescence technique. The mentioned work [22] reported successful measurement of the well defined leading edge and tail of the rotating bulk liquid at one single height (14.74 mm). In this current work, angular circumferential rotating bulk liquid positions at 14 specific heights are detected, collecting extensive measured data of liquid distribution in shake flasks. Such data can provide useful input for future CFD modeling representing the fluid dynamics in shake flasks. Consequently, the CFD predictions of volumetric power input, mixing time, gas-liquid mass transfer coefficient, hydromechanical stress and effective shear rate in shake flask can be verified. This paper shows three-dimensional (3D) presentations of the liquid distribution by the angular positions of the leading edge and the tail of the bulk liquid. Extensive data obtained at a specific shaking diameter, different shaking frequencies and filling volumes were based on the circumferential rotating bulk liquid at the wall around the shake flask. It should be noted that in this study, the information of the depth of the rotating bulk liquid perpendicular to the flask wall was not assessed. Doing that would be much more difficult as a usual shake flask is optically not a perfectly symmetrical body and calibration of the liquid depth would be extremely demanding.

Method

Experimental setup of the optical fluorescence measurement technique

A 5 μM fluorescein solution (Fluorescein Acid Yellow 73, Aldrich, Germany) was used as the fluorescent model solution, buffered with a 100 mM phosphate buffer (Na2HPO4.2H2O ≥ 99%; NaH2PO4.H2O ≥ 98%; Roth, Germany) and adjusted to pH 8 with 5 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH).

Figure 1a and b show schematic diagrams of the measuring setup for the liquid distribution. Fourteen pairs of plastic optical fibers (8: Poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) with cladding material, Conrad Components, Germany) were held in brass holders (14). Two corresponding holders were separated by an angle of 45o (6). The pairs were arranged vertically to the side of a 250-mL shake flask wall (7: Schott Duran, Germany). The height started at 2 mm to 67 mm (with an increment of 5 mm) from the base of the shake flask. Each pair has a 2-mm optical fiber (15) with a core of a 1-mm transparent fiber, one (5) from the light source (light emitting diode) to the shake flask having the fluorescein solution (17) and the other one (9) was from the shake flask to the light receiver (photomultiplier tube) (11).
Fig. 1

Liquid distribution measurement in shake flasks using an optical fluorescence technique. a shows a schematic diagram of the liquid distribution measurement setup for 250-mL shake flask. b shows a top view of the optical fiber arrangement at the side of the shake flask wall. c, d and e show a side view, close-up view and 45o distant view of the optical fiber arrangement to the shake flask, respectively. 1) Orbital shaker. 2) Hall sensor. 3) Magnet for triggering. 4) Light-emitting diode (LED) supplying excitation blue light (465 nm). 5) Optical fiber channeling the excitation blue light to the shake flask. 6) 45o angle distance of the optical fiber arrangement (seen from top view). 7) 250-mL shake flask clamped onto the orbital shaker’s table. 8) Enlarged view of the 14 different measurement positions to the side of the shake flask wall. Fourteen pairs of optical fibers were arranged vertically at these specified different heights from the base of the shake flask. 9) Optical fiber channeling the emission light (515 nm) from the shake flask to the photomultiplier tube (PMT). 10) Enlarged view of the bundle of 14 optical fibers. 11) Enlarged view of the PMT’s light sensitive area attached with a bundle of 14 optical fibers. 12) Data acquisition module (analog-to-digital converter). 13) Computer. 14) Brass holder for optical fibers. 15) Transparent core of optical fiber. 16) Shake flask wall. 17) Rotating fluorescent aqueous solution

Blue Indium Gallium Nitride (InGaN) light-emitting diodes (4: Kingbright, Germany) supplied blue excitation light at a peak wavelength of 465 nm. They were alternately switched on at different heights. All of the 14 pairs of optical fibers channeling the emission lights from the shake flask were bundled (10) to be in contact to a 15-mm width (11) of the light sensitive area at a photomultiplier tube (Hamamatsu H7827–001, Japan). The blue excitation lights illuminated the fluorescein solution which resulted in emission lights at the peak wavelength of 518 nm. A long pass optical filter (OG 515, Reichmann, Germany) that was positioned prior to the photomultiplier tube, filtered the signals received to the wavelength of above 515 nm only. Subsequently, a low noise amplifier and an analog-to-digital converter (A/D) (12) amplified and converted the analog signals, using a data acquisition card. The digitized signals were expressed as output voltage (V) and recorded by a computer (13) for further interpretations.

A 250-mL shake flask is comprised of the torus with a radius of 13 mm and the conical upper part. The shapes of the torus and conical parts of the shake flask were calculated accordingly as proposed by [34]. The 250-mL shake flask was pretreated with a boiling 20% nitric acid (HNO3) solution to create hydrophilic conditions at the inner flask wall. The washed and cooled pretreated flask with the attached optical fiber arrangement was then clamped onto the orbital shaker’s table (1: Kuhner, Switzerland) having a hall sensor (2). During a rotation, as the hall sensor was in alignment with a magnet (3) fixed at the shaker’s table, the recording of the signals (output voltage) started. For better viewing of the optical fiber arrangement on the shake flask, Fig. 1c–e show a side view, a close-up photo and a 45o distance view of the measurement setup, respectively.

Using the above described setup, experiments were conducted with varying filling volumes (VL = 15 to 40 mL with an increment of 5 mL) of fluorescein solution at varying shaking frequencies (n = 150 to 450 rpm with an increment of 25 rpm). The shaking diameter was kept constant at 25 mm.

Liquid distribution detection

The measurement setup on the shaker’s table rotated in a clockwise direction (top view). As illustrated in Fig. 2, the uniform rotational motion created centrifugal forces outward along the circumference of the shaking diameter orbit on the bulk liquid (not-to-scale drawn dashed red lines). For better interpretation, 90o incremental angular positions were set as a basis to the liquid’s location in a shake flask. The location of the set of optical fibers was referred to be at the 0o plane. For a better understanding of the liquid distribution to be later translated into three-dimensional (3D) plots (see Fig. 4), an eye viewpoint was chosen. The eye viewpoint was positioned to be at the 90o plane as shown in the figure.
Fig. 2

Shifts of the positions of the rotating bulk liquid in a 250-mL shake flask (40-mm radius) for one complete orbital rotation (illustration is not-to-scale). The start point of a clockwise rotation is at the position 1 when the magnet triggers the hall sensor located at the shaker. Centrifugal forces (red arrows) induced by the orbital rotation exert the bulk liquid towards the wall side of the shake flask along the orbital diameter. The leading edge of a bulk liquid (LB) defines the circulating shift around the shake flask’s circumference having 360o circular angle. Tail of a bulk liquid (TB) follows LB circulation in the shake flask. The eye symbol indicates the reference viewing position for the three-dimensional plot as shown in Figs. 4b and 5. a depicts the close-up illustration of the shake flask orientation on angular circular position of liquid detection (θ) [o] and Cartesian coordinates of X and Y axes (+X and –X, +Y and –Y). The positive and negative X and Y orientations will be useful for 3D liquid distribution plots in the subsequent figures

The liquid distribution measuring setup recorded the signals every time the liquid moved to the front and passed by the optical fiber’s location. Ten complete rotational motions starting from position 1 were recorded to give an average data of liquid distribution in shake flask. The front of the rotating bulk liquid was depicted as the leading edge of the bulk liquid (LB). On the other hand, the end of the bulk liquid was defined as the tail of the bulk liquid (TB). The recorded liquid distribution was a plot of output voltage [V] against the 360o angle of the liquid’s location in the shake flask [o].

Figure 3 shows an example of a liquid distribution data plot for VL = 25 mL of 5 μM fluorescein solution in a 250-mL shake flask, rotated at n = 200 rpm and do = 25 mm. It was measured at a height of 22 mm from the base of the shake flask. In this figure, the liquid distribution plot was divided into the following sequence: (starting from the left) the low horizontal line (a: minimal slope and minimal output voltage), abrupt ascending curve (b: high positive slope with increasing output voltage), indicating the leading edge (LB) of the bulk liquid, high horizontal curved line (c: minimal slope and maximal output voltage) and the descending curve (d: high to moderate negative slope with decreasing output voltage) indicating the tail of the bulk liquid (TB). LB and TB angular positions were determined by determining the points of the intersection between (a) and (b) as well as between (a) and (d), respectively. This was done by applying linear regression method on the LB and TB regions. The method was justified by a goodness of fit (R2) which was higher than 95%. For instance, in Fig. 3, the determined LB and TB angular positions were identified at 104.84o and 306.85o, respectively.
Fig. 3

Example of measured liquid distribution data (360o circular angle) plotted as output voltage [V] relative to the maximum values of the output voltage [Vmax] for a 250-mL shake flask rotating at 200 rpm shaking frequency and 25 mm shaking diameter. The recorded liquid distribution data shown is the results of the averaged values from 10 rotations observed at the position 1 from Fig. 2. The flask was filled with 25 mL of a 5 μM fluorescein solution with 100 mM phosphate buffer (pH 8). The measurement was taken at a height of 22 mm from the base of the shake flask. The intersecting points between the lines of ‘a’ and ‘b’ as well as between the lines of ‘a’ and ‘d’ lead to the leading edge (LB) and the tail of the bulk liquid (TB), respectively. LB and TB determined are identified at 104.84o and 306.35o, respectively

Result and Discussion

Three-dimensional plot

Having all the data collected about the liquid distribution at specific operating conditions of the flask, the 3D liquid distribution plots of the bulk liquid on the wall of the shake flask were prepared. Figure 4a shows an example of the liquid distribution data at the heights of 2 mm to 57 mm from the base of the shake flask with an increment of 5 mm for VL = 40 mL, n = 400 rpm and do = 25 mm. More examples of liquid distribution data are also presented (Additional file 1: Figure S1). The figure depicts the relative output voltage (V/Vmax) value which was defined as the ratio of the measured output voltage to the maximum output voltage detected at each height, versus the 360o circular angle of the shake flask’s circumference. The torus and conical part were referred to as V/Vmax readings at the heights of 2 mm to 12 mm and the heights of above 17 mm, respectively. As observed, the width of the rotating bulk liquid circulating the shake flask became smaller to the higher measurement position at the conical part starting from the height of 17 to 57 mm. From the liquid distribution plots (Fig. 4a), LB and TB angular positions were determined according to the method as illustrated in Fig. 3. These angular positions were translated into the corresponding 3D liquid distribution in the shake flask (Fig. 4b). The three-dimensional shape of the shake flask was formed based on 8 vertical planes of 45o angle each. The location of the optical fibers was at the 0o position. The 3D plot orientation is in accordance to the eye position viewpoint as shown in Fig. 2. The chosen eye position allows clearer view of the leading edge (LB) and the tail (TB) of the bulk liquid for the chosen parameters selected. As illustrated in Fig. 4b, the LB was plotted as green solid circle and TB as red solid triangle at each height. The green and red lines connecting the LB and TB angular positions, respectively, represented the circumferential liquid distribution on the shake flask’s wall. The curve fitting lines were obtained by using a shape preserving interpolation model, specifically the Piecewise Cubic Hermite Interpolating Polynomial (PCHIP) as available in MATLAB.
Fig. 4

Measured liquid distribution data (360o circular angle) for a 250-mL shake flask containing 40 mL of an aqueous 5 μM fluorescein solution with 100 mM phosphate buffer (pH 8). Measurement conditions are 400 rpm of shaking frequency and 25 mm of shaking diameter. a shows the output voltage [V] relative to the maximum values of the output voltage [Vmax] detected. The leading edge (LB) and tail of the bulk liquid (TB) are observed at varying heights starting from 2 mm to 57 mm (with an increment of 5 mm) from the base of the shake flask. The heights of 2 mm to 12 mm refer to the torus of the flask; the heights of 17 mm to 57 mm refer to the conical part (see Fig. 1). b depicts the three-dimensional (3D) bulk liquid positions for LB (green solid circle and line) and TB (red solid triangle and line) at the shake flask’s wall based on determined angle values [o] at varying heights. The location of the optical fiber is referred at the 0o circular angle of the shake flask. The direction of the centrifugal force is pointing from left to right. The LB and TB are observed at azimuth and elevation angles of 180o and 6o, respectively

Figure 4b observes that the exerted rotating bulk liquid concentrated towards the 180o plane in the direction of the centrifugal force. On the other hand, the tail of the bulk liquid was as if dragging behind the leading edge of the bulk liquid. According to the earlier simplifying liquid distribution model [34], the shape of the rotating bulk liquid should be symmetrical for both the LB and TB. However, the measured liquid distribution data clearly did not reveal a symmetrical LB and TB relative position. Instead, the TB angular positions were elongated to an additional 90o covering a longer circumferential area. A preliminary comparison of measured data generated in this work and corresponding CFD simulation, originating from the work of Ottow et al. [22] shows a satisfactory agreement (Additional file 2 Figure S2). This implies that the depth of the rotating bulk liquid on the flask wall is obviously in reality lower than predicted by the simplifying non-viscosity model [34], what is not an unexpected finding.

Effect of filling volume to maximum liquid height (Hmax), positions of leading edge (LB) and tail of rotating bulk liquid (TB)

In this investigation, the filling volume was varied while all the other parameters were held constant. Figure 5a–c depict the compilations of the 3D liquid distribution plots for varying filling volumes (VL = 15 to 40 mL with an increment of 5 mL), at three different shaking frequencies (n = 150, 250 and 350 rpm) and at a constant shaking diameter (do = 25 mm).
Fig. 5

Three-dimensional (3D) illustrations of the bulk liquid position in a 250-mL shake flask containing 5 μM fluorescein solution with 100 mM phosphate buffer (pH 8), rotated at 25 mm of shaking diameter, with the same viewing direction as in Figs. 2 and 4. The leading edge (LB) and tail of the bulk liquid (TB) are observed at azimuth and elevation angles of 180o and 6o, respectively. a, b and c indicate 3D illustrations of the bulk liquid with varying filling volume and shaking frequency of VL = 15 to 40 mL (at an increment of 5 mL) and n = 150, 250 and 350 rpm, respectively. d, e and f show 3D illustrations of the bulk liquid with varying shaking frequency and filling volume of n = 150 rpm to 400 rpm (at an increment of 25 and 50 rpm) and VL = 15, 25 and 40 mL, respectively

Figure 5a shows the change of the maximum liquid height (Hmax) (in the z direction) as well as the LB and TB positions with varying VL at n = 150 rpm. At VL of 15 to 40 mL (with an increment of 5 mL), Hmax values are between 25.9 to 33.8 mm from the base of shake flask, respectively. It is obvious that Hmax increases as VL increases. It is also observed that the LB positions sequentially shift with increasing VL into the clockwise direction (left), relative to the centrifugal acceleration. On the other hand, despite the increasing VL, TB positions, particularly at the lower torus part, do not differ as much as that seen at the conical upper part of the shake flask.

The above findings are confirmed by Fig. 5b and c with n of 250 and 350 rpm, respectively. The Hmax for VL of 15 to 40 mL (with an increment of 5 mL) is recorded to be from 35.4 mm to 47.0 mm and from 42.0 mm to 56.1 mm, for n of 250 and 350 rpm, respectively. Visibly, the rise of Hmax is influenced relatively to the increasing VL. Additionally, higher VL also shifts the LB and TB positions except for the TB positions at the torus part of the shake flask, as described before. The LB and TB shifts are fairly consistent relative to the increase of VL.

Effect of shaking frequency to maximum liquid height (Hmax), positions of leading edge (LB) and tail of rotating bulk liquid (TB)

Figure 5d–f show 3D liquid distribution plots of the rotating bulk liquid at a fixed do of 25 mm, with varying n = 150 to 400 rpm and at specific VL of 15, 25 and 40 mL, respectively. Fig. 5d reports on the change of the Hmax for a VL of 15 mL at varying n. Hmax values are between 25.9 and 46.1 mm are recorded for n of 150 to 400 rpm, respectively. It is concluded that Hmax increases as n increases. The LB positions shift sequentially following the counter clockwise direction (right), relative to the centrifugal acceleration, as n increases. The phenomena illustrates as such that for a constant VL, the bulk liquid is pushed with higher n upward and inward, to the conical and torus parts of the shake flask, respectively. In contrast to what is seen for TB positions at constant n and varying VL (see Fig. 5a–c), the TB positions distancing themselves a little apart from each other, particularly at the torus part of the shake flask.

Figure 5e and f with VL of 25 and 40 mL, respectively, confirmed the above assessments. It is clearly seen that as n increases, Hmax also increases. As in Fig. 5e, the Hmax values are between 29.8 mm to 52.0 mm for n of 150 to 400 rpm (with an increment of 50 rpm), respectively. Whilst in Fig. 5f, for n of 150 to 400 rpm, the Hmax values are from 33.8 mm to 61.4 mm, respectively.

Conclusion

An extended non-invasive measurement method for assessing the liquid distribution in shake flasks by using an optical fluorescence technique was developed. It consists of 14 sets of optical fibers, 14 light-emitting diodes and one photomultiplier tube, employed for all 14 measurement positions and a fluorescein solution. The 3D circumferential distributions of the rotating bulk liquid were analyzed at varying circumferential heights starting from the base of the shake flask (torus) and extended upward to the conical part. A preliminary comparison of measured data generated in this work and corresponding CFD simulation shows a satisfactory agreement. Leading edge and tail of bulk liquid closely resemble circumferentially in shake flask to the CFD simulation. The information contained in the systematically collected data is very valuable for calibrating and validating Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations, to better understand the hydrodynamic flow of fluid in shake flasks. This approach is essential for the numerical determination of some vital engineering parameters for example volumetric power input, mixing time, gas-liquid mass transfer coefficients, hydromechanical stress and effective shear rate in bioprocess development using shaking flasks. In a succeeding paper, varying liquid distributions CFD calculations utilizing the measured data from this work, initiated at higher viscosities will be reported.

Abbreviations

3D: 

Three-dimensional

CFD: 

Computational Fluid Dynamics

do

Shaking diameter

Hmax

Maximum liquid height

LB: 

Leading edge of bulk liquid

M: 

Molar

mL: 

Milliliter

mm: 

Millimeter

mM: 

Millimolar

n

Shaking frequency

Na2HPO4.2H2O: 

Disodium hydrogen phosphate dihydrate

NaH2PO4.H2O: 

Sodium dihydrogen phosphate monohydrate

nm: 

Nanometer

rpm: 

Revolution per minute

TB: 

Tail of bulk liquid

µM: 

Micromolar

V: 

Output voltage

VL

Filling volume

Vmax

Maximum output voltage

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Udo Kosfeld and Herbert Alt for the electrical and mechanical technical assistances, respectively, as well as to Rahadi Ranom for MATLAB analytics/data mining programming.

Funding

We thank the Malaysia’s Ministry of Higher Learning of Education as scholarship giver to the first author (AA) during the project.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article.

Author’s contributions

AA made the conceptual design of the liquid distribution measurement device on the shake flask with the assistance of the electrical and mechanical workshops of the chair, performed the experimental investigations, conducted the result data interpretation, drafted and revised the manuscript. JB initiated the project, financed the resources (AVT), supervised the conceptual design of the liquid distribution measurement, assisted the data interpretation and advised proper corrections of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA
(2)
Aachener Verfahrenstechnik, Biochemical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University

References

  1. Büchs J. Introduction to advantages and problems of shaken cultures. Biochem Eng J. 2001;7(2):91–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Klöckner W, Büchs J. Bioreactor – Design. Shake-Flask Bioreactors. In: Moo-Young M, editor. Comprehensive Biotechnology, Elsevier, vol. 2011. Second ed; 2011. p. 213–26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Büchs J, Maier U, Milbradt C, Zoels B. Power consumption in shaking flasks on rotary shaking machines: I. Power consumption measurement in unbaffled flasks at low liquid viscosity. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2000;68(6):589–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Büchs J, Maier U, Milbradt C, Zoels B. Power consumption in shaking flasks on rotary shaking machines: II. Nondimensional description of specific power consumption and flow regimes in unbaffled flasks at elevated liquid viscosity. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2000;68(6):594–601.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Büchs J, Zoels B. Evaluation of maximum to specific power consumption ratio in shaking bioreactors. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan. 2001;34(5):647–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Peter CP, Suzuki Y, Rachinskiy K, Lotter S, Büchs J. Volumetric power consumption in baffled shake flasks. Chem Eng Sci. 2006;61(11):3771–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Tan RK, Eberhard W, Büchs J. Measurement and characterization of mixing time in shake flasks. Chem Eng Sci. 2011;66(3):440–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Klöckner W, Büchs J. Advances in shaking technologies. Trends Biotechnol. 2012;30(6):307–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Maier U, Büchs J. Characterisation of the gas–liquid mass transfer in shaking bioreactors. Biochem Eng J. 2001;7(2):99–106.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Maier U, Losen M, Büchs J. Advances in understanding and modeling the gas–liquid mass transfer in shake flasks. Biochem Eng J. 2004;17(3):155–67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Giese H, Azizan A, Kümmel A, Liao A, Peter CP, Fonseca JA, Hermann R, Duarte TM, Büchs J. Liquid films on shake flask walls explain increasing maximum oxygen transfer capacities with elevating viscosity. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2014;111(2):295–308.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Meier K, Klöckner W, Bonhage B, Antonov E, Regestein L, Büchs J. Correlation for the maximum oxygen transfer capacity in shake flasks for a wide range of operating conditions and for different culture media. Biochem Eng J. 2016;109:228–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Peter CP, Suzuki Y, Büchs J. Hydromechanical stress in shake flasks: correlation for the maximum local energy dissipation rate. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2006;93(6):1164–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Giese H, Klöckner W, Peña C, Galindo E, Lotter S, Wetzel K, Meissner L, Peter CP, Büchs J. Effective shear rates in shake flasks. Chem Eng Sci. 2014;118:102–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Sharma C, Malhotra D, Rathore AS. Review of computational fluid dynamics applications in biotechnology processes. Biotechnol Prog. 2011;27(6):1497–510.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Zhang H, Williams-Dalson W, Keshavarz-Moore E, Shamlou PA. Computational-fluid-dynamics (CFD) analysis of mixing and gas–liquid mass transfer in shake flasks. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2005;41(1):1–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Li C, Xia JY, Chu J, Wang YH, Zhuang YP, Zhang SL. CFD analysis of the turbulent flow in baffled shake flasks. Biochem Eng J. 2013;70:140–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Werner S, Kaiser SC, Kraume M, Eibl D. Computational fluid dynamics as a modern tool for engineering characterization of bioreactors. Pharm Bioprocess. 2014;2(1):85–99.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Hutmacher DW, Singh H. Computational fluid dynamics for improved bioreactor design and 3D culture. Trends Biotechnol. 2008;26(4):66–172.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Joshi JB, Nere NK, Rane CV, Murthy BN, Mathpati CS, Patwardhan AW, Ranade VV. CFD simulation of stirred tanks: Comparison of turbulence models (Part II: Axial flow impellers, multiple impellers and multiphase dispersions). Can J Chem Eng. 2011;89(4):754–816.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Weheliye W, Yianneskis M, Ducci A. On the fluid dynamics of shaken bioreactors—flow characterization and transition. AICHE J. 2013;59(1):334–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Ottow W, Kümmel A, Büchs J. Shaking flask: flow simulation and validation, VDI Fortschrittsberichte, Conference on Transport Phenomena with Moving Boundaries, 9th-10th October, Berlin (Kraume). Germany. 2004;270-279Google Scholar
  23. Zhu L-k, B-y S, Wang Z-l, Monteil DT, Shen X, Hacker DL, De Jesus M, Wurm FM. Studies on fluid dynamics of the flow field and gas transfer in orbitally shaken tubes. Biotechnol Progress. 2017;33:192–200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Discacciati M, Hacker D, Quarteroni A, Quinodoz S, Tissot S, Wurm FM. Numerical simulation of orbitally shaken viscous fluids with free surface. Int J Numer Methods Fluids. 2013;71(3):294–315.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Tissot S, Reclari M, Quinodoz S, Dreyer M, Monteil DT, Baldi L, Hacker DL, Farhat M, Discacciati M, Quarteroni A, Wurm FM. Hydrodynamic stress in orbitally shaken bioreactors. BMC proceedings. 2011;5(8):39.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Hall JF, Barigou M, Simmons MJH, Stitt EH. A PIV study of hydrodynamics in gas–liquid high throughput experimentation (HTE) reactors with eccentric impeller configurations. Chem Eng Sci. 2005;60(22):6403–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Venkat RV, Stock LR, Chalmers JJ. Study of hydrodynamics in microcarrier culture spinner vessels: a particle tracking velocimetry approach. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1996;49(4):456–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Wille M, Langer G, Werner U. The influence of macroscopic elongational flow on dispersion processes in agitated tanks. Chemical Engineering & Technology. 2001;24(2):119–27.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Willert CE, Gharib M. Digital particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids. 1991;10(4):181–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Jaworski Z, Nienow AW, Dyster KN. An LDA study of the turbulent flow field in a baffled vessel agitated by an axial, down-pumping hydrofoil impeller. Can J Chem Eng. 1996;74(1):3–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Bruun HH. Hot-film anemometry in liquid flows. Meas Sci Technol. 1996;7(10):1301.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Mancilla E, Palacios-Morales CA, Córdova-Aguilar MS, Trujillo-Roldán MA, Ascanio G, Zenit R. A hydrodynamic description of the flow behavior in shaken flasks. Biochem Eng J. 2015;99:61–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Kurata K, Mita H. Qualitative analysis of liquid movement within shake culture flasks using a flow visualization technique. International Symposium on Plant Production in Closed Ecosystem. 1996; 440 August: 545–548.Google Scholar
  34. Büchs J, Maier U, Lotter S, Peter CP. Calculating liquid distribution in shake flasks on rotary shakers at waterlike viscosities. Biochem Eng J. 2007;34(3):200–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Klöckner W, Lattermann C, Pursche F, Büchs J, Werner S, Eibl D. Time efficient way to calculate oxygen transfer areas and power input in cylindrical disposable shaken bioreactors. Biotechnol Prog. 2014;30(6):1441–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement