Skip to main content

Assembly of eukaryotic algal chromosomes in yeast



Synthetic genomic approaches offer unique opportunities to use powerful yeast and Escherichia coli genetic systems to assemble and modify chromosome-sized molecules before returning the modified DNA to the target host. For example, the entire 1 Mb Mycoplasma mycoides chromosome can be stably maintained and manipulated in yeast before being transplanted back into recipient cells. We have previously demonstrated that cloning in yeast of large (> ~ 150 kb), high G + C (55%) prokaryotic DNA fragments was improved by addition of yeast replication origins every ~100 kb. Conversely, low G + C DNA is stable (up to at least 1.8 Mb) without adding supplemental yeast origins. It has not been previously tested whether addition of yeast replication origins similarly improves the yeast-based cloning of large (> 150 kb) eukaryotic DNA with moderate G + C content. The model diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum has an average G + C content of 48% and a 27.4 Mb genome sequence that has been assembled into chromosome-sized scaffolds making it an ideal test case for assembly and maintenance of eukaryotic chromosomes in yeast.


We present a modified chromosome assembly technique in which eukaryotic chromosomes as large as ~500 kb can be assembled from cloned ~100 kb fragments. We used this technique to clone fragments spanning P. tricornutum chromosomes 25 and 26 and to assemble these fragments into single, chromosome-sized molecules. We found that addition of yeast replication origins improved the cloning, assembly, and maintenance of the large chromosomes in yeast. Furthermore, purification of the fragments to be assembled by electroelution greatly increased assembly efficiency.


Entire eukaryotic chromosomes can be successfully cloned, maintained, and manipulated in yeast. These results highlight the improvement in assembly and maintenance afforded by including yeast replication origins in eukaryotic DNA with moderate G + C content (48%). They also highlight the increased efficiency of assembly that can be achieved by purifying fragments before assembly.


Synthetic biology can be described as the iterative process of modeling biological phenomena, building genetic devices to implement these models, and evaluating device performance. This discipline practiced at the scale of entire chromosomes can be defined as synthetic genomics. Synthetic genomic approaches focus on understanding function and regulation of multi-gene pathways, function of chromosome architecture, and strategies for multi-locus engineering. Several recent examples of synthetic genomic approaches include the creation of a bacterial cell from a chemically-synthesized genome [1], the cloning and manipulation of entire bacterial chromosomes in Bacillus subtilis[2, 3], and efforts to synthesize and shuffle yeast chromosomes [46].

We have previously used the synthetic genomic approach with prokaryotic genomes which are typically small, circular, and contained on a single molecule. These qualities allow for efficient maintenance and manipulation of the chromosome in yeast [710]. Once maintained in yeast, chromosomes can be efficiently manipulated before reintroduction into the host. Expanding synthetic genomic techniques to other bacteria is an active research area, but may also be useful for eukaryotic organisms. Chromosomes from eukaryotic organelles have been synthesized or assembled in yeast including the mitochondrion [11] and the chloroplast [12], but to our knowledge, no entire eukaryotic nuclear chromosome has been cloned in yeast.

Large regions of eukaryotic chromosomes have been cloned in yeast. Human (41% G + C) and mouse (42% G + C) YAC libraries have been made with average insert sizes of 620 kb and 700 kb, respectively [13], and human YAC clones greater than 1 Mb have been reported [14, 15]. Small DNA fragments from diverse eukaryotes can function as yeast replication origins including Neurospora crassa (49% G + C), Dictyostelium discoideum (22% G + C), Caenorhabditis elegans (35% G + C), Drosophila melanogaster (42% G + C), and Zea mays (47% G + C) [16]. Addition of yeast origins of replication was previously shown to improve maintenance of large regions of prokaryotic DNA, especially when the sequence has a higher average G + C content than yeast [17]. DNA with low G + C content will have a greater chance of having A + T-rich sites that function as yeast replication origins while DNA of higher average G + C content will have statistically fewer of these sites (Table 1). Given that some sequences from diverse eukaryotes can function as yeast replication origins, we sought to test whether adding additional yeast replication origins could improve maintenance of entire eukaryotic chromosomes from non-fungal species.

Table 1 11-base yeast ARS consensus sequence

To demonstrate the ability of yeast to maintain entire eukaryotic chromosomes, we investigated the yeast-based assembly of chromosomes from the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. This marine diatom has a total genome size of 27.4 Mb and a G + C content of 48%. After the completely closed genomes of Ostreococcus lucimarinus[18] and Cyanidioschyzon merolae[19], P. tricornutum has one of the best-assembled algal genomes with 33 chromosome-sized scaffolds including 12 with telomere-to-telomere coverage [20]. Additionally, some of the telomere-to-telomere scaffolds are relatively small (<600-kb), making them good targets for developing synthetic genomic approaches. Experiments with the P. tricornutum system benefit from efficient transformation methods [21] and a long history of physiological research [22]. Because P. tricornutum is an emerging model genetic system for marine microalgal biology and biotechnology [23], we chose it to develop the first stage of a synthetic genomic approach: cloning, maintaining, and manipulating chromosomes in yeast. In this paper, we present data on the prospects and limitations associated with assembling, maintaining and manipulating P. tricornutum chromosomes in yeast and demonstrate improvements on the yeast assembly process including gel purification by electroelution as a powerful way to concentrate large DNA fragments for assembly.


The 27.4 Mb P. tricornutum nuclear genome currently exists as 33 individual scaffolds. These scaffolds are described as chromosomes in reports on the genome sequence [20], although ongoing work to completely close the genome sequence may collapse some of these scaffolds without telomere-to-telomere coverage into single chromosomes. To be consistent with published work describing the genome, we refer to these scaffolds as “chromosomes”. We chose P. tricornutum chromosomes 25 and 26 (lengths of 497 kb and 441 kb, respectively) as targets to assemble entire eukaryotic chromosomes in yeast because they are the smallest chromosomes for which telomere-to-telomere assembly exists. Chromosomes 25 and 26 each have a single remaining sequencing gap predicted to be 3.7 kb and 17 kb on chromosomes 25 and 26, respectively.

Cloning fragments spanning chromosomes

To clone an entire eukaryotic chromosome in yeast, we used an assembly-based strategy in which the chromosome was first cloned as smaller fragments in yeast and then assembled into the full-length molecule. Previous results cloning large DNA fragments from bacteria with moderately high G + C content (55%) indicated that fragments greater than ca. 150 kb were optimally maintained after addition of a yeast replication origin sequence [17]. With the large bacterial fragments, we demonstrated that adding additional yeast replication origins to the DNA allowed for stable maintenance of a ca. 450-kb fragment in yeast. Eukaryotic DNA fragments from sources such as human (41% G + C) and mouse (42% G + C) have been cloned in YACs that exceed 1 Mb, and we sought to test whether P. tricornutum DNA fragments (48% G + C) larger than ca. 150 kb could be replicated efficiently in yeast because of the higher G + C content.

To test whether additional yeast replication origins would improve the maintenance of larger P. tricornutum DNA, we first cloned chromosomes 25 and 26 each as five smaller ca. 100-kb fragments. Breaking the chromosome into smaller pieces allowed us to test for toxicity of any genes that may happen to be expressed in yeast and allowed us to further modify the pieces to test whether adding additional yeast origins of replication improved assembly efficiency in yeast.

We cloned the five, large, overlapping fragments that compose a chromosome using a yeast-based method called Transformation-Associated Recombination (TAR) cloning [2426]. In TAR cloning, a yeast vector containing sequence overlaps with a specific target sequence is co-transformed with genomic DNA containing the target sequence. Yeast performs specific recombination events to recombine the target sequence into the plasmid. The efficiency of this process is greatly improved if the target sequence is linearized near at least one of the sites of recombination. We took advantage of rare-cutting restriction sites present in the P. tricornutum chromosomes to design our cloning strategy which would allow us to create double-stranded breaks near at least one of the homologous recombination sites. Digestion sites were selected such that each of the five chromosomal fragments overlapped by 10–40 kb (Table 2, Additional file 1: Figure S1). To clone each fragment, P. tricornutum DNA was prepared in agarose plugs to prevent unwanted shearing, and plugs were digested with the appropriate enzyme(s) to yield long DNA fragments (Additional file 1: Figure S1). To clone the P. tricornutum chromosome fragments, we designed vectors which had two 200-bp homology regions specific for each fragment. Cloned fragments were selected by the HIS3 marker on the vector, and, because our vector design required two recombination events resulting in elimination of the URA3 marker from the vector, empty vector molecules could be eliminated by selecting for the absence of the URA3 maker using 5-fluoroorotic acid (5FOA, see Methods) [27].

Table 2 P. tricornutum fragments used for assembly of chromosomes 25 and 26

Resulting yeast colonies were screened by PCR using primers designed to amplify specific, small, unique regions (less than 1 kb) located approximately in the middle of each fragment. Clones verified as correct by PCR were purified from yeast and transformed into E. coli to obtain higher plasmid yields. The large, cloned, ~100 kb fragments were then separated as supercoiled plasmids on an agarose gel to estimate their size. All fragments from chromosome 25 yielded bands of the expected size (Figure 1 and Table 2). Fragments from chromosome 26 were also of the expected size with the exception of fragments 26–1 and 26–2. For fragment 26–1, we expected a fragment of size 88 kb (including vector sequence) but obtained fragments of around 130 kb (Figure 1). For fragment 26–2, we expected a fragment at around 152 kb (including vector sequence), but we obtained plasmids of two different sizes: one was too small at around 100 kb and one that appeared too large at around 170 kb. Because we worried that the smaller-sized plasmids contained deletions, we chose the larger plasmid (see discussion for further explanation) to proceed with the assembly of chromosome 26.

Figure 1
figure 1

Cloning of P. tricornutum chromosomes as five overlapping fragments. A. Chromosomes 25 and 26 were each cloned as five overlapping fragments in yeast using a BAC-YAC vector. Fragments were further modified by addition of the URA3 selectable marker in fragment 3 (asterisk) and the addition of a yeast replication origin (ARS) in fragments 2, 3, and 4 (vertical bar). B and C. The cloned fragments were purified from yeast, transformed into E. coli, and were purified and separated on agarose gels as supercoiled plasmids. Chromosome 25 (B) and 26 (C) fragments were each in the following order: BAC-Tracker supercoiled DNA ladder (Epicentre, lane 1), Fragment 1 (lane 2), Fragment 2 (larger version ~ 170 kb, lane 3), Fragment 2-ARS (lane 4), Fragment 3-URA (lane 5), Fragment 3-URA-ARS (lane 6), Fragment 4 (lane 7), Fragment 4-ARS (lane 8), Fragment 5 (lane 9), BAC-Tracker ladder (lane 10).

After all fragments had been cloned in yeast and moved to E. coli, a single clone from each of the five fragments was chosen to move forward for assembly of the entire chromosome (Figure 1). To facilitate chromosome assembly and selection of correctly-assembled molecules in yeast, fragment 3 from each of chromosomes 25 and 26 was modified in yeast with an additional uracil selectable marker (URA3, Table 3). Each of fragments 2, 3, and 4 from chromosomes 25 and 26 was modified by addition of a yeast replication origin (also called an autonomously replicating sequence or ARS, Table 3). After modifications, plasmids were extracted and separated by agarose gel electrophoresis to verify that the correct plasmid size was maintained (Figure 1).

Table 3 Sites of insertion of yeast replication origins (KmR-ARS) and yeast selectable markers (URA) in cloned P. tricornutum fragments

To further validate the identity of the cloned fragments, we tested the plasmids containing the large P. tricornutum fragments using a higher resolution multiplex PCR. The multiplex primer set was designed to amplify a fragment every ~20 kb. All fragments in chromosome 25 had the expected high resolution multiplex PCR pattern with the exception of 25–3 that lacked one band where the primer binding site was interrupted by the URA3 insertion (Additional file 1: Figure S2) and a faint band present for 25–2 (MPX2, Additional file 1: Figure S2) that was likely the result of non-specific primer binding (see Additional file 1: Figure S2 for additional explanation). High resolution multiplex PCR was also performed after modification with the ARS regions (Additional file 1: Figure S2). Modification with the ARS regions did not alter the multiplex PCR pattern indicating that all regions of the chromosome were still present after modification.

For chromosome 26, fragments 26–1, 26–3, 26–4, and 26–5 had the expected high resolution multiplex bands PCR (Additional file 1: Figure S1). The larger than expected size of 26–1 may be explained by the sequencing gap found within this fragment. High resolution multiplex PCR with several larger 26–2 clones indicated that they were each lacking one of the multiplex bands near the 5’ end of the fragment (Additional file 1: Figure S1). We continued with these fragments because the multiplex PCR indicated that there was still sequence overlap between fragments 26–1 and 26–2. Of all the fragments cloned, 26–1 and 26–2 were the only fragments that yielded a discrepancy in either size or DNA content from what was predicted by the published genome sequence, and we discuss possibilities for these observed differences at the end of the paper.

Our cloning strategy involved capturing sequence immediately adjacent to the telomeric repeats found at the ends of fragments 25–1, 25–5, 26–1, and 26–5. To verify that the regions immediately inside of the telomeric regions were cloned, we amplified the vector-insert junctions of the 5’ region of fragments 25–1 and 26–1 and the 3’ region of fragments 25–5 and 26–5. When these amplicons were sequenced, the results confirmed that the junction was seamless between the subtelomeric region and the vector, and all telomeric repeats had been removed in the TAR-cloning process.

Assembly of fragments into chromosomes

To assemble whole chromosomes in yeast, plasmids carrying the ~100 kb P. tricornutum fragments (with or without added ARS insertion) were purified from E. coli and the cloned fragments were released from the cloning vector by restriction enzyme digestion. After digestion, P. tricornutum DNA fragments were separated from the vector sequence by agarose gel electrophoresis, and P. tricornutum fragments were electroeluted from the agarose gel. The five P. tricornutum fragments spanning an entire chromosome were then assembled into a new vector in yeast using spheroplast transformation in one of two experimental configurations. In the first, the five fragments lacked added yeast origins while in the second, fragments 2, 3, and 4 each contained an additional yeast origin. In both configurations, fragment 3 contained an additional URA3 gene to assist in selection of correct assemblies. Selectable markers on both the vector and fragment 3 complemented tryptophan and uracil auxotrophies, respectively, and improved selection for complete assemblies.

Resulting yeast colonies were patched several times on selective media. One hundred colonies of each assembly (i.e. with or without additional yeast replication origins) were screened by multiplex PCR in which one amplicon derived from each of the five assembled fragments. For both chromosomes 25 and 26, no complete assemblies were observed without the addition of yeast replication origins (Figure 2). In the chromosome 25 assembly with additional yeast origins of replication, 36% of the yeast colonies contained all five fragments (Figure 2). For the chromosome 26 assembly with added ARS regions, 62% of the clones contained all five fragments (Figure 2). The greatly improved efficiency of assembly using fragments that contain additional yeast origins confirms their utility for improving chromosome-scale assemblies with eukaryotic DNA (Figure 2). We also investigated the use of electroelution as a purification method for large DNA fragments. Results without gel purification of the fragments by electroelution yielded a lower percentage of correct colonies, and only 5 of 100 colonies in the chromosome 25 assembly had all five fragments.

Figure 2
figure 2

Summary of assembly efficiency for chromosomes 25 and 26. Assembly of each of P. tricornutum chromosomes 25 (A and B) and 26 (C and D) from five overlapping fragments was performed using yeast spheroplast transformation. Fragments to assemble were modified with the URA3 selectable marker in the third fragment only (A and C) or URA3 selectable marker in the third fragment and yeast origins of replication in fragments 2, 3, and 4 (B and D). One hundred resulting colonies were screened by low resolution multiplex PCR (one amplicon per fragment), and the number of fragments cloned for each assembly was plotted.

Assembled chromosomes that were positive by PCR for all five fragments were further analyzed by high resolution multiplex PCR. In this analysis, primers were designed to amplify a band every 20 kb. The results from the high resolution multiplex PCR indicated that all regions present in the original five fragments were successfully assembled into a final molecule (Additional file 1: Figure S3). Assembled chromosome plasmids with correct multiplex PCR profiles were transformed to E. coli and retested with high resolution multiplex PCR to confirm that the entire plasmid was transferred.

The size of the assembled chromosomes was then analyzed by pulsed field gel electrophoresis. The assembled circular P. tricornutum chromosomes were prepared from E. coli in agarose plugs to prevent shearing the large circular plasmids and were separated by pulsed field gel electrophoresis (Figure 3). DNA preparations from E. coli cells containing chromosome 25 yielded a single band at a size consistent with the expected size of the cloned chromosome 25 (513 kb including vector and other added sequence). Preparations from E. coli cells containing chromosome 26 also contained a single band at ca. 500 kb. This observed size was slightly larger than expected (457 kb including vector and other added sequence), but the larger observed size of the assembled molecule is consistent with the larger than expected size of fragments 26–1 and 26–2 (Figure 1).

Figure 3
figure 3

Final assemblies of P. tricornutum chromosomes . Assembled chromosomes that tested positive by high resolution multiplex PCR were transferred to E. coli and supercoiled plasmids were purified in agarose plugs. DNA purified in plugs from E. coli containing assembled chromosome 25 (A) or 26 (B) was separated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

Manipulation of chromosome fragments in yeast

One of the strengths of the synthetic genomic approach outlined above is the ability to manipulate target organism DNA using efficient yeast and E. coli genetic techniques. To demonstrate how this might be applied to the cloned P. tricornutum DNA, we used a mutational strategy to progressively shorten fragment 26–3. As shown in Figure 4A, a URA3 cassette was PCR amplified to have 40-bp homology on the 5’ end to a position in the cloning vector and at the 3’ end of the URA3 to part of the cloned 26–3 P. tricornutum fragment. This fragment was then transformed into yeast carrying the 26–3 plasmid to homologously recombine and replace native sequence with the URA3 marker. Deletions from 20–100 kb were constructed using this method (Figure 4B). The deletions constructed using this method are not limited to extending from the vector as shown in Figure 4, but can be made anywhere in the fragment. Serial mutations can be easily made using techniques to recycle the URA3 marker [28]. Once a URA3 cassette is inserted, replacement of the URA-marked deleted region with a sequence of interest can be easily selected by plating the transformant on media containing 5-FOA [27]. After the fragments are modified as desired, they can be reassembled into entire chromosomes as described above.

Figure 4
figure 4

Progressive minimization of P. tricornutum fragment 26–3 using yeast homologous recombination. A. Diagram of the deletion strategy. To generate reduced versions of fragment 26–3, we inserted yeast deletion cassettes (which had 40-bp homology at the 5’ end (F) common for all deletions, 40-bp homology at the 3’ end specific for each fragment (RX where X represents homology sites 1–9), and a URA3 marker). These cassettes were PCR amplified, and yeast transformation was performed using the lithium acetate method (Step 1). Homologous recombination between the deletion cassettes and fragment 26–3 would produce desired fragments (Step 2). URA3 (yellow box), Yeast vector (orange box), P. tricornutum DNA representing fragment 26–3 (blue box and blue dotted line). B. After creation of the deletion in yeast, the plasmids were transferred to E. coli and purified. Supercoiled plasmids were separated by gel electrophoresis in the following order: BAC-Tracker ladder (lane 1), unmodified fragment 26–3 (lane 2), deletion of fragment 26–3 into 100 kb (lane 3), 90 kb (lane 4), 80 kb (lane 5), 70 kb (lane 6), 60 kb (lane 7), 50 kb (lane 8), 40 kb (lane 9), 30 kb (lane 10), 20 kb (lane 11).


In this work, we found that the efficiency of yeast-based assembly of entire P. tricornutum chromosomes was improved by adding yeast replication origins to the large fragments before assembly. Although similarly large fragments of eukaryotic DNA have been cloned as YACs in various genome projects, the increased efficiency of assembly and maintenance afforded by adding yeast replication origins may have been related to the 10% higher G + C content of P. tricornutum relative to yeast (48% vs. 38% G + C, respectively) (Table 1). Although sequences found in Zea mays (47% G + C and similar to P. tricornutum) function as yeast origins [16], our finding may highlight the importance of variation from the mean G + C content as well as the mean value itself in predicting whether additional yeast replication origins may improve assembly and maintenance in yeast. For example, while the human genome has an average G + C content of 41%, many small regions were found with G + C contents that vary from 33% to 55% [29], and large YACs spanning hundreds of kilobases of human DNA have been maintained in yeast. Thus, mean G + C content may not be as important as the frequency of deviation from the mean in understanding how well DNA of a particular organism will be maintained in yeast. If frequent regions of low G + C content are found, then large DNA fragments may be more efficiently cloned without addition of yeast origins.

This paper describes an improved chromosome assembly process that uses electroelution to concentrate and purify large DNA fragments to increase the efficiency of assembly. Electroelution has been used extensively to select for large inserts in BAC library construction [3033]. Initial attempts to assemble the P. tricornutum DNA fragments used a “digest and mix” strategy. In this initial method, plasmids were digested to release the P. tricornutum fragments from the cloning vector, and the five fragments were subsequently mixed together with a new cloning vector without any purification or removal of old cloning vectors. We found that this method yielded very few colonies of which only a small percentage were correct. In this study, we describe purification of the large, digested DNA fragments by electroelution from agarose gels before assembly in yeast. This modification improved the rate of successful assembly. For electroelution, we used RECO chips (Takara). These small disposable devices consist of a chamber with permeable fabric on one side and impermeable dialysis membrane on the other side. The chip is inserted into an agarose gel after bands of interest have been separated and the DNA of interest is electrophoresed into the chip chamber. The DNA is eluted by a quick low speed centrifugation step. Although the RECO chip product is currently discontinued by the manufacturer, other electroelution techniques should suffice as they have been used successfully in the construction of large BAC libraries [31].

Assembly of chromosome 25 matched the expected size and multiplex PCR profile, and our final assembly of chromosome 26 differed from the expected size and PCR profile based on the published genome sequence. The differences between the expected size and multiplex PCR profiles were likely due to the larger-than-expected sizes of fragments 26–1 and 26–2. In the end, the assembled whole chromosome 26 was consistent with the starting component fragments indicating that the assembly process itself was robust for the P. tricornutum DNA. To better understand the differences between chromosomes 25 and 26, we searched for repeated regions in each chromosome using BLAST. The results showed that chromosome 25 had very little repeated DNA while chromosome 26 had a region containing several repeats. These repeats are present in a 30-kb region at the 5’ end of fragment 26–2 and contained at least 4 direct repeats each 2–4 kb in length (Additional file 1: Table S1). It is possible that during the process of cloning fragment 26–2 in yeast, different rearrangements occurred resulting in cloned regions of different sizes. However, we also cannot rule out the possibility that the different-sized fragments reflect natural diversity in this region in our P. tricornutum cell population. Because the P. tricornutum cultures are largely maintained by serial passage for long periods of time, populations of cells within the culture with different genetic characteristics may have resulted. We did not find repeat regions in fragment 26–1; however, the larger than expected size for fragment 26–1 may be explained by a gap in sequence at the 5’end of this fragment. This gap is estimated to be approximately 17 kb; however, it is possible that it is larger than 17 kb which would explain the size of fragment 26–1 which we have cloned.

Despite the differences between our assembled chromosome 26 and the expected version based on the genome sequence, our data support the fact that using the assembly techniques described in this paper we are able to accurately and efficiently assemble the pieces we had cloned. To avoid potential difficulties, future attempts to assemble eukaryotic chromosomes should perform a BLAST search to identify repeated sequences. Such a search can be easily implemented and visualized in the NCBI Genome Workbench software. If repeats are identified, attempts should be made to design a fragment cloning strategy that places the repeated sequences in the middle of the fragment and not at the junctions between two fragments as in fragment 26–2.


Using P. tricornutum as our model eukaryote, we have demonstrated a technique for assembly, maintenance, and manipulation of entire eukaryotic chromosomes in yeast. We show that addition of yeast replication origins has improved assembly and maintenance of two eukaryotic chromosomes with moderate G + C content (47%) and that this is likely to translate to other eukaryotic DNA fragments. Because many other algae have high G + C content including the model green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardii (G + C content 64%)[34], application of these techniques may improve genome scale cloning in a variety of organisms. Given the challenges of slow growth and limited genetic tools in a variety of algal species of interest, developing synthetic genomic approaches may improve genetic characterization of these species.


Strains, media, and growth conditions

For all yeast transformations, we used Saccharomyces cerevisiae VL6-48 (ATCC MYA-3666: MATα his3-Δ200 trp1-Δ1 ura3-52 lys2 ade2-1 met14 cir0). Yeast cells were grown in rich medium (YEPD) or complete minimal (CM) medium lacking histidine and uracil or tryptophan and uracil (Teknova) at 30°C. Escherichia coli (Epi300, Epicentre) strains were grown on Luria broth or agar supplemented with chloramphenicol (20 mg L-1) or kanamycin (50 mg L-1) as needed. Pheodactylum tricornutum was grown in L1 medium [35] at 18°C under cool white fluorescent lights (50 μE m-2 s-1). Sequence information for P. tricornutum was taken from the DOE genome sequencing site [36] as described [20].

Preparation of agarose-embedded DNA

DNA from P. tricornutum for TAR cloning of the ~100-kb fragments was isolated in agarose plugs using the Bio-Rad CHEF Genomic DNA Plug Kit with a protocol that was adapted for use with P. tricornutum. To prepare the plugs, 50 ml of mid-log phase (108 cells ml-1) P. tricornutum culture was centrifuged at 1500 × g for 5 min at 10°C. Cells were washed once with 50 ml of 1 M sorbitol and were resuspended in 2 mL of SPEM solution (1 M sorbitol, 10 mM EDTA pH 7.5, Na2HPO4 · 7H2O (2.08 g L-1), NaH2PO4 · 1H2O (0.32 g L-1)). The cell suspension was incubated for 5 min at 37°C and mixed with an equal volume of 2.0% low-melting-point agarose in 1 × TAE buffer (40 mM Tris, 20 mM acetic acid and 1 mM EDTA) which was equilibrated at 50°C. Aliquots of 100 μl were transferred into plug molds (Bio-Rad, catalog # 170–3713) and allowed to solidify for 10 min at 4°C. Next plugs were removed from the molds into 50 ml conical tube containing 5 ml of protoplasting solution (4.56 mL of SPEM solution, 200 μl Zymolyase-100 T solution (50 mg ml -1 dissolved in H2O), 200 μl lysozyme (25 mg ml-1), 40 μl β-Mercaptoethanol and incubated for 1 h at 37°C. Next, plugs were washed with 25 ml of wash buffer (20 mM Tris, 50 mM EDTA, pH 8.0), and then incubated in 5 ml in Proteinase K buffer (100 mM EDTA (pH 8.0), 0.2% sodium deoxycholate, and 1% sodium lauryl sarcosine, 1 mg ml-1 Proteinase K) for 24 hr at 50°C. After proteinase K treatment, plugs were washed according to the Bio-Rad CHEF-Dr III manual.

Construction of cloning vectors used in this study

Vectors used for cloning and assembly of the ~100 kb fragments and entire P. tricornutum chromosomes were constructed from the template plasmids pBK-RBYV-HIS3URA3 and pBK-RBYV-TRP1URA3 using yeast assembly methods [17, 37]. Maps and sequences for both vectors are available in the Supplementary Information. Both vectors contained the URA3 gene from pYAC-RC (ATCC 37610). For the vector pBK-RBYV-HIS3URA3, the BACYAC backbone pCC1BACHIS3 was used containing the HIS3 gene [17]. For pBK-RBYV-TRP1URA3, the HIS3 gene was replaced with the TRP1 gene from pRS314 (GenBank Accession U03440). Both pBK-RBYV-HIS3URA3 and pBK-RBYV-TRP1URA3 contain the ShBle cassette from pAF6 [38] and the conjugative transfer origin (OriT) from pRL2948a (C. P. Wolk, unpublished data). Both vectors were designed to have I-CeuI and XhoI restriction sites at the junction between OriT and URA3, and at the junction of the URA3 and pCC1BAC backbone, XhoI and I-SceI sites were inserted.

Specific vectors for cloning each of the ~100 kb P. tricornutum DNA fragments by TAR cloning were assembled in yeast by co-transforming XhoI-digested template plasmids pBK-RBYV-HIS3URA3 and two 200-bp PCR-amplified P. tricornutum DNA homology regions. The vector pKB-RBYV-HIS3URA3 was designed so that digestion with XhoI would excise the URA3 cassette. Our strategy to create 200-bp homology regions on either side of the URA3 cassette was to reassemble the two pieces of the digested template vector with the 200-bp homology regions inserted on either side of the URA3 cassette. Each of the 200-bp P. tricornutum PCR fragments contained 25–40 bp homologies to the template vector (pBK-RBYV-HIS3URA3) on either side of an XhoI site. The resulting plasmid contained the URA3 cassette cloned between two 200-bp P. tricornutum homology regions that specified the boundaries of the resulting TAR-cloned fragment, and the pBK-RBYV-HIS3 backbone. Primers used to amplify each of the 200-bp P. tricornutum homology regions are listed in Additional file 1: Table S4.

The design of the primers used to amplify the 200-bp homology regions was such that after assembly only one of the XhoI sites would be restored and the second XhoI site would be replaced with a PacI site. Digestion with either XhoI or PacI would allow the vector to be linearized while maintaining the URA3 marker which could be used as negative selection to select for double recombination events in which both homology regions had recombined with their target regions in the P. tricornutum chromosome. Alternatively each vector could be digested with both XhoI and PacI to remove URA3 marker before TAR-cloning. We used both approaches in this paper and found that the highest cloning efficiency of target genomic fragments that were cut only on one side (e.g. fragment 25–1) was obtained using vector that had been cut at both ends to release URA3, and therefore the negative selection could not be applied. For increased yield, vectors verified by PCR as correctly assembled were moved from yeast to E.coli and were purified by alkaline lysis before being digested with XhoI and/or PacI [39].

Vectors for assembling entire chromosomes 25 and 26 were constructed in yeast by co-transforming XhoI-digested template pBK-RBYV-TRP1URA3 and two 500-bp PCR amplified homology regions. The first homology region matched the 5’ region of the cloned P. tricornutum sequence in fragments 25–1 or 26–1. The second homology region matched the 3’ region of the cloned P. tricornutum sequence in pieces 25–5 or 26–5. The first homology region had 35 bp overlap with the template vector at the XhoI site near the OriT region, and the second 500 bp region had 35 bp overlap at the XhoI site near the pCC1BAC sequence. In addition, the 3’ end of homology region one contained 35 bp overlap with 5’ end of homology region two so that the two pieces could be assembled together in a vector. The design of the primers used to amplify the homologous regions was such that after assembly an XhoI site would be created at the junction of homology region one and two. This allowed for digestion of the resulting vector with XhoI to linearize and expose the two homology regions before assembly of the entire chromosome. For chromosome 25, the first 500-bp homology region was amplified by primers Pt25-AV15-1 and Pt25-AV15-2new and the second homology region was amplified using primers Pt25-AV15-3new and PT25-AV15-4. For chromosome 26, the first 500-bp homology region was amplified by primers Pt26-av-15-F1 and Pt26-av-15-R1 and the second region was amplified by primers Pt26-av-15-F2 and Pt-av-15-R2 (See supplementary information).

TAR-cloning 100-kb fragments and assembly of full length chromosomes

P. tricornutum DNA for TAR cloning was prepared in agarose plugs as described above and in-plug digestion was performed as previously described [17] using specific enzymes listed in Table 2. After digestion, plugs were washed in TE buffer (pH 8) and were melted in 100 μl TE buffer at 65°C for 10 min. The molten agarose was then equilibrated at 42°C and 2 μl of β-agarase (NEB) was added and incubated for 8 h. 10 μl of DNA from plugs, (typically 100 ng/μl ) was mixed with 300–500 ng of vector and the assembly was performed by mixing the DNA with yeast spheroplasts prepared as previously described [17, 37]. Resulting colonies were screened by PCR using primers specific to a region in the cloned piece (see multiplex primers below). Fragments 25–1, 25–5, 26–1, and 26–5 were further screened by PCR to verify that the proper sub-telomeric region was cloned using the following primer pairs, respectively: Endchk-F + Pt25-1endchk-R, Endchk-R + Pt25-5endchk-F2, Endchk-F + Pt26-1endchk-R, Endchk-R + Pt26-5endchk-F2 (See Additional file 1: Table S4). Plasmids from positive clones were isolated by alkaline lysis and transformed into E. coli for further analysis and confirmation of size by separation with agarose gel electrophoresis.

To assemble entire P. tricornutum chromosomes, plasmids containing the cloned fragments were purified from E. coli using an alkaline lysis procedure [39]. Each of the five fragments (20–30 μg plasmid) composing either chromosome 25 or 26 was excised from the cloning vector by digest with I-SceI and I-CeuI for 8 h at 37°C in a total volume of 50 μl. These excised fragments were either precipitated and used directly for assembly or subjected to gel purification and electroelution. For gel purification, the entire 50 μl digest was loaded on a 1% agarose gel in 1X Tris-Acetate-EDTA (TAE) buffer and was separated by electrophoresis for 8 h at 80 V at 4°C. The gel was then stained briefly with ethidium bromide, and the excised fragments were each separated from genomic DNA and vector by electroelution using RECO chips (Takara). To capture the large DNA fragments in the chips, the gel was rotated 90° and a RECO chip was inserted into the gel so that the large P. tricornutum DNA fragments would electrophorese into the chip for 1 h at 100 V at room temperature. DNA was eluted from the chip by a centrifugation for 10 sec (1,500 × g), and final concentrations of DNA were typically between 20–30 μg μl-1.

Digested fragments were mixed with 500–1000 ng of vector and transformed into yeast spheroplasts as previously described [37]. Typically, 3–5 μg of each fragment was used for assemblies of fragments without electroelution and 100–500 ng of each fragment was used for electroeluted samples. Resulting yeast colonies were screened by colony PCR using a multiplex primer set containing one amplicon on each assembled fragment using the Multiplex PCR Kit (Qiagen). Primers used for multiplex PCR can be found in Additional file 1: Table S4 and are listed as “low resolution multiplex PCR”. Plasmids from clones positive for all five amplicons were isolated by alkaline lysis and transformed into E. coli strain Epi300. Further analysis of the clones was performed on plasmids isolated from E. coli including high resolution multiplex PCR and CHEF gel analysis on the whole assembled chromosomes. High resolution multiplex PCR consisted of amplicons designed every ~20 kb along the chromosome. Primers for this can be found in Additional file 1: Table S4 and were pooled according to Additional file 1: Table S3. The reactions were performed using the Qiagen Multiplex PCR kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Amplicons were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis using 2% agarose gels made with 1X TAE. CHEF gel analysis of assembled P. tricornutum chromosomes was performed as previously described for other cloned large plasmids [17]. Briefly, assembled P. tricornutum chromosomes propagated in E. coli were isolated in agarose plugs using the CHEF Genomic DNA Plug Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Manipulation of fragments

Yeast replication origins were inserted at defined locations in fragments 2, 3, and 4 of chromosomes 25 and 26 (Additional file 1: Table S2). The ARSH3 sequence from yeast was fused to a sequence encoding the kanamycin antibiotic resistance marker from pACYC177 and recombined into the cloned P. tricornutum fragments using lambda red recombineering as previously described [17]. The KanR-ARS fragment was amplified by PCR using primers described in Additional file 1: Table S2. Positive colonies were screened by PCR using primers flanking the insertion site and the increase in amplicon size based on insertion of the KanR-ARS fragment indicated a correctly-recombined clone (Additional file 1: Table S2). Positive clones were purified, confirmed to have the correct size by agarose gel electrophoresis and used in assembly reactions.

The strategy to modify the fragments in yeast was based on insertion of the URA3 gene using homologous recombination. This strategy was used to insert the URA3 gene in the middle of fragments 25–3 and 26–3 to assist in proper assembly, as well as to shorten fragment 26–3 to make a series of deletions. The URA3 gene with appropriate homology regions was amplified from pYAC-RC vector (ATCC 37610). For the insertions into fragment 25–3 using primers URApt25-3_F + URApt25-3_R, and into fragment 26–3 using primers URApt26-3_F + URApt26-3_R (See Additional file 1: Table S2). For deletions in fragment 26–3, the URA3 gene was amplified using a common forward primer for each insertion and a unique reverse primer that specified the insertion site and the degree of deletion created (e.g. URA-F + URA-R100, etc., see Additional file 1: Table S4). The amplified URA3 cassettes were transformed into yeast carrying Fragment 25–3 or 26–3 using lithium acetate transformation [40]. Yeast colonies were selected on media lacking histidine and uracil, and correct clones were identified by PCR at either side of the URA3 insertion junction. The junction at the 5’ end of the insertion (i.e. the “left” side) was common to all plasmids generated in the deletion series and was screened using the primers F-left + R-left). The junction at the 3’ end of the URA3 insertion (i.e. the “right” side) was screened using a common forward primer (F-right) and a primer that denoted the final size of the resulting plasmid (100-R-right, etc., See Additional file 1: Table S4). Fragments identified as having the correct insertion by PCR were moved from yeast to E.coli and plasmids were purified and further tested by agarose gel electrophoresis to verify correct plasmid size.



Bacterial artificial chromosome-yeast artificial chromosome


Transformation-associated recombination.


  1. Gibson DG, Glass JI, Lartigue C, Noskov VN, Chuang R-Y, Algire MA, Benders GA, Montague MG, Ma L, Moodie MM, Merryman C, Vashee S, Krishnakumar R, Assad-Garcia N, Andrews-Pfannkoch C, Denisova EA, Young L, Qi Z-Q, Segall-Shapiro TH, Calvey CH, Parmar PP, Hutchison CA, Smith HO, Venter JC: Creation of a bacterial cell controlled by a chemically synthesized genome. Science 2010, 329: 52-56. 10.1126/science.1190719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Watanabe S, Shiwa Y, Itaya M, Yoshikawa H: Complete Sequence of the First Chimera Genome Constructed by Cloning the Whole Genome of Synechocystis Strain PCC6803 into the Bacillus subtilis 168 Genome. J Bacteriol 2012, 194: 7007. 10.1128/JB.01798-12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Itaya M, Tsuge K, Koizumi M, Fujita K: Combining two genomes in one cell: Stable cloning of the Synechocystis PCC6803 genome in the Bacillus subtilis 168 genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005, 102: 15971-15976. 10.1073/pnas.0503868102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Muller H, Annaluru N, Schwerzman J, Richardson S, Dymond J, Cooper E, Bader J, Boeke J, Chandrasegaran S: Assembling large DNA segments in yeast. Methods Mol Biol 2012, 852: 133-150. 10.1007/978-1-61779-564-0_11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dymond J, Boeke J: The Saccharomyces cerevisiae SCRaMbLE system and genome minimization. Bioeng Bugs 2012, 3: 168-171.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dymond JS, Richardson SM, Coombes CE, Babatz T, Muller H, Annaluru N, Blake WJ, Schwerzmann JW, Dai J, Lindstrom DL, Boeke AC, Gottschling DE, Chandrasegaran S, Bader JS, Boeke JD: Synthetic chromosome arms function in yeast and generate phenotypic diversity by design. Nature 2011, 477: 471-476. 10.1038/nature10403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tagwerker C, Dupont CL, Karas BJ, Ma L, Chuang R-Y, Benders G a, Ramon A, Novotny M, Montague MG, Venepally P, Brami D, Schwartz A, Andrews-Pfannkoch C, Gibson DG, Glass JI, Smith HO, Venter JC, Hutchison C a: Sequence analysis of a complete 1.66 Mb Prochlorococcus marinus MED4 genome cloned in yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 2012, 40: 10375-10383. 10.1093/nar/gks823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Karas B, Jablanovic J, Sun L, Stam J, Ma L, Ramon A, Venter J, Weyman P, Gibson D, Glass , JI Hutchison C III, Smith H, Suzuki Y: Direct transfer of whole genomes from bacteria to yeast. Nat Meth 2013, 10: 410-412. 10.1038/nmeth.2433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Benders GA, Noskov VN, Denisova EA, Lartigue C, Gibson DG, Assad-Garcia N, Chuang R-Y, Carrera W, Moodie M, Algire MA, Phan Q, Alperovich N, Vashee S, Merryman C, Venter JC, Smith HO, Glass JI, Hutchison CA: Cloning whole bacterial genomes in yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 38: 2558-2569. 10.1093/nar/gkq119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Karas BJ, Tagwerker C, Yonemoto I, Hutchison CA III, Smith HO: Cloning the Acholeplasma laidlawii PG-8A Genome in Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a Yeast Centromeric Plasmid. ACS Synth Biol 2012, 1: 22-28. 10.1021/sb200013j

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gibson DG, Smith HO, Hutchison CA, Venter JC, Merryman C: Chemical synthesis of the mouse mitochondrial genome. Nat Meth 2010, 7: 901-903. 10.1038/nmeth.1515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. O’Neill BM, Mikkelson KL, Gutierrez NM, Cunningham JL, Wolff KL, Szyjka SJ, Yohn CB, Redding KE, Mendez MJ: An exogenous chloroplast genome for complex sequence manipulation in algae. Nucleic Acids Res 2012, 40: 2782-2792. 10.1093/nar/gkr1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Larin Z, Monaco AP, Lehrach H: Yeast artificial chromosome libraries containing large inserts from mouse and human DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991, 88: 4123-4127. 10.1073/pnas.88.10.4123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Albertsen HM, Abderrahim H, Cann HM, Dausset J, Le Paslier D, Cohen D: Construction and characterization of a yeast artificial chromosome library containing seven haploid human genome equivalents. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990, 87: 4256-4260. 10.1073/pnas.87.11.4256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Marschall P, Malik N, Larin Z: Transfer of YACs up to 2.3 Mb intact into human cells with polyethylenimine. Gene Ther 1999, 6: 1634-1637. 10.1038/

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Stinchcomb DT, Thomas M, Kelly J, Selker E, Davis RW: Eukaryotic DNA segments capable of autonomous replication in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1980, 77: 4559-4563. 10.1073/pnas.77.8.4559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Noskov VN, Karas BJ, Young L, Chung R-Y, Gibson DG, Lin Y-C, Stam J, Yonemoto IT, Suzuki Y, Pfannkoch C, Glass JI, Smith HO, CAH III, Venter JC, Weyman PD: Assembly of large, high G + C bacterial DNA fragments in yeast. ACS Synth Biol 2012, 1: 267-273. 10.1021/sb3000194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Palenik B, Grimwood J, Aerts A, Rouzé P, Salamov A, Putnam N, Dupont C, Jorgensen R, Derelle E, Rombauts S, Zhou K, Otillar R, Merchant SS, Podell S, Gaasterland T, Napoli C, Gendler K, Manuell A, Tai V, Vallon O, Piganeau G, Jancek S, Heijde M, Jabbari K, Bowler C, Lohr M, Robbens S, Werner G, Dubchak I, Pazour GJ, et al.: The tiny eukaryote Ostreococcus provides genomic insights into the paradox of plankton speciation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007, 104: 7705-7710. 10.1073/pnas.0611046104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Maruyama S, Matsuzaki M, Kuroiwa H, Miyagishima S-Y, Tanaka K, Kuroiwa T, Nozaki H: Centromere structures highlighted by the 100%-complete Cyanidioschyzon merolae genome. Plant Signal Behav 2008, 3: 140-141. 10.4161/psb.3.2.5066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bowler C, Allen AE, Badger JH, Grimwood J, Jabbari K, Kuo A, Maheswari U, Martens C, Maumus F, Otillar RP, Rayko E, Salamov A, Vandepoele K, Beszteri B, Gruber A, Heijde M, Katinka M, Mock T, Valentin K, Verret F, Berges J a, Brownlee C, Cadoret J-P, Chiovitti A, Choi CJ, Coesel S, De Martino A, Detter JC, Durkin C, Falciatore A, et al.: The Phaeodactylum genome reveals the evolutionary history of diatom genomes. Nature 2008, 456: 239-244. 10.1038/nature07410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Apt KE, Kroth-Pancic PG, Grossman AR: Stable nuclear transformation of the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Mol Gen Genet 1996, 252: 572-579.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Valenzuela J, Mazurie A, Carlson RP, Gerlach R, Cooksey KE, Peyton BM, Fields MW: Potential role of multiple carbon fixation pathways during lipid accumulation in Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Biotechnol Biofuels 2012, 5: 40. 10.1186/1754-6834-5-40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bozarth A, Maier U-G, Zauner S: Diatoms in biotechnology: modern tools and applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2009, 82: 195-201. 10.1007/s00253-008-1804-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kouprina N, Noskov V, Koriabine M, Leem S-H, Larionov V: Exploring transformation-associated recombination cloning for selective isolation of genomic regions. Methods Mol Biol 2004, 255: 69-90.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Larionov V, Kouprina N, Graves J, Chen XN, Korenberg JR, Resnick MA: Specific cloning of human DNA as yeast artificial chromosomes by transformation-associated recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996, 93: 491-496. 10.1073/pnas.93.1.491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kouprina N, Larionov V: TAR cloning: insights into gene function, long-range haplotypes and genome structure and evolution. Nat Rev Genet 2006, 7: 805-812. 10.1038/nrg1943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Boeke J, Croute F, Fink G: A positive selection for mutants lacking orotidine-5’-phosphate decarboxylase activity in yeast: 5-fluoro-orotic acid resistance. Mol Gen Genet 1984, 197: 345-346. 10.1007/BF00330984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Noskov VN, Segall-Shapiro TH, Chuang R-Y: Tandem repeat coupled with endonuclease cleavage (TREC): a seamless modification tool for genome engineering in yeast. Nucl Acids Res 2010, 38: 2570-2576. 10.1093/nar/gkq099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cohen N, Dagan T, Stone L, Graur D: GC composition of the human genome: in search of isochores. Mol Biol Evol 2005, 22: 1260-1272. 10.1093/molbev/msi115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gangalum RK, Jing Z, Nagaoka Y, Jiang M, Bhat SP: Purification of BAC DNA for high-efficiency transgenesis. Biotechniques 2011, 51: 335-336. 338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Strong SJ, Ohta Y, Litman GW, Amemiya CT: Marked improvement of PAC and BAC cloning is achieved using electroelution of pulsed-field gel-separated partial digests of genomic DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 1997, 25: 3959-3961. 10.1093/nar/25.19.3959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Osoegawa K, Woon PY, Zhao B, Frengen E, Tateno M, Catanese JJ, de Jong PJ: An improved approach for construction of bacterial artificial chromosome libraries. Genomics 1998, 52: 1-8. 10.1006/geno.1998.5423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Magbanua ZV, Ozkan S, Bartlett BD, Chouvarine P, Saski CA, Liston A, Cronn RC, Nelson CD, Peterson DG: Adventures in the enormous: a 1.8 million clone BAC library for the 21.7 Gb genome of loblolly pine. PLoS One 2011, 6: e16214. 10.1371/journal.pone.0016214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Montsant A, Jabbari K, Maheswari U, Bowler C: Comparative genomics of the pennate diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Plant Physiol 2005, 137: 500-513. 10.1104/pp.104.052829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hallegraeff GM, Anderson DM, Cembella AD (Eds): Manual on Harmful Marine Microalgae. UNESCO Publishing; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Phaeodactylum Tricornutum v2.0.

  37. Gibson DG: Gene and genome construction in yeast. In Curr Protoc Mol Biol. Volume Chapter 3 Edited by: Ausube FM. 2011(April), Unit3.22.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Falciatore A, Casotti R, Leblanc C, Abrescia C, Bowler C: Transformation of nonselectable reporter genes in marine diatoms. Mar Biotechnol 1999, 1: 239-251. 10.1007/PL00011773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T: Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Volume 3. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2001:2344.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gietz RD, Woods RA: Yeast transformation by the LiAc/SS Carrier DNA/PEG method. Methods Mol Biol 2005, 313: 107.

    Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors thank Chuck Merryman and Dan Gibson from the J. Craig Venter Institute and Peter DeHoff, Rob Brown, Michele Champagne, Toby Richardson, and Jim Flatt from Synthetic Genomics, Inc. for many helpful suggestions and discussions about this project.

This work was supported by the United States Department of Energy Genomics Science program grant (DE-SC0008593) and by Synthetic Genomics, Inc. (SGI).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip D Weyman.

Additional information

Competing interests

JCV. is Chief Executive Officer and Co-Chief Scientific Officer of Synthetic Genomics, Inc. HOS. is Co-Chief Scientific Officer and on the Board of Directors of Synthetic Genomics, Inc. CAH. is Chairman of the Synthetic Genomics, Inc. Scientific Advisory Board. All three of these authors and the J. Craig Venter Institute hold Synthetic Genomics, Inc. stock.

Authors’ contributions

The following authors designed experiments and analyzed data: BJK, BM, JJ, WJH, YCL, CT, ITY, VNN, RYC, AEA, CLD, JIG, CAH, HOS, JCV, and PDW. Experiments were performed by BJK, BM, JJ, WJH, YCL, CT, ITY, and PDW. The paper was written by BJK and PDW. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karas, B.J., Molparia, B., Jablanovic, J. et al. Assembly of eukaryotic algal chromosomes in yeast. J Biol Eng 7, 30 (2013).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: